Sentences with phrase «by family law courts»

In circumstances where interference with child custody is handled by the family law courts, judges will have a number of remedies available to address the situation.
Mediation is required by family law courts in many counties in South Carolina.
A guideline to enhance the relationship between the Family Law Courts and Children's Contact Services and to facilitate the appropriate use of Children's Contact Services by the Family Law Courts.
For this reason, joint custody is heavily favored by family law courts in all states, but it is not always the best option, especially if a child of divorce is quite young.
There is a diverse population serviced by the family law courts.
(7) limitations on the lawyer's participation in subsequent proceedings imposed by family law court rules on the collaborative law process.
If you want to modify an order handed down by a family law court, you will need to file a petition for modification.

Not exact matches

The governor said he would seek to strengthen state laws to prevent the purchase or possession of weapons by any adult «when either a family member, community welfare expert or law enforcement officer files a sworn request and presents evidence to the court of a threat of violence involving firearms or other weapons.»
And as Islamic law forbids a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man (although it permits a Muslim man to marry a non-Muslim woman), her marriage was not a marriage at all in Sudan, where matters of personal and family law are controlled by religious courts.
But one must also consider the roles played by institutions (the cult, the school, the court of law, the state), family and kinship groups and key leaders (including the prophets and the sages).
Ahead of Marriage Week we look at an article by former family law court judge Paul Coleridge on why marriage is always the best option for children.
What is more, they can be greatly helped if they see that this is indeed the chief stress in public prayer or church worship, so that such social praying is undertaken by a family of God's children addressing a loving Father (who makes demands upon them, to be sure, but who is no hateful dictator nor absentee ruler nor moral tyrant, but genuinely concerned for their best development as his children), rather than a kind of law - court or imperial audience with a terrifying deity.
Until recent years, husbands hitting their spouses in the US was considered «reasonable chastisement of wives» and «a private family matter» by the courts and by law enforcement even though it has technically been against the law in all fifty states for decades.
Robert McDonnell, who had vigorously asserted his innocence, said in his statement that he appreciated the Justice Department «applying the correct rule of law articulated by the Supreme Court» and «for doing justice for me, my family, my friends, my Commonwealth and its servants, and for all those involved in the democratic process.»
Ulster County Attorney Bea Havranek, whose office prosecutes crimes committed by youths, in Family Court, said Wednesday that it was «premature» to say whether the law would have an impact on her office.
Under the proposed measure, family members or law enforcement could petition a court for «Extreme Risk Protection Orders,» which, if granted, would allow officers to temporarily confiscate firearms and prevent the purchase of additional weapons by those deemed at risk of causing harm to themselves or others.
The Edelstein family, whose «Imperial Court Hotel» was fined thousands of dollars by the city for violating zoning laws, collectively donated $ 25,000 to Greenfield.
The Family Law Court is not going to be influenced by misinformation placed in the social media based on anonymous sources.
Joining us are Jessica Pinson Pennington, executive director of the Truancy Intervention Project in Georgia, and Barbara Babb and Gloria Danziger of the Truancy Court Program organized by the Center for Families, Children and the Courts at the University of Baltimore School of Law.
One morning near the end of the school year, I sat in on a string of meetings between students at Francis Scott Key middle school in Silver Spring, Maryland, and a group of adults — a family - court judge, a district attorney, a school social worker — who are part of a truancy project sponsored by the University of Baltimore School of Law.
In «Fighting Truancy: Voices from the trenches,» Ed Next talks with Jessica Pinson Pennington, executive director of the Truancy Intervention Project in Georgia, and Barbara Babb and Gloria Danziger of the Truancy Court Program organized by the Center for Families, Children and the Courts at the University of Baltimore School of Law.
There is almost universally no mention of the fundamental issue of children being so stressed out and distracted from learning due to dysfunctional families and how such families are so severely impacted by the broken family policies, laws, and courts in this country.
Changes introduced in the Family Law Legislation Amendment (Superannuation) Act 2001 allow a super interest to be divided by agreement or a court order following marriage breakdown.
We're hopeful that Georgia's Supreme Court will join other courts across the nation in recognizing that when beloved family members like Lola are negligently injured or killed, their value must be reflected in the damages their families are entitled to by law
725 I.L.C.S. 5 / 112A -14 This Illinois law allows a court to issue an order of protection if the court finds that petitioner has been abused by a family or household member.
Under this Connecticut law, any family or household member who has been subjected to a continuous threat of present physical pain or physical injury by another family may apply to the Superior Court for an order of protection.
Chief Justice Heather Smith of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice listed several initiatives by the court to improve familyCourt of Justice listed several initiatives by the court to improve familycourt to improve family law:
The Court further pointed out that as «the duration of an asylum procedure may be relevant and that, in particular in periods of substantial surges in applications for international protection, the time laid down by EU law are often exceed it» making the right to family reunification depend upon the moment when the asylum procedure is closed would de facto have the effect of nullifying that right and the protection under Article 10 (3)(a)(para 57).
Posted Wednesday, January 17th, 2018 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Thursday, June 21st, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Legislation, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific 7 Comments»
Posted Monday, October 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Guardians Ad Litem, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys
Posted Sunday, September 20th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Specific
Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation
Posted Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Visitation 6 Comments»
Posted Wednesday, June 20th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Sunday, April 24th, 2016 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public
The division of family property in family law court actions commenced after March 18, 2013, is governed by the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the family property in family law court actions commenced after March 18, 2013, is governed by the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the family law court actions commenced after March 18, 2013, is governed by the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the Coulaw court actions commenced after March 18, 2013, is governed by the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the Ccourt actions commenced after March 18, 2013, is governed by the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the Family Law Act, and previous decisions of the CouLaw Act, and previous decisions of the CourtCourt.
Posted Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Alimony / Spousal Support, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys No Comments»
Posted Thursday, March 27th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Thursday, January 30th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific 4 Comments»
Posted Thursday, May 15th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Divorce and Marriage, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 10 Comments»
Posted Thursday, November 17th, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Alimony / Spousal Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Alimony / Spousal Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions No Comments»
Posted Friday, March 16th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
For this argument to succeed, Mr. Grenon was required to show, as articulated by the Supreme Court in Withler v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12 (CanLII), first, that the law in question created a distinction based on a ground enumerated in section 15 (i.e. sex), or a ground analogous thereto (i.e. family status).
Going to Family Court Without a Lawyer by The Family Law Workshop Thur.
Posted Friday, March 16th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Friday, May 21st, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney - Client Relations, Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 3 Comments»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z