Not exact matches
This is a
dumb argument because it's always over political power when mass murders happen
by political figures.
Yet again I am so amused
by the popular atheists who flock to articles like this to throw out words like «
dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused
arguments proposed
by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.
By presenting
arguments that will
dumb down our children?
I think it's a
dumb argument to make in a 7 - 0 game, though, where obviously whatever he would have done got thrown out the window
by midway through the game.
the money
argument first, with the caveat that N.J. uses a
dumb model, seemingly designed to incite animosity,
by having districts pay charter tuition directly from their coffers.
Seems like you love to create strawmen
by finding the
dumbest anti-AGW comments here and then attributing those
arguments to Dr. Curry unless she specifically rejects them.
It's bad enough that your
argument essentially consists of wholesale slander of scientists as liars, but employing a blatant falsehood not even supported
by your «sources» is downright
dumb and self - defeating.
However, because some
arguments are
dumb, does not imply that all
arguments are
dumb, and I'm more than happy to argue intelligently with people who have real issues to discuss — but right now those people are being drowned out
by the idiots, or the people who are using this to push their own personal agendas.
I'm always struck
dumb by the fundamental incompatibility of law and religion, the former valuing reasoned
argument and demonstrable proofs and the latter precluding reason and
argument and dependence on proofs.