Sentences with phrase «by global warming deniers»

I have been assailed in recent months by a range of superficially plausible arguments by Global Warming Deniers, whose views on other issues I largely respect.

The claim of a pause is noise made by global warming deniers who are misinforming themselves and others.

- Hurricane Sandy wasn't influenced by global warming deniers!»

My talk, on Wednesday, was about the subject of my new book, Fool Me Twice: fighting the assault on science in America, and ways NASA scientists, particularly NASA climate scientists, can communicate complex science in the face of antiscience attacks, such as those by global warming deniers.

It is no surprise that it comes up because it is one of the most popular claims made by the global warming deniers.

FYI, this paper is already being widely cited on blogs by global warming deniers as proof that all of the climate models are wrong, wrong, wrong and that the whole concept of anthropogenic GHG - caused warming has been refuted.

Perhaps sparked by global warming denier Jim Inhofe's recent appearance on the Rachel Maddow Show, Baldwin launched a series of tweets attacking Inhofe: -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

Trump, by contrast, appears to have no engagement with science, has implicitly denied the scientific consensus when it comes to global warming, and he wasn't supported by the tech industry during the election (the highly ideological, libertarian Thiel notwithstanding).

The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks as the greenest community in Canada by such pundits as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the climate - change - denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global warming science is «not settled.»

Denying global warming is one prime example held by extremists who seem to lean toward the religious right with respect to political ideology.

For instance when Clinton accused Trump of saying that the concept of global warming was created by China to relegate US manufacturing Trump denied ever saying that's.

Points 2 and 3 might lead to their not believing in global warming, but when faced by such an overwhelming majority of scientist who believe it, it seems (to me) almost like a conspiracy theory to deny it.

Conservatives are, on the whole, more aligned with business and / or industry Since industry is most likely to be adversely affected by the consequences of regulations to reduce global warming (emissions restrictions, for example) there is an incentive to deny global warming.

Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as alarmist.

Environmental groups have been frustrated by the Bush administrations rejection of the Kyoto treaty and what Sohn describes as its tendency to deny, deflect blame and delay when it comes to issues involving global warming.

For years, we at Greenpeace have been working to make public the secret paper trails that show what everyone already knows: climate science deniers - #Fakexperts - are few and far between, and most of them are paid by companies most responsible for global warming to downplay the problem.

Global warming deniers * pull similar dirty tricks with the comparison of global temperature with model projections — for example, by plotting only the tropical mid-troposphere, and by comparing observations with the projections of scenarios which are furthest from reGlobal warming deniers * pull similar dirty tricks with the comparison of global temperature with model projections — for example, by plotting only the tropical mid-troposphere, and by comparing observations with the projections of scenarios which are furthest from reglobal temperature with model projections — for example, by plotting only the tropical mid-troposphere, and by comparing observations with the projections of scenarios which are furthest from reality.

For those who seek to curtail travel in a feeble attempt to fight global warming: Given the non-emergency that climate change has thus far proven to be and the real and dire crises that presently plague the planet, should we also deny transportation (by aid organizations and concerned citizens) to regions, like the Darfur or Sierra Leone, that require our immediate attention?

I've been fascinated by how, as the global warming debate went on, the deniers all suddenly began to attack windmills.

His indifference to the harm done to the public mind by the AGW deniers is perhaps why so many skeptics find comfort in Pielke's message, and why so many casual observers mistake him for a global warming skeptic.

Getting sidetracked about discussions concerning how far they can swim is just sick obfuscation being propagated by deniers who want to discredit any global warming science.

As usual with any Post article that discusses global warming and climate change, the comments are already dominated by sneering, arrogant deniers who ignore the actual content of the article and launch into their scripted, robotic, idiotic diatribes.

This is contributing to all of us going down the tubes together as a result of global warming skeptics and deniers who are playing around with the well known casino rule of «gambler's ruin» by always betting against the house.

Global warming deniers however, as you have said, are obsessed by water vapour and good information is needed to show them how they are fooling themselves.

I have no doubt that your blog entry will be followed by the usual responses: those who deny the existence of global warming, those who deny the link between greenhouse gases and global warming, those who insist there still isn't enough evidence, and those who can not see beyond the rising prices of gasoline and heating oil.

I wonder those people deny the global warming whether see the one by one phenomenon, whether they worry about these phenomena?

Since this blog has given considerable space to the discussions of the global warming deniers (who have no real basis in serious academic literature), it would only seem fair to review this book by Speth in the NY Times, and then have a discussion of it on this blog.

Below is a note sent to me by Vic Svec, who you heard from here earlier in the year in relation to efforts by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, a rising star in the Democratic Party, to deny permits for two proposed coal - burning power plants because of their potential contribution to global warming.

Stratospheric cooling accompanied by surface warming is actually PREDICTED by GHG model yet GW deniers present the stratospheric cooling part as «proof» that global warming was NOT happening!!

When I read Dot Earth, I get irritated by those who deny the realities of global warming or peak oil or overpopulation; who are unwilling to change in thinking or in attitude or in lifestyle.

Evidence for global warming over the last 150 years or so is so widespread that it can be denied only by those either unwilling to look or pushing an agenda in denial of observable facts.

The letter portends to offer facts about «climate change deniers, but readers can't even get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point about skeptic climate scientists saying global warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and caused by humans, but it's not so bad.»

a Greenpeace research project highlighting the more than a decade - long campaign by Exxon - funded front groups — and the scientists they work with — to deny the urgency of the scientific consensus on global warming and delay action to fix the problem.

«Pete Ridley is a global warming denier who argues that the «global warming hoax» is being perpetrated by the International Jewish Banking conspiracy led by the Rothschilds.»

Consider, for example, Bjorn Lomborg, who has never «denied» global warming, climate change, nor that they represent serious problems which ought to be addressed, probably by government intervention.

And if Skolnick is accurate in his claim that «Pete Ridley is a global warming denier who argues that the «global warming hoax» is being perpetrated by the International Jewish Banking conspiracy led by the Rothschilds», then you should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself... however politically charged this issue, such anti-Semite views are disgusting.

My concern on this issue is two-fold: one consists of the actual global consequences of the reality of global warming, and the other is the blatant manipulation of that reality by those who would deny it.

To start, Rep. Lamar Smith (R - Texas), who is a global warming denier, by the way, is the head of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Daniel Cressey; cross-posted from The Great Beyond Over 250 members of the US National Academy of Sciences have hit back at global warming deniers, warning that attacks on climate science are being mainly driven not by intellectual inquiry but by special interest and dogma.

Warmists project their climate change denial very nicely and obviously on skeptics, by calling them climate change (or global warming) deniers.

Global warming is a movement that has been taken over by the liberal wing of the Democrat Party in America with its collectivist creed: deny the existence of personal responsibility and employ any means to bring about the Left's imaginary Utopian ends.

We don't get any closer to science by denying the significant possibility that we are causing significantly adverse changes in climate than we do by the ridiculous assertion that we understand the chaotic complexity of climate well enough to say with certainty how many parts per millions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to how many degrees of global warming.

You further presume that it is essential to «mitigate» climate change which by default castigates as «denier» all who accept your anthropogenic majority global warming, yet who find the economics of «mitigation» incredibly bad and the concept morally reprehensible.

That study refuted gospel by deniers that global warming slowed between 1998 and 2012.

Of course several denizens on this board have denied CO2 is a greenhouse gas (by denying the greenhouse effect) and have denied that Earth has warmed (by claiming global temperature is meaningless concept) and denied that rising CO2 has a warming effect.

In his big speech on climate change today, President Obama mocked Republicans who deny the existence of man - made global warming by derisively referring to them as members of «the Flat Earth Society.»

'' In addition to critiques by well - known global warming deniers, the issue of hurricanes and global warming has been debated intensely within the meteorological community, identifying clear differences in the prevailing views on this subject...............»

At the Northeast Public Power Association's annual conference in Lake Placid, N.Y. last month, what was billed as a «common sense» discussion on climate change was actually a talk by Steve Goreham, an author of books that deny that burning fossil fuels causes global warming.

By your use of this term, you directly imply that I am a «denier», as I am highly skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (not just «anthropogenic global warming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experimentBy your use of this term, you directly imply that I am a «denier», as I am highly skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (not just «anthropogenic global warming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experiGlobal Warming (not just «anthropogenic global warming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experWarming (not just «anthropogenic global warming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experiglobal warming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experwarming», which is plausible if not measurable, although there are honest grounds to doubt even this associated with the details of the Carbon Cycle that remain unresolved by model or experimentby model or experiment).

Virginia Attorney General and global warming denier Ken Cuccinelli has been rebuffed by a state Circuit Court judge who ruled today that Cuccinelli's politically - charged subpoena against the University of Virginia and climate scientist Michael Mann lacked an «objective basis.»