Sentences with phrase «by fundamentalist christian»

Frankly the APPG is in danger of turning into a religious sect overwhelmingly directed by the fundamentalist Christian wing of the Conservative parliamentary party, which I think is utterly deplorable.

«Frankly the all - party group is in danger of turning into a religious sect overwhelmingly directed by the fundamentalist Christian wing of the Conservative parliamentary party.»

I do not agree with many of the social & political beliefs expounded by fundamentalist Christian organizations, but it was Christ who defined Christianity, not the fundamentalists & not the social justice Christians.

Were you home schooled by fundamentalist Christian parents who didn't want you in an environment where you might learn critical thinking skills?

I can't really cite things I've heard said verbally in churches or at talks and I don't tend to read books by fundamentalist Christians — not many anyway.

Yet i have to read words by fundamentalist Christians such as «Hell» «damnation» and «unsaved».

The Q'uran is seen by fundamentalist Muslims, and the Bible is seen by fundamentalist Christians, to be completely inerrant.

Not exact matches

I beleive that Liberal Socialists who feel threatened by Christian Evangelical Fundamentalists fear their political power so much, that even President Obama is a blind naive proponent of tollerance to Islamic Shariah Law as he funded the Great Iman of NYC.

And one that I personally wouldn't feel impunged by, but would be taken personally by many, is your last assertion that most fundamentalists are a) not Christian (by what definition is unclear) and b) either jerks or desiring «a society that revolves around a dictatorial, patriarchal system».

Muslim fundamentalists destroyed the great culture that was medieval Islam by withdrawing from learning and focusing inward on faith; now, the christian fundamentalists are trying to do the same.

You are dishonest to yourself if you do not acknowledge that this is possible: You where by your own acount in a stressfull state and you had been raised in a christian family, associated with a fundamentalist church, attended bible college, proffesing christianity for years and looking for answers in your church and faith.

The definition of irony is christian fundamentalists raking Islam through the mud when their religion was started by an Arab in the same part of the world.

It's not interesting because it was almost certainly a joke to annoy some fundamentalist Christian pro-lifer who had been falsely accusing these people of being influenced by Satan.

He's the Christian revisionist author embraced by fundamentalist believers.

Most Western Christians, especially fundamentalists, define what it means to be human by the Original Sin, not the Original Blessing — which is not only unbiblical, but puts the emphasis on the human rather than Divine action.

You fundamentalist born - again Christians claiming to be offended by these «false prophets» really ought to regard them more closely, because they're exactly what you look like to the rest of the world.

Perhaps some business owned by a Christian fundamentalist will start denying coverage for prenatal and obstetrical care for unmarried female employees who get pregnant.

Honey, by far most Christians, who by the way are not fundamentalists, do not care if you beleive or not.

If you are a fundamentalist Christian, you will probably be offended at the humorous approach Steve Wells takes in his book, Drunk With Blood, by pointing out all the violence of Scripture, but I think that humor is the only way to write a 300 - page book detailing all the violence in the Christian Scriptures.

The Zionist Organization of America said: «Christian fundamentalists are by and large supporters of Israel and we are not selective when it comes to mobilising support.»

Muslim fundamentalists give unwavering support to the Palestinians, while the claims of Israel are strongly defended by Christian and Jewish fundamentalists.

There are two main areas in which Christian fundamentalism endangers our human future: its domination of the churches by what may be called «the fundamentalist captivity of Christianity», and its uncritical support of the «axis of power» exercised by America and Israel.

The more strictly the tenets of a particular religious sect are pushed on us, such as by Christian fundamentalists, the more we see conflict between democracy and religion.

It is fascinating that the movement would arise in the American branch of the Hebrew Christian Alliance (HCAA), an organization that has consistently assuaged the fears of fundamentalist Christians by emphasizing that it is not a separate denomination but only an evangelistic arm of the evangelical church.

In the light of this definition, we may ask if the attempts of various fundamentalist groups of different religions (including Christian fundamentalists) to crush the boundary by destroying the cultural differences be considered mission.

I am astounded by those calling themselves Christian (such as Elisabeth, others that say, «I'm fundamentalist, not literalist») and their disbelief.

FOX news is reporting that radical fundamentalist Tea Party patriot «heroes» have defended freedom in a very Christian and Second Amendment way against the «Islamo - Fascist Communist Libtard Socialist Kenyan - by - birth squirrel - homo Bippy», while CBS is reporting that Bippy was the victim of one Cleetus Joe Dogwanker of Klanton, Mississississississippippippississippi, who they are reporting simply saw a good opportunity for an afternoon snack of deep - fried - chocolate - covered - bacon - wrapped - squirrel - roadkill - on - a-stick, and of course, CNN is reporting on WalMart unveiling Black Friday deals.

But experts on European politics and religion say that the Christian fundamentalist label could overstate the extent to which the suspect, Anders Behring Breivik - who has told authorities that he carried out the attacks - was motivated by religion, and the extent to which he is tied to a broader religious movement.

(CNN)- Given initial suspicions that Friday's bombing and mass shooting in Norway were carried out by Islamic militants linked to al Qaeda, the way police ended up describing the suspect behind the attacks came as a big surprise even to many security experts: The alleged attacker was called a «Christian fundamentalist.»

The sad thing is these intolerant Christian fundamentalists actually think they're being moral, good, decent people by discriminating.

It reminds me so much of the (incorrect) statement made by some fundamentalists that if a person «looses» their Christian faith, they never really had it to begin with.

Thus, having started as the name of a Christian phenomenon in America, the term «fundamentalist» began to spread throughout the world, for what it pointed to was by no means confined to the Christian West.

Yes, when it comes to things like percentages of «Christians» as a majority of Americans the tent is extended as large as it can get, but in other issues the t.itle «Christian» seems to be claimed by a very small group of fundamentalists who have great conviction that Mormons, Catholics, mainstream protestants and orthodox aren't really Christians like they are and thus doomed to the same hellish fate that other non-Christians are.

oh great make a blog where the point is to show how ironic the belief system of the christian fundamentalist is by praising gay people and making fun of fat people!

It is also commonly displayed by people or groups whose beliefs actually are comparatively widespread, such as fundamentalist Christians.

By the way, I have a B.A. in Philosophy / Theology from Point Loma Nazarene University (a school known for having some very liberal theology professors (not a fundamentalist Christian school).

@ Nii — your prior comments certainly led me to believe that you believe that being g - ay, or acting in accordance with that se - xual orientation, somehow involves moral choice — a belief held by — in my experience — a large percentage of christian fundamentalists.

Well, the bigotry by the extremist christian fundamentalists * is * starting to excellerate.

She has closely examined fundamentalist rhetoric in several «texts»: Falwell's own biography, fund - raising for Liberty Baptist College, the public language used by conservative Christians during the 1980s, Falwell's «stump sermon» on morality and politics, pro-life writings, interpretations of Israel and the end times, and the telescandals.

If fundamentalist Christians look at the scriptural material as generally inerrant, many more liberal Christians have all too often thought that by proper analysis it is possible to acquire information about the so - called Jesus of history and then to speak with confidence about what he said and did and even about what he believed about himself and his vocation.

Just as Christian fundamentalists seek to restore the secular West to its original form of Christendom, so Muslim fundamentalists are motivated by the goal of restoring the Islamic world to its pristine purity.

For the fundamentalist Christian, God has been replaced by the Bible.

These key founders along with others like Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, and more, were far from fundamentalist Christians at the time in their lives when they were writing the laws that we still live by today in this country, fred.

As a moderate Christian highly influenced in his adult life by Deism, I think Madison could step back and see how silly these fundamentalists were towards each other.

And it's got to sting to be called a fundamentalist by other Christians (like me) when you're just trying to do the right thing and do it in love.

Conservative Protestantism includes Southern Baptists, Adventists, evangelicals / fundamentalists, Nazarenes, members of the Churches of Christ, the Pentecostal Holiness churches, the Churches of God, and others, and we should raise the percentage some by also including Christian Reformed and Missouri Synod Lutherans.

According to Giberson and Stephens, you might be an anti-intellectual fundamentalist if you are an evangelical who: dismisses evolution as «an unproven theory»; deny that «climate change is real and caused by humans»; think that «the founders were evangelicals who intended America to be a Christian nation»; defend spanking children; believe in traditional roles for the sexes; think that reparative therapy can «cure» homosexuality; and / or oppose gay marriage.

Curiously, it is being reasked by Christian clergymen at a time when so many others are unhesitatingly becoming part of the Jesus movement or returning to fundamentalist churches.

Presently, Episcopal Church leadership seems to be responding to this question by trying to incorporate elements of fundamentalism and evangelical expression, and to embrace charismatics and fundamentalists who have never had currency in Anglicanism [The Christian Century.

One of the significant obstacles to Christian evangelisation in the 21st century is the widely held notion in the West, both by fundamentalist [1] Christians and by non-Christians, that there is an inherent conflict between science and religion.