Not exact matches
«Most firms make a profit
in two
ways:
by charging a service fee of $ 10 to $ 30 or $ 40 per transaction, and
by pocketing the
difference between the low price at which they buy currency and the higher price at which they sell it to customers.»
Although Instagram's user base is smaller
by comparison, the
differences in the demographic profile makes it stand out
in many
ways.
Josh Schukman has truly created something that matters -
in the eyes of social entrepreneurs and
in the eyes of those who care about making a
difference by way of cause based business models.
By way of example, if you are accruing interest at the rate of $ 600 / month, and your REPAYE payment is only $ 100 / month, you'll only accrue $ 250 / month
in interest, which is 50 % of the full $ 500
difference between the accruing interest and your payment.
«Because it doesn't make any
difference to me if my life is miserable because I've been put out of business
by something that's good for 320 - some million people
in some sort of infinitesimal
way and it's messed up my life.»
The Frenchman's lessons, as summarized
by Poulos, are sometimes woolly — the
difference between «performing our autonomy» (bad) and «experiencing our freedom» (good) is not intuitively clear to me — but nevertheless are provocative
in the
way that abstractions can be.
At several junctures I have pointed to the absence of any framework
by which the Oliners can distinguish qualitative
differences in the
ways persons are religious, the
ways they make sense of the claims of care, and the
ways they interpret what is their duty or obligation.
This stream is thought
by Wells to be less susceptible to «dalliances with culture» than its contemporary cousin: «The simplest
way to state this
difference is to say that
in classical spirituality what is moral is central, and
in postmodern spirituality it is not.»
To the cynic who might suggest that I come to terms with the
differences within myself
by taking a trip to Saudi Arabia, live a day
in a life as Bouazizi only to realize that these
differences should n`t exist, be curtailed, or that the makeup of the U.S is a standard makeup for the Middle East on its
way in becoming good, or at least docile, I'll say this: grow up.
Perhaps the quickest
way to encapsulate that
difference is as follows: while Process and Reality represents a systematic cosmology, Difference and Repetition develops a speculative «chaosmology» At its most simplistic, the distinction in play here is that between a cosmos in which order is imposed upon a primordial chaos «from outside,» or transcendently, (as when Form is imposed upon matter by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established a priori by the Leibnizean deity), and a chaosmos in which order is generated «from within,» by a wholly immanent process of self - org
difference is as follows: while Process and Reality represents a systematic cosmology,
Difference and Repetition develops a speculative «chaosmology» At its most simplistic, the distinction in play here is that between a cosmos in which order is imposed upon a primordial chaos «from outside,» or transcendently, (as when Form is imposed upon matter by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established a priori by the Leibnizean deity), and a chaosmos in which order is generated «from within,» by a wholly immanent process of self - org
Difference and Repetition develops a speculative «chaosmology» At its most simplistic, the distinction
in play here is that between a cosmos
in which order is imposed upon a primordial chaos «from outside,» or transcendently, (as when Form is imposed upon matter
by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established a priori
by the Leibnizean deity), and a chaosmos
in which order is generated «from within,»
by a wholly immanent process of self - organization.
I'm sticking to my position on gender equality
in the home and Church --(which doesn't mean I don't think there are
differences between men and women,
by the
way; it just means I am reluctant to declare those
differences universal and prescriptive or indicative of some sort of God - ordained hierarchy between men and women)-- but I want to «fight fair» if you will, especially with folks I consider to be my brothers and sisters
in Christ.
Now this, I should say, points up the basic
difference between the
way evolution was conceived
in Darwinism and the
way in which it is understood
by the emergent evolutionist.
By giving us a narrative arc that stretches from the earliest Church Fathers to Pope John Paul II and beyond, Roberts considers not only the
ways in which these figures disagree with one another but how they provide resources for understanding sexual
difference today.
It is a seductive
way of accommodating
differences by declaring a truce
in contentions over truth.
Because of all the
differences in people from their perspectives of environment and the
differences in abilities and talents such as artistic and philosophical perspectives, it is only natural that they would seek to worship god
in different
ways in different churches or at home
by themselves.
If we compare the power I exercise
by way of sound waves upon your ears (power, sense 1) with the power that I,
in action, exercise upon some neuron that fires or is inhibited from firing during the action (power, sense 2), we see a marked
difference.
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any
way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live
in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while
in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the
difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same
way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of
by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up
in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong
way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong
way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,
Suggestive as this
way is, it does not
by itself open an avenue to the new or to hope but rather to a world
in which the
difference between the new and old is irrelevant.
Perhaps we are too determined
by our history to transform ourselves
in that
way, but Mead allows those who preach and teach to hope that what we say and what people believe may still make a
difference in what happens next.
According to this view, authority is justified not
by what is common, but
by irreconcilable
differences in what people believe and
in the
ways in which they choose to live their lives.
They are impressed
by the
ways in which gender, race, and class
differences shape both different understandings of Christian faith and different social worlds
in which it is lived out.
Rather than challenge broad
differences in how people perceive / relate
by age or gender, the New Testament writings admonish for awareness & accommodation
in an understanding
way.
«
In this room, we have various minor points of difference between us... but we are united by a gospel too great and a mission too urgent to let any lesser thing stand in our wa
In this room, we have various minor points of
difference between us... but we are united
by a gospel too great and a mission too urgent to let any lesser thing stand
in our wa
in our
way.
Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be
in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved
in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others
in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that
in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am
in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating
in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change
in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was
in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing
in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time
in everything.
In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services
in the morning and one has services
in the evening so the two do nt really clash.
In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out
in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The
difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it
in his
way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured
by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead
by the holy spirit even if it is
in a very minor
way take small steps.regards brentnz
Nevertheless, there are subtle but important
differences between them, and where they differ I find myself siding with Whitehead.2 Since Whitehead's conceptuality is presupposed
in my extensions and applications, it seemed best to introduce the reader to this thought
by way of an intellectual biography tracing the development of his theism.
I shall do this not because there are not significant
differences in the
way various New Testament writers interpreted what Christ had accomplished, but because there will not be opportunity to present at all adequately each of these divergent views; and if one must choose, Paul's view is
by every criterion the most important.
By the end of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack pointed out, «most of the members felt that there was more danger from undue stress on the evangelism of individuals than the other way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression by Stott, that liberation in political, social and economic sense was in danger of replacing salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with regard to the meaning of salvation and the program of dialogue with people of other faith
By the end of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack pointed out, «most of the members felt that there was more danger from undue stress on the evangelism of individuals than the other
way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression
by Stott, that liberation in political, social and economic sense was in danger of replacing salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with regard to the meaning of salvation and the program of dialogue with people of other faith
by Stott, that liberation
in political, social and economic sense was
in danger of replacing salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important
differences continued, especially with regard to the meaning of salvation and the program of dialogue with people of other faiths.
One reason for this debate is that some of the most violent and seemingly intractable contemporary conflicts (Northern Ireland, the Middle East, Bosnia, Sri Lanka) have taken place across lines of religious
difference and have often been fed,
in more or less direct
ways,
by appeals to religious warrant or identity.
I think that neither Meland nor Loomer would have spoken this
way, and that the
difference lies
in whatever it was that made «Wieman first an idealist, who could believe that human possibility is explained
by an absolute potentiality.12
Indeed, it is
by comparative study of congregations that one can see how different construals of the Christian thing make real
differences in the
ways persons» lives are shaped and empowered.
Robinson was to be a warrior with a
difference, however: Rickey, an adept psychologist who believed
in the essential fairness of the American people, wanted a man with the courage not to fight back against the racist slurs, beanballs, and spikings that were sure to come his
way — except
by giving an unforgettable performance on the field.
Oh,
by the
way — I have had ONLY one family leave
in 13 years over theological
differences.
This last
difference seems to ground almost all the rest (save for the
differences concerning knowledge of singulars, and the principle of individuation), and it itself seems to be based on two principles: 1) that any two things that are really distinct can exist apart (Cf. MD 7, 2, 9) and 2) that every real thing is
in some
way actual, so that there can be limited acts which are not limited
by potencies distinct from them (Cf. MD 31, 13, 18).
Still,
by putting together the similarities and the
differences between various kinds of systems or organizations, we can gain better ideas of how a society works and of what must be done to change it
in desirable
ways.10
This harm consists
in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies,
by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity, which rather than being a natural given would have to give
way to orientation as an individual expression,
in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of
differences.
This harm consists
in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies,
by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity as a natural given, which would have to give
way to orientation as an individual expression,
in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of
differences.
Basically the same view underlies the ethos of many Episcopal theological schools, although with a good bit of ambiguity generated, perhaps,
by the
way differences in church polity and theology of ordination alter the clarity of the idea of being «
in orders.»
The larger context through which our total situation may be transfigured is best conceived
in terms of Civitas Dei, or the Kingdom of God, «which is not
in Time at all — either present, future or past — and which differs from all temporal mundane states
in the radical
way of being
in a different spiritual dimension, but which, just
by virtue of this
difference of dimension, is able to penetrate our mundane life and,
in penetrating, to transfigure it».
It will be close, but there are many
in the silent majority that will show up to the polls
in Nov. because they realize the stakes and oh
by the
way (OBTW)-- they really understand the
difference of having a Black POTUS driving the fringe bat - sch - tick and reality — of the bigger picture.
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must
in some other
way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to
ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members
by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action
in behalf of his family
in the emergency;
differences of opinion exist
in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection),
differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?
«
By partnering with the RSSF
in this
way, organisations can directly influence palm farming practices and make a measurable
difference to smallholder communities and their surrounding environment.»
I even made the crust
by hand (instead of lazy
way out
in processor) and it did make a huge
difference.
I altered it only
by using more ice cream than called for, occasionally, you could experience a bit of heat from the pepper, which, IMO didn't make a
difference in taste one
way or the other.
And surprise, surprise, Alexis has declared that he loves working with Wenger and leartning the nuances of the
way that the Gunners play as well as the
differences between football
in England and the Premier League and the
way it is played
in Spain and elsewhere, as reported
by the Daily Express.
Bradley's side are only off the foot of the table
by way of goal
difference and are
in genuine danger of being relegated if they are unable to turn their fortunes around.
Beat a top team and we are lucky, beat a lower team and we should be beating them anyway, lose when playing a too risky brand of football and we are inept, win a tight game playing ugly it is not acceptable nor the Arsenal
way, win
by 3 goals and it should have been 5, keep playing the same predictable
way every game and we should vary it more, vary our pattern of play and we should go back to doing what we used to, win 2 - 0 and keep a clean sheet and we should have been more adventurous to improve goal
difference, win 2 - 1 and concede
in the last minute and we were naive not to shut up shop, win 12 out of the last 15 games and it should have been 15 wins......... blah, blah.
Good for Paige for finding a
way to get paid, and I support that, but there is a gigantic
difference in how these fighters are supported
by the UFC.
Agreed, nice to see the ball being played forward
in attacking
way, Gibbs slows it down
by passing back, plus his closing down is poor Monreal and Bellerin really have made the
difference.
watching my team against Ireland yesterday even tough we won i wasn, t impressedit, we only start playing with purpose when we go behind and when we, re
in front we slow down our play, i thought koscielny had a decent game with a couple of good clearance and his job was made more difficult
by adil rami who is a burden on the team and always one mistake away, giroud can, t be blamed for his first half performance the guy was starved of any service and it, s only when griezman was moved to his favourite position that giroud started making the
difference what a great assist,
by the
way shane long dived for the penalty but that, s ok we are square now with the irish we had henry, s handball & they had the penalty!!
of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction
by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the
difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers
in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us...
in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no
way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity
in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best