a) that the bible is an imperfect human representation of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally
by evil humans or spirits
Not exact matches
What has Islam learn t??? It is err to
human, it require
evil intention to repeat it and that too sanctioned
by religion.
That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms limitations on God's power in relation to possible worlds containing free
human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual world devoid of beings with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that God could have created a world containing no
evil simply
by creating a world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).
Reviewing a book titled The Son of Man written
by François Mauriac (a French Roman Catholic who wrote about the problems of good and
evil in
human nature and in the world), Flannery O'Connor writes: He proposes in the place of that anguish that Gide called the Catholic's «cramp....
The classical response to nonmoral
evil we have been discussing begins
by affirming «C» omnipotence in relation to
humans and then argues that there do exist good reasons to believe that such a moral world would include instances of genuine nonmoral
evil and plausible reasons for assuming that such a world would have the types and amount of genuine nonmoral
evil we presently experience.
Or is it that
Evil is more like Anakin Skywalker being taken over by the «Dark Side» where the Evil that is in Anakin is manifested through the human Anakin and he becomes the evil Darth Va
Evil is more like Anakin Skywalker being taken over
by the «Dark Side» where the
Evil that is in Anakin is manifested through the human Anakin and he becomes the evil Darth Va
Evil that is in Anakin is manifested through the
human Anakin and he becomes the
evil Darth Va
evil Darth Vadar.
Creating the universe from nothing, forging a union of
human and divine natures, and causing the defeat of
evil — each of these events would involve full ontological determination
by God.
It's obvious
by reading this article you have never expirenced nor have you encountered «
evil» are a possessed
human being..
It is so obvious that: a) those held in slavery were
human beings (a biological category); b) all
humans are
by nature persons (a philosophic category), that is, beings with inviolable worth that ought never be treated as means to an end; and c) the
evil practice of slavery was not a private matter - the whole community is harmed because we are all communal beings
by nature, in solidarity with those who are treated unjustly.
The beasts receive their doom, and pass from the scene: the powers of
evil are overthrown, not
by any
human virtue or strength, but
by the presence and power of the living God.
No
human hands (he means) prepare the weapon
by which the power of
evil in the world will ultimately be overthrown: it is the act of God alone, whose kingdom will then be effective over all creation.
Given the enormous
evils that have been inflicted on
human beings and on the planet
by those who have understood themselves to be followers of Jesus, is it not a mistake to continue this tradition?
This disbelief in the value of the
human body was epitomised
by Thomas Hobbes, who wrote: «Man is in the condition of mere nature, which is a condition of war, as private appetite is the measure of good and
evil».
That statement is why religion is pure
evil and the
human race has been consumed
by war for thousands of years.
By locating the discussion of
evil in the context of the entire cosmic complex, one may overlook the particular powerful role that
human beings increasingly play in bringing
evil to their own species and to other species as well.
By the deliberate choice of
evil, the first generation of
human beings did not just lose «preternatural gifts», they tore themselves away from their true source of control and direction, damaging their own integration and ontological harmony as creatures of body and soul.
Although we are quite in the dark about the why of
human disease and suffering, ordinary observation can show us that the result of their occurrence is
by no means necessarily
evil.
While we do not claim that
human beings are enslaved
by sin, we are aware of the great capacity that
humans have for
evil as well as for good.
I think scripture is a rich metaphor created
by human in an attempt to understand the presence of
evil in the world, as well as to express their hope that it will end.
In that too satan has his fingers, because he knows that if he can deceive many to think they won't be here in those times of great Tribulation, then he can take them unprepared
by surprise, and many will be deceived, thinking it can't be HIM, because they've been told they won't be here... But what we are seeing today, is an Army being prepared, an unholy army, and that's why such rampant
evil is engulfing the
human race.
Although I am very far from subscribing to the doctrine of the total depravity of man, it does seem to me to have been proved within my own lifetime that the problem of
human evil is not much affected
by better education, better housing, higher wages, holidays with pay, and the National Health Service — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
In the encyclical Aeterni Patris Leo XIII wrote that «a fruitful causeof the
evils which now afflict, as well as of those which threaten us, lies in this: that false conclusions concerning divine and
human things, which originated in the schools of philosophy, have crept into all the orders of the State, and have been accepted
by the common consent of the masses.»
As reports of civilian casualties mount, we see that, just as Jesus warned,
human attempts to «root out
evil» on our own,
by force, result in the destruction of innocent lives.
Neither system is invoked
by name, but in their complete violation, the novel presents not a world in which
evil has triumphed, but one in which the basic obligations of
humans as social beings — to establish civil society and recourse for its governance — are ignored.
A God who creates
humans who
by definition must be
evil because t hey are not God.
Hitler figured out a way to exterminate people based purely on a choice they made
by free will (their religious affiliation), he only killed a few million people and he is considered the embodiment of
human evil.
Historically, the
human condition has been blighted
by evil — horrendous torture, death, mutilation, betrayal, deception, hatred, prejudice, arrogance, and holocaust.
«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately with
evil in the world, in Israel, and in
human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and
human beings... When full allowance is made for the striking differences of genre and emphasis within scripture, we may propose that Israel's sacred writings were the place where, and the means
by which, Israel discovered again and again who the true God was, and how his Kingdom - purposes were being taken forward... Through scripture, God was equipping his people to serve his purposes.»
It seems to have been proved within out time that the problem of
human evil is not much affected
by better education, better housing, higher wages, and holidays with pay — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
I suppose that's where we'll have to part ways, tiggy: I believe that
human beings ARE bad,
evil even,
by nature and inclination.
Therefore, whilst ALL
human beings — Christian or not — are sinful and fallen and
evil, they are also «good» through Jesus» goodness, His obedience is counted as ours
by God, forensically.
It is notoriously hard to make goodness compelling, whereas the
human imagination is gripped
by stories of
evil.
The great issues of our time are moral: the uses of power; wealth and poverty;
human rights; the moral quality and character of society; loss of the sense of the common good in tandem with the pampering of private interests; domestic violence; outrageous legal and medical costs in a system of maldistributed services; unprecedented developments in biotechnologies which portend good but risk
evil; the violation of public trust
by high elected officials and their appointees; the growing militarization of many societies; continued racism; the persistence of hunger and malnutrition; a still exploding population in societies hard put to increase jobs and resources; abortion; euthanasia; care for the environment; the claims of future generations.
The basis of your belief system appears to be that, you will go to a place of eternal fire and torture, unless you accept that 2000 years ago god sent a piece of himself to Earth in
human form (Jesus) knowing in advance that this Jesus would live, be crucified, died, then come alive again, then ascend to heaven to rejoin himself, and that this was the only way that
humans could be cleansed of the
evil that is inherent in them because a rib woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat an apple.
Does this new finding prove an invisible, all powerful, magic man who lives in the sky had an
evil talking snake tempt a woman, made from a rib, to disobey him, whereby he put a curse on all future humanity, then later changed his mind and decides to lift his curse
by impregnating a
human woman with himself and having himself tortured, killed, and raised from the dead, so that if you believe all that, you get to live forever in heaven after you die, but if you don't, he will torture you forever in hell?
Study of Scripture through the filter of man's biases results in the type of man - centered ideas proferred
by Baden, like «God learns to accept their inherently
evil nature», and
humans «are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices», and «it is, rather, our job to make ourselves uncomfortable that he might be appeased.»
Most of the world's
evil is man - made; it is precipitated either
by «man's inhumanity to man» or
by human ignorance or carelessness.
But
human beings an qualified
by moral and cognitive
evil.
many religious people are not Christians, and even Christians who are still only
human get distracted
by the flesh and do stupid or you could say
evil things.
Just because
evil is always relative does not mean we as
humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative
evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way
by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»
Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to kill those other
humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen»
by God like you... that is the true face of
evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.
Prepare your selves for the worse coming now others will try to copycat him... shame really that
human is over taken
by the
evil forces whether he is Religious or non religious... killing is
evil.
evil.
evil..
This notion of the demonic, especially when it is developed to explain the widespread proclivity of
human beings to
evil (through being born into cultures more or less dominated
by demonic habits, symbols, beliefs, and attitudes), provides a further basis for reconciling God's goodness with the world's
evil.
«Good» is the movement in the direction of home, «
evil» is the aimless whirl of
human potentialities without which nothing can be achieved and
by which, if they take no direction but remain trapped in themselves, everything goes awry.
To talk in that fashion is not to speak of a kind of meaningless re-enactment of what went on in the creation; it is to speak of a vital, living, and ongoing movement, where God knows and experiences (if that word is, as I believe, appropriate to the divine life) that which has taken place, but knows it and experiences it with a continuing freshness and delight — and, if what has taken place has been
evil, with a continuing tinge of sadness and regret — such as must be proper to the chief creative and chief receptive agency who is worshiped and served
by God's
human children.
Therefore one can not say that
human nature has been fundamentally affected
by sin or transformed into
evil.
Daniel, which influenced them all, was itself influenced
by Zoroastrian teaching on the Last Judgment, the battle between good and
evil in which
humans and angels participate, the punishment of evildoers
by fire, elements not present elsewhere in Old Testament tradition.
It hopes to escape
evil not
by fleeing the world, but
by stepping away in distrust, securing the independent power of the mind through the scientific method, and then turning against the world with a vengeance and transforming it to suit the
human will.
69 The biblical interpretation of
human history rejects the pathetic (the pain caused
by unthinking natural
evil) and the tragic (a conscious choice of
evil for the sake of good) for the ironic (
evil resulting from man's wrong use of his unique capacities).
I agree with the inference made
by GAW, that both science and religion are capable of influencing good or
evil outcomes — which leads us to the motives of the
human heart... and back to religion.