Propelled
by fossil fuel pollution, climate change has sent global temperatures soaring.
The Department of Health must produce by Dec. 2018 a cumulative impact analysis to designate communities highly impacted
by fossil fuel pollution and climate change in Washington.
Not exact matches
Tens of thousands of Americans die every year from old - fashioned air
pollution, generated
by electric power plants that burn
fossil fuels.
Air
pollution has historically been caused
by industrialisation and the consequent proliferation in the use of «
fossil fuels» (and therefore sulphur dioxide emissions) in the industrial process.
We could make a bold commitment to invest in renewable energy, one that will get us off
fossil fuels completely and provide tens of thousands of new jobs — especially in the communities most impacted
by pollution and climate change.
However, at least two of the state's nuclear reactors are in danger of closing within the next few years and would significantly increase air
pollution because they would be replaced
by fossil -
fuel burning power plants in the near future.
We will gain something, though: millions of tons of carbon
pollution pumped into our air
by the likeliest alternative,
fossil fuels.
Reducing carbon
pollution 80 percent
by 2050 means that in just 34 years there will be no more
fossil fuels burned in New York.
Reducing carbon
pollution 80 percent
by 2050 means that in just 34 years there will be no more
fossil fuels burned in New York,» stated Bambrick.
If the mathematics of the
pollution produced
by burning a gallon of
fossil fuel seems daunting, it's even worse to look the other way: what went into making that gallon.
Electric power generated
by renewable energy sources causes substantially less
pollution than energy generated from
fossil fuels, the report says.
Today, electricity generation is buffeted
by numerous factors: access to
fossil fuels, peak oil, nuclear security and proliferation,
pollution, and climate change.
The position paper on air
pollution and cardiovascular disease was written
by experts from the European Society of Cardiology and also recommends decreasing the use of
fossil fuels.
And the team gets its rosy results even though it didn't add in the health and environmental costs of the
pollution created
by burning
fossil fuels.
For the industrial era, Lovejoy's analysis uses carbon - dioxide from the burning of
fossil fuels as a proxy for all man - made climate influences - a simplification justified
by the tight relationship between global economic activity and the emission of greenhouse gases and particulate
pollution, he says.
Indeed, he has evidence: the speediest drop in greenhouse gas
pollution on record occurred in France in the 1970s and «80s, when that country transitioned from burning
fossil fuels to nuclear fission for electricity, lowering its greenhouse emissions
by roughly 2 percent per year.
But the economic tradeoffs in the natural marketplace are becoming unbalanced
by nutrient
pollution, most of which can be traced back to nitrogen fertilizers and
fossil -
fuel consumption.
Seven million people died prematurely in 2012 from air
pollution caused
by fossil fuel combustion, according to a 2014 report
by the World Health Organization.
It is stupid to use irreplaceable
fossil fuels to produce food with the
by - product of carbon dioxide
pollution, when we can do the same using energy from sunlight and actually remove CO2 from the atmosphere.
But calculating the costs associated with premature death caused
by air
pollution is complex and has resulted in very different estimates: because of the different methodologies used, the cost of air
pollution related to
fossil fuel consumption is estimated to be three times higher in the US than the EU.
Last year Greenpeace revealed that Willie Soon is exclusively funded
by fossil fuel interests like Koch Industries, ExxonMobil and Southern Company, a major contributor to mercury air
pollution from its coal plants.
Air and water
pollution from
fossil fuel extraction and use have high costs in human health, food production, and natural ecosystems, killing more than 1,000,000 people per year and affecting the health of billions of people [232], [234], with costs borne
by the public.
Gainesville, FL About Blog Sun Power Lawn Care is an electric mowing service that is powered
by solar energy, reducing noise and
fossil fuel pollution.
What ensues is a tragic tale of love, a fight against
pollution and the greed of consuming
fossil fuels, and the existential crises wrought
by massive amounts of drug dosing.
As here, refuting Jon Kirwan's concern (# 150): «the speediest drop in greenhouse gas
pollution on record occurred in France in the 1970s and «80s, when that country transitioned from burning
fossil fuels to nuclear fission for electricity, lowering its greenhouse emissions
by roughly 2 percent per year.»
If you want to assume that aerosols resulting from
pollution produced
by the burning of
fossil fuels were responsible for the cooling evident from 1940 through the late 70's, then you have no reason to claim ANY degree of warming due to CO2 forcing during any earlier period.
The level «
pollution produced
by the burning of
fossil fuels» is not determined
by the amount of FF you burn but
by what sort of FF you burn and how you burn it.
A vast number of scientists, engineers, and visionary businessmen are boldly designing a future that is based on low - impact energy pathways and living within safe planetary boundaries; a future in which substantial health gains can be achieved
by eliminating
fossil -
fuel pollution; and a future in which we strive to hand over a liveable planet to posterity.
311 MARodger: «The level «
pollution produced
by the burning of
fossil fuels» is not determined
by the amount of FF you burn but
by what sort of FF you burn and how you burn it.»
But Obama faces a reality that many of these groups seem slow to recognize: While the 20th - century toolkit preferred
by traditional environmentalists — litigation, regulation and legislation — remains vital to limiting domestic
pollution risks such as the oil gusher, it is a bad fit for addressing the building human influence on the climate system, which is driven now mainly
by a surge in emissions mostly outside United States borders in countries aiming to propel their climb out of poverty on the same
fossil fuels that generated much of our affluence.
The primary source of NO2
pollution is the burning of
fossil fuels, especially
by coal - fired power plants and diesel engine cars, like those in the Volkswagen emissions-gate scandal.
Those who got rich
by burning
fossil fuels have taken up the available atmospheric space for carbon
pollution, leaving little for the rest.
According to a new report
by Greenpeace, not only is CCS an extraordinarily expensive, commercially - unproven technology, «CCS proposals maintain our dependence on
fossil fuels and exacerbate climate
pollution.»
Wind farms reduce greenhouse emissions
by displacing
fossil fuelled power stations and they save lives
by reducing the air
pollution from the burning of
fossil fuels that kills millions of people each year.
An APS press release from June 1, 2016 says it is requesting $ 3.6 billion in upgrades and maintenance for the grid; and then lists $ 500M for Ocotillo gas plant refurbishing, plus $ 400M for the 1,636 MW Four Corners coal plant, but rate case testimony
by APS general manager of
fossil fuel generation John Lucas states that APS will spend $ 435 million on
pollution control (Selective Catalytic Reduction or SCR) for Four Corners.
For example, traffic
pollution has been dramatically reduced
by adoption of
fossil fuels.
Many are doubly hard - hit
by the
fossil -
fuel economy — disproportionately hurt
by its
pollution and climate impacts, yet largely excluded from its economic benefits.
REMI concluded that CCL's proposal would create between 2.1 to 2.8 million jobs, reduce carbon
pollution by 50 %, increase household incomes, save up to 230,000 lives that would otherwise be lost from the
pollution of burning
fossil fuels, and add up to 1.3 trillion more to the GDP over a 20 year period.
Friedman... would have viewed climate change as a negative externality associated with burning
fossil fuels and would have believed that society was entitled to recover its losses from those who emit carbon to advance their economic interests... While there is a market for the products that are associated with greenhouse gas emissions — like electricity,
fuel and steel — there is no market for the
pollution inflicted
by their manufacturers on the public.
The introduction of machines powered
by cheap and easily accessible
fossil fuels led to a decline in the use of wind power, but since reserves of these
fuels are finite and as the world becomes more conscious of the
pollution generated
by these
fuels, focus has turned once again to tapping this free source of energy.
Here's a story we all now know well: A small number of groups backed
by the
fossil fuel industry have for decades shed doubt on the science of climate change, even as the actual scientific community consensus on the issue — that greenhouse gas
pollution posed a significant threat to our climate — remained strong and continued to grow stronger.
Even with the Guardian's welcome campaign, the world still needs a transparent price on carbon
pollution to strangle demand for
fossil fuels by replacing them with non-carbon alternatives.
It's the vast majority of climate scientists vs (in this particular case) a front group for activities
by PR disinformation specialists, financed indirectly
by fossil fuel companies and others opposed to regulation of GHG emission
pollution.]
For too long, oil companies have reaped massive profits through a monopoly over our transportation options, leaving people with few alternatives to
fossil fuels —
fuels which are
by far Washington's largest source of climate and air
pollution.
Increasing solar power would help protect public health
by reducing harmful air
pollution from the state's
fossil fuel - fired power plants.
Unfortunately for the
fossil fuel industry, natural gas only reduces
pollution by 55 % (compared to coal) at the power plant, and only
by 17 % (compared to gasoline) out of car tailpipes.
Reduced demand for
fossil fuels will improve the environment
by reducing air and water
pollution as well as the heat - trapping gases that cause global warming.
Cement, which is mostly commonly composed of calcium silicates, requires heating limestone and other ingredients to 2,640 degrees F (1,450 degrees C)
by burning
fossil fuels and is the third largest source of greenhouse gas
pollution in the U.S., according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
They ignore the fact that the wind farm will increase health (and reduce deaths) in Australia
by reducing the air
pollution from
fossil -
fuelled power stations.
UBS analysts say utilities in Europe need to shut down 30 % of their gas, coal, and oil - fed power capacity
by 2017, not to fight global warming, cut
pollution, or cut
fuel imports, but because renewable energy is pushing
fossil fuels off the grid.