Sentences with phrase «by following a court»

They proclaimed that the loyalty of the American people to constitutional ideas would be «tested» by following the Court's resolution of the abortion controversy.

Quoting from the dissenting opinion of the appeals court judge, he writes: «While it may be true that by following the Court of Appeals» conclusion as to the ambiguity of «research,» this Court has become a grudging partner in a bout of «linguistic jujitsu,»... such is life for an antepenultimate court.»

It is only officially adopted by the following courts:

Chapter 13 bankruptcy, also known as «reorganization,» offers financial relief by giving people three - five years to catch up on debts by following a court - outlined repayment plan.

However, despite the usefulness of this free database from SOQUIJ, realize that it is quite limited in scope, providing by my count translations of only 395 decisions broken down by the following courts / tribunals (with the number indicating the total number of translations as of today's date):

The not for profit publisher was established in 1865 and they have 29 law reporters that cover cases decided by the following courts and tribunals: the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council; the Court of Justice of the European Union; the Court of Appeal (Civil and Criminal Divisions); the High Court; the Court of Protection; the Employment Appeal Tribunal; the Upper Tribunal; the Court Martial Appeal Court; and the English ecclesiastical courts.

However, most of the time, matrimonial property will be divided between the spouses during the divorce proceedings, either through an agreement or by following a Court Order.

Not exact matches

The bold phrases are my summary of the changes, while the indented text is taken from the original summons followed by the limits set out in the July 6 court filing.

Baazov, who was not in court on Monday, has pleaded not guilty to securities - related charges following an investigation by Quebec's stock market regulator.

The following year, Monaco filed suit against the State of Mississippi in the U.S. Supreme Court, but the high court refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rCourt, but the high court refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rcourt refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rCourt has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.»

Yesterday, Harrison highlighted his yen for efficiency (and perhaps courted Norfolk Southern shareholders) by declaring that some of Norfolk's rail yards are «not needed» and would be quickly sold off following a merger.

The Supreme Court's ruling in a discrimination suit brought by a Muslim woman creates a conundrum for employers trying to follow fair hiring practices.

That hearing was followed up by Trump announcing his seventh wave of judicial nominees, an additional 15 names that are about to be submitted to the Senate, bringing the total number of district and circuit court judges he's nominated to roughly 50 — blowing far past the number of judicial nominations made at this stage of a presidency by any recent predecessors.

SINGAPORE, April 29 - Noble Group will set a date for a special meeting to seek shareholder approval for a $ 3.4 billion debt restructuring after a Singapore court blocked its scheduled annual meeting following legal action by a dissident shareholder.

The SEC's muzzling of Citi followed an appeal the regulator filed two weeks earlier in response to a trial ordered by the lower court.

That was to be followed by another court hearing to approve the scheme of arrangement, which was scheduled to be implemented in February.

We collect the 10 most sarcastic, funny and bewildered reactions the independent news agency had when it was trolled by mistake following the Supreme Court ruling yesterday.

However, the state is Uber's home base, one of its largest markets, and sets a path often followed by regulators and courts in other states.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of the issue.

The French decision follows the May ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Mario Costeja González, a Spanish man who succeeded in ordering Google to remove links to an old article saying that his home was being repossessed to pay off debts.

Herman's first three calls were to the research desks of Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs, and after their conversations, all three banks cut their estimates of Facebook's annual revenue by between 3.01 % and 3.33 % — perfectly aligned with Herman's notes, as the following charts from court documents show:

«This morning, following the re-opening, we were notified of a deed by the court of Florence requesting the immediate closure of BitGrail and this situation will persist until a decision is made by the courts, about the precautionary suspension request made by the Bonelli law office on behalf of a client.»

YAC's solicitors told the Supreme Court of Western Australia on the 21 January that it would not continue with its intention to hold a General Meeting of Electors on 1 February following a challenge by WMYAC as to the validity of the meeting.

It was the only significant new word from the top level of leadership at Facebook following the full - court press made by Mark Zuckerberg yesterday.

South32 said there has been no disruption to production following a ruling by the Colombian Constitutional Court that the mine had caused health problems and environmental damage for local communities.

The Court ruling was made clear following a complaint by a Swedish entrepreneur wanting to provide a service on a Bitcoin exchange which involved other traditional currencies.

In previous cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to follow a court ruling.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of...

Unless we are prohibited from doing so by any applicable law, regulation, court order or instruction or guidance of a competent regulatory authority or agency, in terminating your account we may do any of the following at our sole discretion: A. transfer the funds back to the source; or B. convert your account balance to Bitcoins at our then - prevailing rate, subject to applicable fees and as soon as practicable give you 48 hours» notice that we intend to deactivate your account, requesting that you provide us with an alternative bitcoin wallet address to which we can transfer your bitcoin within that period (the «Redemption Period»);

In support of its restructuring and in order to satisfy its obligations under the plan of reorganization confirmed by the bankruptcy court, the Company closed the following financing transactions:

On Thursday, Weinstein continued his bid in Delaware Bankruptcy Court to obtain personal and business records kept by The Weinstein Co. — a firm which he helped set up but which dismissed him in October following multiple complaints about his alleged sexual exploitation of women.

Instead, they are required to go through the company's predetermined arbitration process, which usually entails the following: (1) they are usually bound to keep completely silent about the unlawful treatment that they experienced at the company and the entire arbitration process, (2) they are not allowed to exercise their constitutional rights to the public court system, (3) the arbitrator is usually chosen by the company.

Central to this Court - led revolution is the idea that the Constitution is in a state of more or less perpetual evolution, whence it follows that judges need not be bound by the precise words of the document, or by prior precedent, or by settled historical meaning.

After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children

Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

It is comparable to the arrogance of the Supreme Court in the 1992 Casey decision, when it declared that not the Court but the character of the nation is being «tested» by whether or not it follows the Court's five - to - four edict in support of the abortion license.

A practicing lawyer, advising a legislative committee or governor, would predict the following: the law would meet immediate legal challenge and be struck down by a federal district court, which would be affirmed by the court of appeals.

The government followed the court's ruling by noting a few hours later that the judgment applied only to the Catholic paper in question.

The SCOTUS should conclude the following thereby ending this continuing waste of tax payers» money by trying these cases in court:

Deya was initially arrested in the UK in December 2006 following the issuing of an international arrest warrant by the chief magistrates» court in Nairobi.

It follows that the minister may be forced to violate the sanctity of the confessional by testifying at the police station, in a pretrial hearing, in court, before a grand jury or even before the legislature.

The recommendation follows claims made by a top officer at Scotland Yard that the courts and prisons aren't doing enough to tackle knife - related crime.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 26) provide that in the absence of statute or rule, the court shall follow «the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience.»

What we've seen here is kidnapping, now followed by a kangaroo court.

The Federal Court has ordered Woolworths Limited (Woolworths) to pay penalties totalling $ 9 million for contraventions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (now called the Competition and Consumer Act 2010)(the Act), following admissions made by Woolworths in proceedings brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

The Court declared that Coles engaged in unconscionable conduct in the implementation of its Active Retail Collaboration (ARC) program by making threats of the following consequences if suppliers declined to pay the ARC rebate:

Top your adventures off with a trip to our spa followed by some sipping and savoring at our award - winning restaurants, lounges and tea room and you'll start to see why just one stay at Windsor Court Hotel isn't enough.

The Australian Financial Review can reveal that, following a court hearing last Friday, the class action law firm will release to the ASX an annual notice of meeting and explanatory material, including an independent experts report by KPMG that finds the recapitalisation to be «fair and reasonable».

Following a complaint by former Victorian premier Jeff Kennett, the ACCC will ask the Federal Court to ban Coles from selling any product promoted as baked fresh — including «baked today, sold today», «freshly baked» and «freshly baked in - store».