Steve jobs once said «Don't be trapped
by dogma which is living with the results of other people's thinking» and i think it applies to value investing world as well.
And don't be swayed
by the dogma which says you can or you can't do something, because I think it's a huge choice for women to have to make.
Not exact matches
Don't be trapped
by dogma —
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma,
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
His predominant theme is the rise of a liberal model of civilisation
which he traces from Protestantism, with its «rejection of the normative significance of tradition in the field of Christian
dogma» (p. 6), followed
by the Enlightenment,
which placed an absolute value on the individual.
Without all that,
which is not itself
dogma, the
dogmas themselves would be unintelligible and as regards faith no longer assimilable
by the hearer.
The Christian must normally adopt an analogous attitude in theory and practice in regard to teachings and moral precepts of the Church
which are put forward authoritatively
by the Church, even if not as irrevocable
dogma.
But if that is done
by the Church's magisterium, it can only be through propositions
which are not themselves absolute
dogma but serious and valid items of knowledge (in varying degrees, of course, and of very many different kinds), but knowledge
which in principle is subject to revision and capable of improvement, and
which can be deepened, clarified, given greater discrimination, improved in this or that respect, or even abandoned.
In my judgment a reworking of Christianity along progressivist lines, i.e., along lines
which teach God's insistence upon democratic
dogmas and
which discern doctrine - altering «Revelation» in democratic social trends, remains an ongoing potentiality, whether initiated
by «Protestants» or «Catholics»; this follows, I hold, from Tocquevillian premises.
That framework itself dictates the priority of the historical quality over levels of interpretation
which would be less historical
by being more abstract (ontology, systematic
dogma) or individualistic.
Dogmas like the Immaculate Conception are «truth [s] revealed
by God and contained in that divine deposit
which Christ has delivered to his Spouse,» as Pope Pius XII said in 1950 in Munificentissimus Deus,
which declared Mary's Assumption into Heaven a
dogma.
In a closed society, typified
by communist and fascist countries and
by states in
which the agencies of government are in the hands of absolutist ecclesiastical authorities, the preservation of the social order requires that the schools be under political control, in order that the official
dogmas may be taught and the will of the controlling parties may be implanted in the minds of the young.
[3] He described the idea that a fetus is a person from the moment of conception as a «minority
dogma»
by which the majority of Americans was being «tyrannized.»
Hence he does not really enter into the whole investigation with
which Christianity begins, into the prius [before] in
which sin presupposes itself, and
which is Christianly explained
by the doctrine of original sin — a
dogma to the border of
which only we come in this investigation.
In 1986, an amicus curiae brief, signed
by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism (
which the brief described as embodying religious
dogma).
However, spiritual matters,
which are not subject to empirical testing (there is no way to physically measure love) should be tested in the crucible of human experience and present statistical evidence
by consensual (that is consensus, not consent) validation before being granted the status of a universal principle or
dogma.
This guy somewhat confused about the relationship between a person and god / the universal life force, and the relationship between the individual and the religion / corporate structure
which earns it's living
by peddling dated
dogma and reassurances that it's way is the right way to deal with the universe.
By saying there is only one god, you are dismissing those religions
which have believed in multiple gods for far longer than the desert religions have claimed the one - and - only - one
dogma.
This is the scarcely questioned and surprising result today of an enquiry
which for almost two hundred years has devoted prodigious and
by no means fruitless effort to regain and expound the life of the historical Jesus, freed from all embellishment
by dogma and doctrine.»
This is expressly stated as «
dogma» (e.g.,
by Epictetus), and from that are deduced the duties of men
which follow from this evaluation, and the security
which results if man can trust himself to the providence of his Father.
Christian religions live
by their
dogma,
which by definition means they pick and choose what they want to believe from the Bible.
That's fine if you want to believe in a concept of heaven or hell
which was INVENTED
by man, but when you realize that there is nothing but oblivion with death, you won't care about such silly
dogma.
If a man must say that he can not find God in the reality of his own present life, and if he would compensate for this
by the thought that God is nevertheless the final cause of all that happens, then his belief in God will be a theoretical speculation or a
dogma; and however great the force with
which he clings to this belief, it will not be true faith, for faith can be only the recognition of the activity of God in his own life.
By the fundamentalist Protestant type we mean those churches
which hold to the verbal inspiration and hence the literal inerrancy of the Bible, and
which defend as of vital importance certain creedal
dogmas, notably the virgin birth, the blood atonement, the physical resurrection of Christ, and his visible second coming.
This argument was made in criticism of Newbigin (1983) and is relevant to Newbigin (1986), who emphasizes Christian religion as
dogma which confronts culture to change it but is not itself changed
by that culture.
But, as I said, it's far more likely that he doesn't exist, in
which case it's simply the
dogma of man's religions
which are so fraught with contradictions, and
by extension, I don't have any trust, or any respect for those
dogmas either.
He was less concerned about the
dogmas and doctrines of the church that often only helped to torture Jesus
by dividing his community than about the plight of millions of people in this very world
which Jesus came to liberate.
Moreover, in the case
which concerns us, these are no longer determinations of a dogmatic pronouncement, but the reality affirmed
by dogma, as determination, of
which he proposes the reduction.
Descartes» major error, however, lies in his «unquestioned acceptance of the subject - predicate
dogma [
which] forced him into a representative theory of perception, involving a «judicium» validated
by our assurances of the power and the goodness of God» (PR 77f).
The guiding element in Teilhard's world view was his introduction of the evolutionary principle into God's relationship with man,
by means of
which he wove a vision that both broke from the traditional transcendence - immanence dualism and challenged many timeworn
dogmas of divine providence.
To the free trade
dogma, Graham adds the «free market
dogma [
which] has given Australia the duopoly of Woolworths and Coles who have driven farmers from the land
by reducing profit margins for producers to miniscule levels and requiring them to use every technical device available to maximise yields.»
Driven
by dogma and an obsession with short - term cuts, they are cutting off at the knees a sector
which grew at more than 7 per cent a year from 2010 to 2013, compared with less than 2 per cent for the UK economy as a whole.
And crucially he could not convincingly make the case for a social democrat country, given that his own time in government was beset
by the free market
dogma which has poisoned Labour and Tory administrations since Thatcher.
He finished
by lacerating the «austerity driven
by an outdated
dogma»
which was on offer from the opposition.
A new movie, Expelled, claims that intelligent design is good science that is being censored
by adherents to evolution,
which is nothing but Darwinian
dogma.
Don't be trapped
by dogma -
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma —
which is living with the results of other...
That said, the modern paleo movement also has a lot of
dogma that isn't supported
by the evidence, particularly regarding whole grains, legumes, and curious assertions of
which fats are and aren't healthy.
Don't be trapped
by dogma -
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
That was offset somewhat
by Dragon's
Dogma,
which «became a greater - than - expected hit product» in the highly profitable Japanese market; the company has sold more than 1 million copies worldwide.
In 1998 he was cast in A REASONABLE MAN directed
by Gavin Hood and then THE KING IS ALIVE, a
Dogma production
which was directed
by Kristian Levring and filmed in Namibia in 1999.
Don't be trapped
by dogma -
which is living with the results of other people's...
Don't be trapped
by dogma —
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma,
which is living with the results of other people's thinking.
The other two are (largely) created
by other Dragon's
Dogma players,
which makes for some goofy allies (I had a high level mage named Ladypants with me for most of my 37 hours) but makes the experience enjoyably personable.
Normally I don't get a weekend so these threads make me seethe with jealousy, but this weekend I have a THREE DAY weekend, so I'm going to pour it all into Dragon's
Dogma: DA,
which is far, far better than I was led to believe
by various smelly reviewers, and may in fact be the best open world RPG this gen. Long sentence over.
As in the Lettres de non-motivation (Letters of Non-Application) that he has been sending out to employers regularly since 2004 — in
which he responds to newspaper advertisements and details his reasons for not applying for the jobs in question — his work often appropriates the vocabulary, mechanisms and modus operandi of the sectors
by which it is informed, the better to highlight their
dogmas, excesses and, when all is said and done, their vacuousness.
Childish (and
by extension the curators at the ICA and White Columns in New York, who partner this exhibition) are right to question the
dogma of the art world, and particularly one in
which financial interests have been pushing a kind of superluxe glossy conceptualism to the fore.
Similarly, Ireland felt that the rules set forth
by contemporary painting
dogma (particularly Abstract Expressionism) created a standard
by which all art was viewed and evaluated; consequently everything in comparison was «experienced as illusion.»
To classify carbon dioxide as a pollutant is thus nothing short of scientific chicanery, for reasons that have nothing to do with science, but based purely on the pseudo-science so eagerly practised
by academia across the world in order to keep their funding sources open to the governmental decrees,
which are in turn based on totally false IPCC
dogma (yes,
dogma — not science).