Sentences with phrase «by courts on»

The question of whether an attorney is regularly engaged in debt collection is made by courts on a case - by - case basis, with courts looking at factors such as percentage of revenue generated by the debt - collecting activities; the volume of debt - collecting activities; and whether the attorney has an on - going relationship with a collection service.

Attending traffic school for ticket dismissal in Kansas is mandated by the courts on a case - by - case basis.

This course may also be approved by courts on a case - by - case basis to dismiss a traffic ticket.

Settlements reached using ODR are nothing more than transactions, i.e.: «contracts by which the parties prevent a future contestation, put an end to a lawsuit or settle difficulties arising in the execution of a judgment, by way of mutual concessions or reservations» (as defined in section 2631 of the Quebec Civil Code), and they are deferred to and enforced by the Courts on a regular basis.

According to Marshall v Marshall, the test applied by the courts on an interim order is: what temporary living arrangements are the least disruptive, most supportive, and most protective of the child?

The nature and extent of recoverable damages are assessed by the Courts on a case - by - case basis, except for rare cases where statutory damages are permitted by law (for ex.

The Federal Court of Appeal held that whether an adjudicator has a legal obligation to consider an argument is part of his or her duty of procedural fairness — which is assessed by the courts on a standard of correctness.

The Franks Report set out a firm opinion that statutory tribunal decisions must be subject to review, and moreover that these decisions must be subject to review by the courts on points of law.

The Supreme Court has held that the doctrine of Kompetenz - Kompetenz will not be final and will be subject to review by the courts on an application for recognition and enforcement under the New York Convention.

It appears to reflect the recent emphasis by the courts on judicial efficiency.

Much ink has been spilled by courts on when a defendant will be permitted to adduce «evidence to the contrary».

We may, therefore, be seeing a change in the approach to sentencing in OH&S cases where jail sentences will be requested by Crown prosecutors and imposed more frequently by courts on individuals convicted of offences involving the breach of OH&S standards, serious injuries or significant incidents.

This period is assessed by the courts on a case - by - case basis, depending on an employee's age, position, length of service and the availability of alternate employment together with other relevant factors as may be condisered important in the circumstances.

The parties will not object to the exercise of jurisdiction by those courts on any basis.

This does not include indirect amounts spent by our health, fire and police departments on animal - related issues and by our courts on animal abuse / neglect cases.

the SM has been found to be a legal investment vehicle and has been upheld by the courts on several challenges.

Three years ago, when four of the major health insurers rushed to partner on large - scale mergers, the deals were blocked by the Department of Justice, and ultimately rejected by the courts on anti-trust grounds.

Please be advised that in accordance with the Order Amending the Claims Procedure Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice of Revision or Disallowance by no later than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise ordered by the Court on application by the Monitor.

Olympiakos are planning an appeal after the Greek champions were docked three points by a court on Monday following fan violence.

The automatic registration of mothers and the conditional registration of fathers (conditional on either the mother's consent or by a court on child welfare grounds) are factors in communicating to everyone the low expectations by society of fathers» involvement with their children compared to expectations on mothers.

This sanction is imposed by the court on dangerous and sane offenders, when an ordinary time - limited prison sentence in itself is considered insufficient for protecting the community.

The Access Bank (GH) East Cant cheque number 890081 and the Attorney General's receipt which were exhibited to the Attorney General's affidavit sworn by the Attorney General herself on 9th November 2016 as Exhibits «AG 7» and «AG7A» are attached herewith in PDF for the public to judge how any Attorney General, worth the name, can accept a cheque drawn on the Economic and Organized Crime Office which was not party to the action as part payment of the refund ordered by the Court on 29th July 2014 for the Republic.

In the same manner, the National Assembly whose law can be struck down by the court on the basis that it is unconstitutional can also amend a law later to override the decision of the Supreme Court as they did in the onshore / offshore oil case.

• He was subsequently acquitted and discharged by the court on March 10, 2015 but the state challenged the acquittal, which was subsequently dismissed yesterday.

The five «galamseyers» were arrested by the National Anti-galamsey Task - Force at Abodom in the Bekwai District, and granted bail by the court on September 6, 2017.

The commission stated, «An order was made by this court on the 20th of July, 2016 for interim attachment / forfeiture of the properties contained in this application for a period of 45 days.

The motion on notice was premised on five grounds including the request to enforce the 3 week permission granted him by the court on November 3 to keep a re-rescheduled medical appointment with his physician abroad.

Judgment is expected to be delivered by the Court on Friday, 4th December, 2015.

Last week, the court allocated time for U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement to argue in support of five nonunion teachers and Washington state when their appeals are heard by the court on Jan. 10.

Joe Sandler, counsel for the HIA, stated: «The Court's order effectively prevents the DEA from enforcing its Interpretive Rule «until a final ruling by the Court on the validity of the DEA's action.

«RESPONSES OF THE NINE PROPOSED AMICI CURIAE 23 LISTED BELOW TO THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR 24 PARTICIPATION POSED BY THE COURT ON MARCH 19, 2018,» United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

The appeal heard by the Court on October 14, 2014, centres on whether the recital of a prayer at the beginning of public city council meetings violates provisions of -LSB-...]

Not only can these be disclosed and ultimately used by your opponent to weaken your position, but it can also be reviewed by the Court on the question of costs and compliance with the Protocols.

After waiting almost eight months for our motion date we were advised by the court on the morning before the scheduled date that no judge would be available and that the motion would need to be rescheduled into 2013.

Whereas the first question is addressed for the first time to the CJEU (in Spasic the validity of the so - called «enforcement clause» provided by Article 54 CISA was challenged), the second question touches upon an aspect already considered by the Court on several occasions.

That is an underlying question in Jennings v. Rodriguez, which will be heard by the court on Wednesday.

Unfortunately, again, it seems that similar decisions are taken by the Court on a regular basis these days.

Two questions arose: (i) whether s 204 contained an express requirement under which the county court was required by an enactment to make a decision applying the principles that were applied by the court on an application for judicial review, thus placing s 204 appeals within the public law category; and (ii) if not, whether there were any other reasons requiring the application of judicial review principles with the result that s 204 appeals fell within the post-LASPO 2012 civil legal aid regime.

Further, the draftsman clearly drew a very important difference between «an appeal... on any point of law» in s 204 (1) and «the principles that are applied by the court on an application for judicial review» in s 204A (4) by using those different terms for different classes of cases in HA 1996.

The injunction entered by the court on Monday, as Atkins points out, was refreshing in the flexibility it offered to the defendant:

Those determinations had already been made and were, in fact, affirmed by the court on appeal.

For those of you interested in how the story continues, here is the decision handed down by the Court on 27 October 2016...

Congress further found that the «limitation imposed by the Court on the filing of discriminatory compensation claims ignores the reality of wage discrimination and is at odds with the robust application of the civil rights laws that Congress intended.»

The judge dismissed the claim on the basis that the injury claimant had been advised by the court on several occasions of how to advance his claim and what evidence to bring forward, but had failed to do so.

While not completely disposing of the lawsuit, a ruling by the court on individual issues in the injured party's favor may result in the defendant being more inclined to resolve the personal injury lawsuit short of trial by negotiating a just settlement.

The case comment focuses on the case of Ursa Ventures Ltd. v. Edmonton (City), 2016 ABCA 135 and two companion decisions recently rendered by the Court on this subject.

The new rules provide an expedited procedure that can be initiated by the court on its own, where a vexatious claim can be dismissed without the involvement of the defendants.

We also filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs, which was heard by the court on the «eve» of trial.

This principle has been repeated by this Court on numerous occasions during the intervening years.

Unlike Poundmaker, who was sentenced to three years in the Manitoba Penitentiary, Yellow Mud Blanket was released by the court on the recommendation of Crown counsel; see Sandra E. Bingaman, The North - West Rebellion Trials, 1885 (MA Thesis, University of Saskatchewan [Regina], 1971)[unpublished] Appendix A at 206; see also Sandra E. Bingaman, «The Trials of Poundmaker and Big Bear, 1885» (1975) 28 Saskatchewan History 81; Blair Stonechild and W.A. Waiser, Loyal till Death: Indians and the North - West Rebellion (Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1997); Bob Beal and R.C. Macleod, Prairie Fire: The 1885 North - West Rebellion (Edmonton: Hurtig Publishers, 1984).