Scientists have discovered new evidence to suggest that lightning on Earth is triggered not only
by cosmic rays from space, but also by energetic particles from the Sun.
Not exact matches
Complicated cascades of subatomic reactions in the atmosphere triggered
by high - energy
cosmic rays from outer space.
These particles are one of the most pervasive forms of matter in the Universe: they are created in the Sun and in supernovas,
by cosmic rays crashing into the upper atmosphere, and they are even made on Earth, streaming out
from nuclear reactors and radioactive rocks.
Prior to CRaTER and recent measurements
by the Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) on the Mars rover Curiosity, the effects of thick shielding on
cosmic rays had only been simulated in computer models and in particle accelerators, with little observational data
from deep space.
Using 30,000
rays with energies above 8 EeV, they find that
by a margin of about 12 %, more
cosmic rays come
from one side of the sky than the other.
Over time, it should detect tens or hundreds of
cosmic rays from individual AGNs and their range of energies should clarify exactly how they were accelerated — a process thought to be controlled
by magnetic fields around the colossal black holes.
Earth's surface is constantly bombarded
by cosmic rays, high energy particles streaming into Earth
from space.
Alien worlds, like Earth, are shielded
from cosmic rays by magnetic bubbles around their sun — trouble is, stars have a tendency to drop their guard
They studied boulders
from the New Zealand site where the glacial wood had been found, measuring the concentrations in the rocks of radioactive isotopes beryllium - 10 and chlorine - 36, which are produced
by nuclear reactions between minerals and
cosmic rays.
It does so
by detecting the gamma
rays those elements emit when they are bombarded
by high - energy charged particles
from space called
cosmic rays.
From the sky map of the
cosmic rays (left), physicists deduce the hotspot
by counting the
rays within 20 ° of each point on the sky.
Now, a new theoretical model reveals that they all could be shot out into space after
cosmic rays are accelerated
by powerful jets
from supermassive black holes.
The EUSO telescope, which will be used to find debris, was originally planned to detect ultraviolet light emitted
from air showers produced
by ultra-high energy
cosmic rays entering the atmosphere at night.
A competing theory suggests that
cosmic rays bombarding Earth
from outer space initiate lightning
by introducing high - energy electrons that begin the cascade leading to a strike.
The high - energy
cosmic neutrinos detected
by IceCube are believed to originate
from cosmic -
ray interactions with matter (proton - proton interactions);
from cosmic -
ray interactions with radiation (proton - photon interactions); or
from the decay or destruction of heavy, invisible «dark matter.»
The CTA, which should be completed
by around the end of the decade, would allow scientists to carry out a range of research projects across astrophysics and fundamental physics,
from the origin of
cosmic rays to particle acceleration around black holes.
When the glacier starts to retreat, the frontal moraines are no longer protected
by the ice, and a sort of «geological chronometer» is triggered, as the rocks begin to accumulate beryllium - 10 and helium - 3 produced
by particles resulting
from cosmic rays.
Measurements
from TIGER seem to show that about 20 percent of
cosmic rays consist of heavy elements expelled
by the stars themselves.
It might sound like something
from a science fiction plot — astronauts traveling into deep space being bombarded
by cosmic rays — but radiation exposure is science fact.
Researchers tallied the figure
by measuring the concentrations of beryllium - 10, an isotope produced naturally when
cosmic rays strike rocks at Earth's surface, in sediments gathered
from slopes and riverbeds (image).
Particles blown outward
by the solar wind are speeding in one direction, while particles
from cosmic rays generated outside the solar system are
Neutrinos don't get deflected
by the Milky Way's magnetic field, so if it can be established that they come
from the same sources as the
cosmic rays, the neutrinos can be used to better locate their shared origins.
After accounting for the deflection of the
cosmic rays by the Milky Way's magnetic field, the team found that the particles are travelling about 326 million light years
from a region of extragalactic space containing several potential sources, such as active galactic nuclei and starburst galaxies.
This image illustrates the «multi-messenger» emission
from a gigantic reservoir of
cosmic rays that are accelerated
by powerful jets
from a supermassive black hole.
Some gamma
rays can be produced
by radioactive elements within Ceres itself, but most are byproducts of
cosmic rays originating
from elsewhere in space.
The highest - energy
cosmic rays are not deflected much
by the weak magnetic fields in our Galaxy, yet they do not arrive preferentially
from the disk of the Milky Way or the side of the sky toward the center of the Galaxy.
By deflecting harmful charged particles
from the sun and the
cosmic rays...
But radiation
from the sun and
cosmic rays is 100 times stronger in space than on Earth, which is protected
by a layer of ozone and the Van Allen radiation belts.
A team of scientists
from 17 countries have found the most likely origin of galactic
cosmic rays - the centres of distant galaxies (Active Galactic Nuclei) powered
by supermassive black holes.
These are created
by radiation of many kinds, some coming
from above, such as
cosmic rays, and some
from rocks, such as the decay of radioactive minerals.
So while it's true that organisms living deep in the Earth are not exposed to the high - energy radiation found when you travel between planets or more hypothetically between stars, the systems that cells have evolved to repair damage done
by reactive oxygen species will be useful whether they arise
from rocks or
from cosmic rays.
CLOUD also finds that ions
from galactic
cosmic rays strongly enhance the production rate of pure biogenic particles —
by a factor 10 - 100 compared with particles without ions.
The Pierre Auger Observatory has detected more muons
from cosmic -
ray showers than predicted
by the most up - to - date particle - physics models.
In addition one Nobel Prize - winning scientist, Paul Crtuzen, suggests that tiny particles called sulfates can act as a
cosmic sunscreen
by blocking the sun's
rays from reaching Earth.
Trailing Earth's orbit at 94 million miles away, the Kepler space telescope has survived many potential knock - outs during its nine years in flight,
from mechanical failures to being blasted
by cosmic rays.
, which are caused
by very high energy gamma -
ray photons
from cosmic sources smashing into the atmosphere.
Such a telescope would use large arrays of ground - based telescopes to detect blue flashes of Cerenkov radiation, which are caused
by very high energy gamma -
ray photons
from cosmic sources smashing into the atmosphere.
When they reach the surface of the earth, the particles
from an air shower initiated
by a 1020 eV
cosmic ray may cover an area of 16 square kilometers.
Prior to this study, researchers attempting to explain the abundance of Beryllium - 10 decay products in meteorites had theorized that a process called spallation — wherein high - energy particles strip away protons or neutrons
from a heavy nucleus —
by cosmic rays was the culprit.
Turns out scientists
from the prestigious CERN laboratories are now suggesting that 50 - 100 % of the global warming we've been seeing may actually be caused
by interactions between
cosmic rays and the Earth's atmosphere.
The warming trends in looking at numerous 100 year temperature plots
from northern and high elevation climate stations... i.e. warming trends in annual mean and minimum temperature averages, winter monthly means and minimums and especially winter minimum temperatures and dewpoints... indicate climate warming that is being driven
by the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere — no visible effects
from other things like changes in solar radiation or the levels of
cosmic rays.
Svensmark (1998) later proposed that changes in the inter-planetary magnetic fields (IMF) resulting
from variations on the sun can affect the climate through galactic
cosmic rays (GCR)
by modulating earth's cloud cover.
By the way, low clouds in darkness increase surface temperature, sort of like the inverse property of commonly understood
Cosmic ray effect, not causing a cooling because there are more CR's, but rather a warming, which only low clouds in total darkness can do, so the probable CR temperature signal gets cancelled
from one latitude dark vs bright region to the next.
In reality there is a huge diversity of opinion within the skeptic side, like: it's cooling; it's warming (but not as much as GISSTemp says); whatever the temperature is doing, it's caused
by cosmic rays, or PDO, or sunspots, or recovery
from the LIA...; CO2 is a greenhouse gas (but the feedbacks are negative); CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.....
But if they can be linked to warmer conditions globally, then these would be most likely caused
by solar variations or
cosmic rays, a recovery
from the LIA and certainly not due to increases in CO2 levels, which aren't caused
by human emissions anyway.
This
cosmic ray hypothesis had already been debunked before 2013: and in addition, since 2013 there has been more evidence (
from cloud - chamber experiments
by CERN scientists) showing that this
cosmic ray hypothesis is false.
Instead they offer a theory that climate change probably derives predominantly
from natural ocean - atmosphere oscillations and / or
by natural solar variations (irradiation and
cosmic ray flux) and / or
by natural cloud cover variations and / or the Milankovitch Effect, i.e. it is probably predominantly just natural.
Later, the enhancement of atmospheric aerosol particle formation
by ions generated
from cosmic rays was proposed as a physical mechanism explaining this correlation.
The sunspot number you show is very controversial, e.g. http://www.leif.org/research/Solar-Activity-Past-Present-and-Future.pdf and http://ssnworkshop.wikia.com/wiki/Home And the correlation is contradicted
by the Figure in the article of this thread: http://www.leif.org/research/HMF-Briffa.png The green curve is solar activity deduced
from cosmic ray proxies of the solar magnetic field as carried out to the Earth
by the solar wind.
DocMartyn, please verify for yourself that nowadays 14C is created in the atmosphere,
from nitrogen nuclei,
by cosmic rays (for awhile some was made
by H - bombs, but fortunately those days are past).