«Since Day 1 of this I have been calling it a non-event, a manufactured controversy
by global warming denialists trying to make enough noise to drown out any real talk on this topic.»
Climate scientist Michael Mann is under constant attack
by global warming denialists in the government.
Should this be the case, they could be deemed to be more of a threat to my grandchild than that represented
by global warming denialists (many of whom are pro nuclear and concerned about peak oil and population overshoot).
It is amazing to see how this paper is already being «spun»
by the global warming denialist blogosphere.
Not exact matches
It was even demonstrated in a paper
by prominent
global -
warming denialists (who correctly estimated the lag, but the rest of their thesis was rebutted here).
In fact, I was
by default not doubting the
global warming classic interpretation till I started reading multiple sources on the net, and as my self - confession as a recent skeptic shows, the argument from the
denialist camp are not only convincing to petrol gulping rednecks, but also to a very scientifically minded, atheist european (although, I must admit, I like motor sports; — RRB --RRB-.
Could anything be more out of date, backward - looking, or antiquated in spirit than the Carlin report's repackaging of yesterday's
denialist illusions and pseudoscientific nonsense about climate — fantasies that have been shot down time and again, that don't have a melting Greenland glacier's chance in a
warming climate when exposed to the light of reason, yet which have been presented to the world as if they were a brilliant refutation of the CO2 -
global warming link
by the sharpest analytical minds in the field of climatological research?
I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked
denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted
by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic
global warming is quickly drowned out
by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.
However, as long as we don't mind disregarding physical reality, it's easy to pretend
global warming just boils down to these El Niño step changes
by playing the
denialists» favorite game - curve fitting.
Presumably, that is not aimed at Martin Durkin, producer of The Great
Global Warming Swindle, and the man falsely accused
by Bob May, former president of the Royal Society, of being an HIV - AIDS
denialist.
The
Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is a United Kingdom think tank founded
by climate change
denialist Nigel Lawson with the purpose of combating what the foundation describes as «extremely damaging and harmful policies» designed to mitigate climate change.
The investigative blogger Deep Climate has been working to set the record straight on how an orchestrated campaign
by members of Congress, industry - funded
global warming denialist groups and PR operatives, and professional «skeptics» has spread misleading information about the paleoclimate... Continue reading →
The explanation for this, though, rests on an understanding of wider political and economic interests — could it be, perhaps, that this is the result of the billions of pounds pumped into the economy
by professional
denialist foundations such as Nigel Lawson's
Global Warming Policy Foundation and the legions of right wing Tory backers (not to mention the combined, and substantial efforts, of the global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream
Global Warming Policy Foundation and the legions of right wing Tory backers (not to mention the combined, and substantial efforts, of the
global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream
global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream media?
With the IPCC increasingly in the spotlight, the
denialists can trivialize the entire environmental crisis simply
by casting doubt on the scientific consensus on
global warming.
the billions of pounds pumped into the economy
by professional
denialist foundations such as Nigel Lawson's
Global Warming Policy Foundation
University of Virginia After a November 1 hearing, a Virginia judge has granted a petition from the University of Virginia to alter an earlier, inappropriate agreement
by university lawyers that would have allowed the radical right - wing,
global warming denialist American Tradition... Continue reading →
Most of the glibertarians, cultural conservatives, and gadget - heads who constitute the useful idiots around the core oil - and - coal - company
global -
warming denialist constituency would be horrified to imagine themselves playing the role of 9/11 Truthers, or RFK Jr. pumping the thimerosal / autism link, or Thabo Mbeki claiming that AIDS isn't caused
by HIV.
This, of course, is why the
denialist community harps on «CAGW» — catastrophic anthropogenic
global warming — despite the fact that this is not a scientific term (i.e. commonly used
by scientists).
Consider some of the arguments that are proposed and promoted
by well - qualified scientists in the
denialist camp:
Global warming stopped in 1998.
What I am talking about is, that it seems to me that with regard to climate science, this blog spends far too much time responding to the phony, trumped - up «debate» fueled
by denialist drivel, and not enough time addressing the legitimate scientific question as to whether it is in fact too late to prevent
global warming and climate change that will be catastrophic to human civilization, not to mention the entire Earth's biosphere.