Sentences with phrase «by data protection rules»

The information is typically protected by data protection rules and is zealously guarded by political parties, who do not like pollsters and journalists sniffing around their membership for changes in mood.

Not exact matches

In 2016 the European Union adopted new data - protection rules — which come into effect next year — that include a legal right to an explanation of decisions made by algorithms.

The Department of Transportation is issuing a third «Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections» final rule to enhance protections for air travelers and to improve the air travel environment as follows: expanding the pool of reporting carriers for service quality data; requiring reporting carriers to include service quality data for their domestic scheduled flights operated by their code - share partners; enhancing the Department's code - share disclosure regulation to codify the statutory requirement that carriers and ticket agents must disclose any code - share arrangements on their websites on the first display presented in response to a search of a requested itinerary for each itinerary involving a code - share operation; and prohibiting undisclosed biasing based on carrier identity by carriers and ticket agents in any electronic displays of the fare, schedule or availability information of multiplProtections» final rule to enhance protections for air travelers and to improve the air travel environment as follows: expanding the pool of reporting carriers for service quality data; requiring reporting carriers to include service quality data for their domestic scheduled flights operated by their code - share partners; enhancing the Department's code - share disclosure regulation to codify the statutory requirement that carriers and ticket agents must disclose any code - share arrangements on their websites on the first display presented in response to a search of a requested itinerary for each itinerary involving a code - share operation; and prohibiting undisclosed biasing based on carrier identity by carriers and ticket agents in any electronic displays of the fare, schedule or availability information of multiplprotections for air travelers and to improve the air travel environment as follows: expanding the pool of reporting carriers for service quality data; requiring reporting carriers to include service quality data for their domestic scheduled flights operated by their code - share partners; enhancing the Department's code - share disclosure regulation to codify the statutory requirement that carriers and ticket agents must disclose any code - share arrangements on their websites on the first display presented in response to a search of a requested itinerary for each itinerary involving a code - share operation; and prohibiting undisclosed biasing based on carrier identity by carriers and ticket agents in any electronic displays of the fare, schedule or availability information of multiple carriers.

Nominated persons under the age of 18 who are a member of a Household Account are governed by the same data protection rules as other Household Account Members who are 18 or over.

The Article 29 Working Party is demanding that its data protection rules apply to personal data processed by companies that do not even have EU offices.

The Court, by adopting a literal interpretation of the concept of controller and eschewing any subjective component, preserved the broad scope of application of the Directive and emphasised the importance of such a broad scope of application for the effectiveness of data protection rules.

Furthermore, when ruling on the second condition of Article 8 Regulation 45/2001 whereby EU institutions have a duty to verify that data subjects» legitimate interests may not be harmed by the transfer, the Court found that the personal data at issue fell into the public sphere of MEPs and as such required a lesser degree of protection.

In this milestone ruling, the Court also reaffirmed the key role played by national Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in the European system of data protection, and clarified the different competences of the European Commission, the DPAs and the courts — including the ECJ - in assessing the adequate level of protection offered by a third counData Protection Authorities (DPAs) in the European system of data protection, and clarified the different competences of the European Commission, the DPAs and the courts — including the ECJ - in assessing the adequate level of protection offered by a thirProtection Authorities (DPAs) in the European system of data protection, and clarified the different competences of the European Commission, the DPAs and the courts — including the ECJ - in assessing the adequate level of protection offered by a third coundata protection, and clarified the different competences of the European Commission, the DPAs and the courts — including the ECJ - in assessing the adequate level of protection offered by a thirprotection, and clarified the different competences of the European Commission, the DPAs and the courts — including the ECJ - in assessing the adequate level of protection offered by a thirprotection offered by a third country.

In the meantime, companies that were transferring data to the US under the Safe Harbour (including all Internet Giants) have to find creative solutions to meet the CJEU criteria as the use of the alternative instruments foreseen by the Data Protection Directive (contracts, binding corporate rules) is exposed to similar criticism from national courts, or at least to greater scrutiny from DPAs with regard to the mechanisms of protection installed to prevent (disproportionate) access to the data by US law enforcement authoritdata to the US under the Safe Harbour (including all Internet Giants) have to find creative solutions to meet the CJEU criteria as the use of the alternative instruments foreseen by the Data Protection Directive (contracts, binding corporate rules) is exposed to similar criticism from national courts, or at least to greater scrutiny from DPAs with regard to the mechanisms of protection installed to prevent (disproportionate) access to the data by US law enforcement authoritData Protection Directive (contracts, binding corporate rules) is exposed to similar criticism from national courts, or at least to greater scrutiny from DPAs with regard to the mechanisms of protection installed to prevent (disproportionate) access to the data by US law enforcement auProtection Directive (contracts, binding corporate rules) is exposed to similar criticism from national courts, or at least to greater scrutiny from DPAs with regard to the mechanisms of protection installed to prevent (disproportionate) access to the data by US law enforcement auprotection installed to prevent (disproportionate) access to the data by US law enforcement authoritdata by US law enforcement authorities.

Otherwise, while the conclusion reached by the Advocate General is undoubtedly a pragmatic one and might be viewed as keeping data protection rules within sensible limits, his reasoning may prove to be problematic.

The Canadian cloud has been seen as one of the most attractive data destinations: national privacy policies and provincial rules and regulations in this country provide good protections for an individual's personal information, as well as important data held or used by public institutions such as schools, universities, hospitals, government - owned utilities and government - operated service providers.

The EU data centre will help clients navigate data privacy, e-discovery and e-disclosure obligations after the European Court of Justice ruled in October 2015 that the Safe Harbour arrangement governing data transfers between EU and U.S. did not provide the level of data protection required by EU law.

Once the relevancy has been determined, a stronger case can be made that because these documents have been viewed by attorneys they are less likely to contain PII and therefore run afoul of data protection rules.

Imogen has been instructed by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to review applications for authorisation of «Binding Corporate Rules» (one mechanism for establishing appropriate safeguards for data transfers to third countries under the General Data Protection Regulatidata transfers to third countries under the General Data Protection RegulatiData Protection Regulation).

The Commission alleges the UK failed to comply with EU e-privacy and personal data protection rules by allowing Phorm to track internet users» web - surfing patterns to determine their interests and then deliver targeted advertising, without customers» consent.

7,000 Data Protection Officers Needed In The UK By May 2018 In Order To Comply With New EU Data Protection Rules

Jourova said that an extant challenge against so - called standard contractual clauses (SCCs)-- which are used by the likes of Facebook (and many other companies) to transfer personal data between their EU and US businesses, and which earlier this month the Irish High said it would refer to Europe's top court for a preliminary ruling — is relevant to Privacy Shield because it could also have implications for the latter's future viability (i.e. if the ECJ decides SCCs do not in fact offer adequate protection for citizens» data).

The General Data Protection Regulation is a rule passed by the European Union in 2016, setting new rules for how companies manage and share personal dData Protection Regulation is a rule passed by the European Union in 2016, setting new rules for how companies manage and share personal datadata.

The Safe Harbor rules were already under review by the European Commission, in the wake of the Snowden revelations expose of how U.S. intelligence agencies» surveillance apparatus taps into commercial Internet services, with data protection commissioner Viviane Reding stating back in July 2013 that Safe Harbor «may not be so safe».

The Weltimmo ruling effectively means that if a company operates a service in a country it can be held accountable by that country's national data protection agency — despite not being headquartered there.

Much of the GDPR builds on rules set by earlier EU privacy measures like the Privacy Shield and Data Protection Directive, but it expands on those measures in two crucial ways.

In an EC press conference on the ECJ ruling today, FVP of the Commission, Frans Timmermans, said: «Today's judgement by the court is an important step towards upholding European's fundamental rights to data protection.

In its ruling on the SCC issue, the Irish Court noted that a US ombudsperson position created under Privacy Shield to handle EU citizens complaints about companies» handling of their data is not enough to overcome what it described as «well founded concerns» raised by the DPC regarding the adequacy of the protections for EU citizens data.

But seen through the prism of stricter incoming EU data protection rules, under the new GDPR regime which comes into force next May, there are certainly serious financial considerations for Facebook's business pertaining to privacy — as the new EU regime includes a far larger stick to beat companies that are judged to have violated data protection rules while also tightening up privacy rules by, for example, expanding the definition of personal data and giving EU citizens the right to ask for their data to be deleted.

Tabled by the Luxembourgish deputy in 2012, the GDPR sets out to establish a single set of data protection rules across the 28 member states, to the benefit of both citizens and businesses.

The number of vacancies for Data Protection Officers (DPOs) has surged by 709 % since the rules of the General Data Protection Regulation...

In May last year, two privacy watchdogs in Europe slammed Facebook over the way it collects data about its users, alleging that the company broke European rules surrounding privacy and data protection by obtaining information about users (and non-users) through third - party sites without their consent.

TREB will require that Members (1) utilize appropriate security protection, such as firewalls, as long as such requirement does not impose security obligations greater than those employed concurrently by TREB; and (2) maintain an audit trail of Consumers» activity on the VOW and make that information available to TREB if TREB has reason to believe that any VOW has been the cause of, or permitted a breach in, the security of the MLS ® data or a violation of applicable MLS ® Rules and Policies (including the VOW Rules).

MLSs that allow persistent downloading of the MLS database by participants for display or distribution on the Internet or by other electronic means may require that participants» websites (1) utilize appropriate security protection, such as firewalls, provided that any security obligations imposed on participants may not be greater than those employed concurrently by the MLS, and / or (2) maintain an audit trail of consumer activity on participants» websites and make that information available to the MLS if the MLS has reason to believe that a participant's IDX website has caused or permitted a breach in the security of the data or a violation of MLS rules related to use by consumers.