Sentences with phrase «by copyright board»

Access Copyright's proposed tariff (which will ultimately be determined by the copyright board at a future hearing), was an all - in - one fee of $ 45 per full - time student.

After the decision by the SCC on the subject, the redetermination by the Copyright Board was, in the words of Justice Rothstein, «terse» (as most 1 - sentence decisions tend to be).

On March 22, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal (Court) published its decision in The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency, Operating as Access Copyright v Canada, 2018 FCA 58, dismissing Access Copyright's application for judicial review of a decision by the Copyright Board (Board) certifying the royalties that provincial and territorial governments must pay Access Copyright for the reproduction of copyright - protected works.

Once a licence has been granted by the Copyright Board, all accrued and future royalties will be paid into a separate trust account established by CSI expressly for this purpose.

B approved by the Copyright Board respecting the use of recorded music to accompany physical activities, including fitness classes.

These rates are all set by Copyright Board tariff and include performance monies (think radio and online streaming mostly) as well as reproduction royalties (think vinyl and download copies onto which compositions are recorded).

This is a performance in public though to pay a royalty on it would have to be set by copyright board tariff.

In August 2011, Kingston, Ont. - based Queen's opted out of an interim tariff imposed by the Copyright Board.

Nowhere is this regulation more apparent, or specific for that matter, than at the level of setting tariffs for copyright uses as set by the Copyright Board and administered by collective societies.

Last summer, York University declared that it will appeal the July 12, 2017 ruling of the Federal Court of Canada that was made in favor of Access Copyright, whose tariff on course materials, approved by Copyright Board of Canada, the university refused to pay.

Publishers can continue to be paid, perhaps through automated (and anonymized) tracking of usage and an updated version of the music industry's mechanical licensing model, which involves tariffs certified by the Copyright Board of Canada.

Not exact matches

Mechanical rights for streaming services are governed in the U.S. by a government agency known as the Copyright Royalty Board.

NOTE: MLS ® property information is provided under copyright © by the Victoria Real Estate Board.

This essay appeared in Loving God With One's Mind, by F. Thomas Trotter, copyright 1987 by the Board of Higher Education and Ministry of the United Methodist Church.

Published by The Christava Sahitya Samiti, Cross Junction, Tiruvalla 689 101, Kerala, in collaboration with The Board of Theological Text books Programe in South Asia, Copyright 1998.

It was copyrighted by National Board Of Young Men's Christian Association in 1959.

Copyright © Malaysian Palm Oil Board Designed by Bioinformatics Unit, Advanced Biotechnology and Breeding Centre (ABBC)

The digitized images are copyright © 1993 - 5 by the Anglo - Australian Observatory Board, and are distributed herein by agreement.

According to my correspondence with the Royal Observatory Edinburgh and the Space Telescope Science Institute, I am allowed to use the POSS - II / UKSTU data to create and display images for non-commercial purposes so long as I include this fine print for the SuperCOSMOS data: Use of these images is courtesy of the UK Schmidt Telescope (copyright in which is owned by the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council of the UK and the Anglo - Australian Telescope Board) and the Southern Sky Survey as created by the SuperCOSMOS measuring machine and are reproduced here with permission from the Royal Observatory Edinburgh.

Editors - in - Chief: Virginie Serin and Luis Viña - Editorial board ISSN: 1286 - 0042 - eISSN: 1286 - 0050 Frequency: monthly Copyright / Published by: EDP Sciences

Copyright © 2014 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.

Copyright 1988 Detroit voters sent a clear signal of their dissatisfaction with the city's school system last Tuesday by ousting three school - board incumbents and rejecting two requests for additional school funding.

Any person found to have intentionally breached the security of the test system may be subject to sanctions including, but not limited to, disciplinary action by a local board of education, the revocation of Connecticut teaching certification by the State Board of Education, and civil liability pursuant to federal copyrightboard of education, the revocation of Connecticut teaching certification by the State Board of Education, and civil liability pursuant to federal copyrightBoard of Education, and civil liability pursuant to federal copyright law.

You agree not to upload or post on this Website any Content (including your Work) that: a) is libelous or defamatory or is obscene, pornographic, abusive, harassing, or threatening; b) infringes any intellectual property right or any other rights of any entity or person, including but not limited any copyrights or trademarks; c) violates any law; d) advocates illegal activity; e) advertises or otherwise solicits funds or is a solicitation for goods or services, except on sections of the Website, if any, e.g., a listing board, on which solicitation for goods and services is expressly authorized by Book Country; f) contains a virus or other harmful component; g) solicits personal information; h) involves the transmission of chain mail, junk mail or spam; or i) impersonates another person or entity.

Test Drive Approved device requirements include compatibility with the library's eBook catalog, direct Wi - Fi checkout and eBook download via an on - board browser or app, and copyright protection (DRM) and lending practices that conform to rules as required by publisher permissions.

According to an article by Ovetta Wiggins for The Washington Post, the Prince George's County school board has approved for consideration a new policy that would declare that anything created by a teacher for use in a classroom, such as a lesson plan or other teaching material — whether on school time and with school materials, or at home with personal materials — belongs solely to the school system with regard to the copyright.

Copyright © 2001 - 2015 by American Coton Club (ACC) Content and materials on this site may not be copied or reproduced in any fashion without express written consent of the ACC Board.

Copyright © 2001 - 2016 by American Coton Club (ACC) Content and materials on this site may not be copied or reproduced in any fashion without express written consent of the ACC Board of Directors.

She also identified a Board of Trustees with the responsibility of ensuring that her artworks, collection of works by other artists, archives and papers, copyright, and financial assets would be properly stewarded as an artist - endowed foundation, with a broad mission to support the arts in a manner to be determined by the Foundation.

Oracle brought multiple patent claims and a copyright claim against Google in 2010, only to lose across the board in 2012 in a trial presided over by Judge Alsup.

Editors - in - Chief: Anna Belehaki and Jean Lilensten - Editorial board eISSN: 2115 - 7251 Copyright / Published by: EDP Sciences

Several copyright reforms have made it possible for copyright owners to cartelize growing swaths of the copyright landscape by establishing «collective societies» who can ask the Copyright Board to certify «tariffs», and then collect thcopyright reforms have made it possible for copyright owners to cartelize growing swaths of the copyright landscape by establishing «collective societies» who can ask the Copyright Board to certify «tariffs», and then collect thcopyright owners to cartelize growing swaths of the copyright landscape by establishing «collective societies» who can ask the Copyright Board to certify «tariffs», and then collect thcopyright landscape by establishing «collective societies» who can ask the Copyright Board to certify «tariffs», and then collect thCopyright Board to certify «tariffs», and then collect those fees.

September 26, 2017 — Toronto and Montréal: On August 25, 2017, the Copyright Board of Canada («Board») released its decision certifying the royalties payable to songwriters and music publishers for the reproduction of musical works by online music services operating in Canada, including services that offer music downloads, on - demand streaming and webcasting.

Rather than have radio stations, for example, negotiate multiple rights every time a song is played on a radio, a tariff is set by a neutral party — the Copyright Board — that makes it easier for users to pay and for authors to collect money.

We wrote here March 8 about a March 2 decision of the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board raising royalty rates for Webcasts by 30 percent.

when disclosure is required by law — for example, in connection with a proceeding before the Copyright Board of Canada or if a court issues a subpoena;

The Association of Canadian Publishers (ACP) is alarmed by the legal actions launched last week by Ministries of Education for all provinces and territories (except Quebec, and in Ontario through the provinces» school boards) against the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) demanding repayment of more than $ 25 million collected under a legally certified tariff for the period of 2010 to 2012.

However, in December 2010 they approved Access Copyrights request for an interim tariff and amazingly conclude this announcement by saying: «This decision is being issued without reasons because the Board considers this matter to be urgent.»

All this hit the fan when in June 2010 Access Copyright submitted to the Copyright Board a Statement of Proposed Royalties to be collected by Access Copyright from post-secondary institutions for the years 2011 - 2013 for the reprographic reproduction in Canada of works in its repertoire.

The Board certified the amounts of the tariffs, but excluded (from one of the proposed tariffs) a provision requiring the provinces to cease using digital copies of the copyrighted materials and delete the copyrighted materials from their hard drives when they were no longer covered by the tariff.

CSI and CRIA are arguing that the application of the CCH test by the Board and the Federal Court of Appeal is inconsistent with Canada's international copyright obligations and should be reversed.

CRIA is being represented by Glen Bloom of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, who had represented the plaintiffs / appellants in CCH and who is also now representing the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC), the lead objectors to the Access Copyright proposed tariff now before the Copyright Board.

test by the Board and the Federal Court of Appeal is inconsistent with Canada's international copyright obligations and should be reversed.

Also, in the Copyright Board's press release it stated that it recognized «the difficult financial situaion of the satellite radio services» and that they «expect to be profitable only by the year 2010.»

In preparing for the Copyright Board hearing, Access Copyright had invested substantial time and resources in order to determine exactly what is being photocopied today by the primary, secondary and post-secondary education sector.

Bill Heinze writes that «The Copyright Royalty Board of the Library of Congress has announced a cost of living adjustment of 4.3 percent in the royalty rates paid by colleges, universities, or other nonprofit educational institutions that are not affiliated with National Public Radio for the use of copyrighted published nondramatic musical compositions in the BMI, ASCAP, and SESAC repertoires.»

Statement of Royalties to be Collected by SOCAN and NRCC in respect of Pay Audio Services for the Years 2007 - 2009, Copyright Board, January 15, 2010

Successfully defeating a preliminary injunction motion and obtaining summary judgment dismissing trade secrets claims against board members of a nonprofit library and archive who were sued in Colorado and Virginia by the Church of Scientology for copyright and trade secrets violations based upon posting of church materials to the Internet.

Over the past 18 months nearly every Canadian university, college and school board outside Quebec has adopted «fair dealing» content use guidelines closely mirroring those distributed by CMEC in the 3rd edition of Copyright Matters!

A recent ruling by the Copyright Royalty Board put out a new, higher baseline fee schedule for music licensing.