All achievements are limited
by egoism, he said, but this is no excuse for fatalistic complacency.
He said the pessimist in him mocked his receipt of a degree in law when «law is ever more a hollow word, resonant but empty, in a world increasingly dominated by force, by violence, by fraud, by injustice, by avarice — in a word,
by egoism»; when civil law permits «the progressive and rapid increase of oppressed people who continue being swept toward ghettos, without work, without health, without instruction, without diversion and, not rarely, without God»; when under so - called international law «more than two - thirds of humanity (exist) in situations of misery, of hunger, of subhuman life»; and when agrarian law or spatial law permits «today's powerful landowners to continue to live at the cost of misery for unhappy pariahs»; and whereby «modern technology achieves marvels from the earth with an ever - reduced number of rural workers (while) those not needed in the fields live sublives in depressing slums on the outskirts of nearly all the large cities.»
Also, developing ideals are corrupted
by egoism.
Not exact matches
You cant trancend your own
egoism by cutting and pasting.
The belief in a personal god is no more and no less than human
egoism, fuelled
by a fear od death!
The sources of corporate estrangement are the same as those that produce the estrangement of the individual;
egoism, pride and the desire for power and domination
by a group or groups of people.
Egoism is only an unproven theory adopted
by the rich.
Setting up an archive
by mentioning in passing some of the relevant confusions, we can begin
by noting that in ethics we have just seen simple location leading to radical ethical
egoism.
Luther's insight that * sin * is not «man turned down toward the earth rather than up toward heaven» as the Catholic scholasticss taught; but was «man curved in upon himself» was an insight that has been confirmed
by contemporary psychology in its teaching on narcissistic
egoism.
It accuses the deliberate
egoism of an economy... in which each is the enemy of the other, because his advantage is conditioned
by the disadvantage or ruin of the other, and it demands an economy of solidarity of all, and of joy in work rather than in profit.
What therefore in the case of a man one would regard as a sign of
egoism and stupidity, that one is to regard
by the help of an exegete as a worthy conception of the Deity.
Luther was correct when he challenged the Medieval Catholic Scholastics over their teaching that * sin * was man turned down toward the things of earth rather than up towards the things of heaven
by teaching that * sin * was actually man turned in upon himself or, as modern mental health professions state «narcissistic
egoism, a disorder that closes us off from others rather than opening us up to them.
The moral issue to be decided here is not therefore that of
egoism versus altruism, or private versus social concern, but rather of what one means
by «
egoism» or, indeed,
by «social concern.»
«The only escape from the polarity of
egoism and altruism,» he says, «lies in the selflessness experienced
by those who lose themselves in their work, in the effort to master a craft or a body of knowledge, or in the acceptance of a formidable challenge that calls on all their resources.»
With insights from neuroscience, this theory argues that human nature is characterized
by emotionality, amorality, and
egoism, and that working for social cohesion and sustainable history requires careful consideration of the dignity needs of human beings.
This is so primarily because oftheemotional amoral
egoism nature of man, which is accentuated in today's world
by increased awareness, instant connectivity, empowerment
by information and communications technologies, and deepening transnational and transcultural interdependence.
As I have pointed out in previous works, human beings are characterized
by «emotional amoral
egoism».