Sentences with phrase «by general court»

[A proposed Article of Amendment enabling Women to vote, adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1914 and 1915, was rejected by the people on the second day of November, 1915.]

The eighty - fourth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1961 and 1963, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 3d day of November, 1964.

The forty - third and forty - fourth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1914 and 1915, and were approved and ratified by the people on the 2d day of November, 1915.

The forty - second Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1912 and 1913, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 4th day of November, 1913, and was annulled by the forty - eighth Article.

The seventieth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1924 and 1925, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 2d day of November, 1926.

The ninetieth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1965 and 1967; the ninety - first Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1966 and 1967; and both Articles were approved and ratified by the people on the 5th day of November, 1968.

[A proposed Article of Amendment permitting the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions to extend aid to non-public schools students within the limits of the United States Constitution, adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1980 and 1982, was rejected by the people on the second day of November, 1982; and a similar Article of Amendment adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1984 and 1986, was rejected by the people on the fourth day of November, 1986.]

The seventy - seventh Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1945 and 1947, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 2d day of November, 1948.

The thirty - sixth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1893 and 1894, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 6th day of November, 1894.

The thirtieth and thirty - first Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1889 and 1890, and were approved and ratified by the people on the 4th day of November, 1890.

The one hundred and eighth and one hundred and ninth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1976 and 1977, and were approved and ratified by the people on the seventh day of November, 1978.

The one hundred and tenth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1976 and 1978, and was approved and ratified by the people on the seventh day of November, 1978.

The ninety - fifth, ninety - sixth, ninety - seventh, ninety - eighth, ninety - ninth and one hundredth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1969 and 1971, and all six Articles were approved and ratified by the people on the seventh day of November, 1972.

The thirty - ninth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1910 and 1911, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 7th day of November, 1911.

[A proposed Article of Amendment relative to allowing the General Court to regulate the practice and public funding of abortions consistent with the United States Constitution, adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1984 and 1986, was rejected by the people on the fourth day of November, 1986.]

The one hundred and fourteenth and one hundred and fifteenth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1977 and 1980, and were approved and ratified by the people on the fourth day of November, 1980.

The twenty - fourth and twenty - fifth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1859 and 1860, and were approved and ratified by the people May 7th, 1860.

The one hundred and eleventh and one hundred and twelfth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1975 and 1977, and were approved and ratified by the people on the seventh day of November, 1978.

The twenty - sixth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1862 and 1863, and was approved and ratified by the people April 6th, 1863.

The twentieth, twenty - first and twenty - second Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1856 and 1857, and were approved and ratified by the people May 1st, 1857.

The sixty - seventh Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1920 and 1921, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 7th day of November, 1922.

The eighty - sixth, eighty - seventh, eighty - eighth and eighty - ninth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1963 and 1965, and were approved and ratified by the people on the 8th day of November, 1966.

The one hundred and first and one hundred and second Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions 1971 and 1973, and both Articles were approved and ratified by the people on the fifth day of November, 1974.

[A proposed Article of Amendment changing the procedure by which the Legislature declares a measure to be an emergency law, adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1977 and 1980, was rejected by the people on the fourth day of November, 1980.]

The seventy - eighth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1946 and 1947, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 2d day of November, 1948.

The eighty - third Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1962 and 1963, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 3d day of November, 1964.

[A proposed Article of Amendment authorizing the General Court to impose and levy a graduated income tax and to base such tax upon the federal income tax, adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1969 and 1971, was rejected by the people on the seventh day of November, 1972.]

The seventy - first Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1928 and 1930, and was approved and ratified by the people on the 4th day of November, 1930.

The one hundred and sixth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1973 and 1975, and was approved and ratified by the people on the second day of November, 1976.

The fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth Articles of Amendment were adopted by the General Court during the sessions of the years 1854 and 1855, and were approved and ratified by the people May 23d, 1855.

The one hundred and fourth Article of Amendment was adopted by the General Court during the sessions of 1972 and 1974, and was approved and ratified by the people on the fifth day of November, 1974.

The ninety - second Article of Amendment was approved by the General Court during the sessions of 1968 and 1969; the ninety - third and ninety - fourth Articles of Amendment were approved by the General Court during the sessions of 1967 and 1969; and all three Articles were approved and ratified by the people on the 3d day of November, 1970.

The dispute was heard by the General Court before going to the ECJ, where it was held that Bank Mellat was not a state - owned bank — the Council had not been able to accurately verify the extent to which the state had any shareholding in the bank, nor was it the case that the bank was supporting nuclear proliferation.

Plus, from C - 50 / 12 does not result that there is an appeal to the Court of Justice, after the case is decided by the General Court.

Although the test had previously been accepted by the General Court in Gencor v Commission (T ‑ 102 / 96, EU: T: 1999:65) at § 92, this is the first time it has been recognised by the CJEU.

Article 12 makes triable by general court martial «any other person who, by the law of war, is [triable] by military tribunals.»

Another interesting aspect of the judgment by the General Court is the dismissal of the need for article 207 TFEU as an additional legal basis.

1700: An Act for the better Observation and Keeping the Lords Day, Acts and Laws Passed by the General Court of His Majesties Province of New - Hampshire in New - England, 1726 (reprinted 1886) 7.

This explanation by the General Court does very little to actually bring light to the Court's gnomic case law.

An update one year later: there is now an AG opinion in the Inuit case (Case C - 583 / 11 P), and there is a new case by the General Court (Case T - 381 / 11 Eurofer v Commission).

The outcome of the appeal is clear: the judgment by the General Court is set aside and the case is referred back to the General Court so that it can rule on the pleas that were not dealt with in the l judgment in first instance.

The annulment of the latter two years later by the General Court did not take immediate effect either, thanks to the appeals lodged by the Council, Commission and UK (Article 60 (2) CJEU Statute).

[1] Self - evidently, the best solution is not looking at the remedy as such, but at structural solutions for the workload faced by the General Court.

In a nutshell: the relevant jurisprudence concerning the applicable standard of review of intelligence sources and analysis was developed by the General Court in a series of judgments concerning the freezing of assets of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran («PMOI») in connection with the EU's fight against terrorism.

The Commission re-adopted its previous decision to impose fines on air cargo carriers, after its decision had been annulled by the General Court of the EU.

Thirdly, the Advocate General argues that the interpretation given by the General Court is in line with the drafting history of the Treaty of Lisbon.

In this Opinion the Advocate General endorses the approach taken by the General Court on the notion of «regulatory act» introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon.

The approach followed by the Commission, according to which the private investor test could not be applied to the conversion into capital of a tax claim, since a private investor could never hold a tax claim against an undertaking, was rejected by the General Court in first instance.

This reasoning was, however, invalidated by the General Court in its Aéroports de Paris judgment of 12 December 2000 (T - 128 / 98, confirmed on appeal by the Court in case C - 82 / 01 P), which clarified that the operation of an airport constitutes an economic activity, although the case concerned Article 102 TFEU and rules on predatory pricing.

In a case decided yesterday by the General Court this tension between secrecy needed for the effective conduct of negotiations and the right of citizens to be informed was readily apparent in determining whether the Commission was acting lawfully in its decision to refuse access to documents related to those negotiations to European Member of Parliament Sophie in «t Veld.