Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required
by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»
Not exact matches
In fact, some have already capitulated, conveniently blaming the central banks for rendering their
religious beliefs useless, possibly just
as these turncoats» own business began to be impacted
by their unfortunate asset mix of the past 5 years.
It is a thinly disguised attempt
by the Evangelical Christian movement to present their
religious beliefs as such.
are not just exhibited
by people of «
religious beliefs,» but
by others
as well.
as with every other argument about christianity, if it really was only a
belief it would be of no consequence, but unfortunately so many use their
religious beliefs as an excuse to attempt to demand the rest of the population adhere to their
beliefs by codifying them into civil law.
You believe that life doesn't continue, and you should be left alone
by the
religious as well,
as that
belief is your choice.
Everytime
religious people post something about God or something out of their
belief, there comes the Atheists storming it with their typical (hateful, profane, disrespectful but in - fairness articulate, itellect, scientific and logical) replies and name callings such
as; «2000 years
religious numbnuts», «oxymorons who keep asking of sky daddy's help», «idiots who was fooled
by a magical being in the sky» and so on and so forth.
This is not surprising in itself, of course; what Roof and McKinney regard
as significant is the fact that
religious communities are increasingly distinguished not
by theological
beliefs but
by «contrasting ethical styles and moral views.»
On August 31, 2007, the president of Clemson University opened a letter from the South Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union that read, «Coach [Tommy] Bowden... has abused his authority
as... head football coach
by imposing his strong personal
religious beliefs upon....
CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy
by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and abortion
as part of preventative care regardless of
religious beliefs.
As Mary Eberstadt reports, expressions of
religious belief that society considered innocuous and normal until quite recently are now grounds for dismissal from jobs, denial of employment, and boycotts
by the media.
«The prevalence of faith schools demonstrates that schools are regarded
by many
as places where it is legitimate to seek to encourage adherence to a particular
religious belief.
Washington (CNN)- Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy
by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and abortion
as part of preventative care regardless of
religious beliefs.
This understanding can be used
by outsiders
as a way of removing the
beliefs of
religious communities from serious consideration
as to their truth.
«Even though starting a government meeting with a
religious prayer is offensive to many, considered a violation of our const.itution
by many, makes many feel ostracized and
as if their voice will not be given equal consideration to those who are religions, I think we should still start of government meetings with prayers because this is a country that believes in the free expression of ones
beliefs and opinions without fear of percecution.»
Our definition of religion and
religious belief departs from the traditional one in which Marxism, naturalism, scientism and positivism are classified
as ideologies, not
as religion, the implication being that they are formulated and attained
by pure reason alone.
And finally, an important observation is furnished
by Bronislaw Malinowski, who describes the transition from ordinary human experience to
religious experience and
belief as a «breaking point» to which the human organism reacts in spontaneous outbursts, and in which rudimentary modes of behavior and rudimentary
beliefs are engendered.15
But to preclude the imposition of a priori evolutionary categories on the nature of
religious belief, let us accept the definition of religion
as given
by the historians and sociologists of religion.
Therefore the Prophet (may God bless him) has said, «Islam is put upon five principles:
belief In the single God and in Muhammad
as His Messenger, performance of prayers, payment of
religious tax, keeping of the month of Ramadan, and pilgrimage to the Holy Mosque
by whoever finds the way clear to do it.»
By restricting the activities of foreign organizations and what are seen
as non-Russian forms of
religious belief, the Russian government has consolidated its
religious support and made an intentional (and enforceable) display of Russian cultural unity in the face of the external pressures of consumerism, individualism, and secularism.
Religious beliefs and practices are observed and discussed, but treated
as states of mind and social customs, mere human constructions unsupported
by any transcendent reality.
Not all pastors and other
religious leaders automatically define sin
by specific definition
as a disease, and it doesn't actually fit my
belief as to what sin is, which is an act to knowingly and willfully disobey a commandment from God.
your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas
as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of
religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated
by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.
thinks, that the Tigris and the Euphrates have not a common source, that the Dead Sea had been in existence long before human beings came to live in Palestine, instead of originating in historical times, and so on... We are able to comprehend this
as the naive conception of the men of old, but we can not regard
belief in the literal truth of such accounts
as an essential of
religious conviction... And every one who perceives the peculiar poetic charm of these old legends must feel irritated
by the barbarian — for there are pious barbarians — who thinks he is putting the true value upon these narratives only when he treats them
as prose and history.
Some people, for instance, regard
religious beliefs as propositional truths revealed
by God and merely received
by humans.
They are made to act — and should want to act —
as agents of the public fisc who can not rightfully use the tax funds paid under duress of law
by all the people — of many faiths and no faith — for the imposition of the
religious beliefs or for the institutional advantage or aggrandizement of the sponsoring church.
Being
as these candidates continually bring religion into the campaign
by stressing how
religious they are I would hope that the moderators of the this debate will actually question them on the actual tenets of their
beliefs.
As if violating the first amendment
by forcing employers to pay for things that violate their
religious beliefs isn't bullying.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and
belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain
by reacting and not
by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non
religious such
as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such
as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person
by nature), the
religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR
beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same
as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.
The statistical reality, so far
as I can tell, is that Judaism in the contemporary world is far more threatened
by a simple lack of interest
by Jews in Judaism, and hence an inability to pass on (
as a
religious faith)
beliefs that are not broadly held.
In days past, we could regard these persons and
beliefs as «esoterica,» suitable objects of scholarship
by odd professors but otherwise of not much concern to our own
religious life.
Toward my
belief system, religion is a personal
belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's
beliefs upon
religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered
by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where
religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated from
religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations
as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...
Still less do they mean that men could be «cured» of their
religious beliefs by proving them false,
as men might possibly be cured of drug addiction
by lectures about the injury it does to them.
Although at first this argument was used to support a conservative form of Catholicism,
as time passed it could also be used to derive norms
by which
religious beliefs could be judged.
In sum, because it treats
belief as an atomistic decision taken piecemeal
by individuals rather than a holistic response to family life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to present an incomplete version of how some considerable portion of human beings actually come to think and behave about things
religious — not one
by one and all on their own, but rather mediated through the elemental connections of husband, wife, child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
Toward my
belief system, religion is a personal
belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's
beliefs upon
religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered
by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where
religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated from
religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations
as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...
Anyone holding to a different view or
belief (especially
religious) is ridiculed
as possessing a sub-standard intellect
by the Atheistic - run world status quo.
And though Stalin executed priests and other clergy that he perceived
as a threat to his power, later when he, like many political leaders, saw benefit to be gained
by using
religious beliefs to enhance his own power, he made an alliance with the Russian Orthodox Church, just
as Putin has done today.
This learning process goes in the other direction
as well: I am likely to learn a great deal about the inner logic and systematic connections among my own
religious beliefs by subjecting them to a polemical engagement, things, again, that I could learn in no other way.
On August 31, 2007, the president of Clemson University opened a letter from the South Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union that read, «Coach [Tommy] Bowden... has abused his authority
as... head football coach
by imposing his strong personal
religious beliefs upon student - athletes under his charge.»
These suggest a vision which revealed Jesus in his heavenly glory at the right hand of the divine throne, not unlike that seen
by the martyr Stephen when he looked up to heaven and «saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God's right hand».47 So Goguel comments, «When we consider the part played
by the faith in the resurrection in Paul's
religious life and thought
as a result of Christ's appearance to him, we see that most essential to his faith was not the feeling that Jesus had returned to the environment of his life on earth preceding his passion but a
belief in his glorification, i.e. in his transition to life in heaven where death has no more dominion over him.»
As for Pastor Mike and his atheist registry, like so many other strongly religious people I've encountered, he's equating religion with morality, as if, without religious belief (the right religious belief), you are incapable of possessing and living by a moral / ethical cod
As for Pastor Mike and his atheist registry, like so many other strongly
religious people I've encountered, he's equating religion with morality,
as if, without religious belief (the right religious belief), you are incapable of possessing and living by a moral / ethical cod
as if, without
religious belief (the right
religious belief), you are incapable of possessing and living
by a moral / ethical code.
Jews were getting «beat up»
by stronger powers in the region, like other peoples, but not because of their
religious beliefs or specifically targeted
as an ethnic group until Christianity came to identify them
as the killers of their savior.
Most of these lectures aim at bringing the insights of Hinduism and Buddhism closer to Indian and Western Christians
as well
as philosophers, to deepen their understanding of faith and expand it to other forms of
belief.43 His anthology «The Vedic Experience» which has been accepted and respected
by many Hindus, tries to present texts from the Veda and the Upanishads in such a way that they become open towards other
beliefs and transparent for the depth of faith.44 An important aspect of his literary production, already central at the beginning, but gaining prominence again lately, has been to address a Western public that faces the challenge of having to seek its
religious identity and not being able to take it for granted.
Any attempt at applying «logic» to explain the bible
by people who are believers and still think of themselves
as rather intelligent (self - delusion is a symptom / cause of
religious belief) always ends up in ridiculous arguments...
Any place of business is required
by law (at least here in GA) to accomodate any
religious belief in so far
as it does not impose an «undo hardship» upon the business.
When I became a lawyer I swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States, which now,
as interpreted
by the Court, contains newly discovered rights that, if accepted, would destroy my moral and
religious beliefs and therefore my conscience.
One was the work of a sociologist, Earl Brewer, who, with the aid of a theologian and a ministries specialist, sought
by an extensive content analysis of sermons and other addresses given in a rural and an urban church to differentiate the patterns of
belief and value constituting those two parishes.67 The second was the inquiry of a
religious educator, C. Ellis Nelson, who departed from a curricular definition of education to envision the congregation
as a «primary society» whose integral culture conditions its young and old members.68 James Dittes, the third author, described more fully the nature of the culture encountered in the local church.
Science
by all means can comment and deny it because there's no proof but religion (and
by extension,
religious people) take this
as an assault on them and their
beliefs and so fight back.