It's important to note that jumbo loans are accompanied
by higher interest rates as compared to «conforming» loans (those at or below $ 417,000).
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build
rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build
rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals
as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such
as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment
by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders
by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount
rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such
as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such
as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such
as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit
ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers,
as well
as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending
by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of
interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to
higher interest payments should
interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any
interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco
as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange
rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Stocks are falling
as traders worry about rising
interest rates, and volatility
as measured
by the VIX has jumped to its
highest since the market turmoil of August 2015.
Treasuries extended declines from October, pushing 10 - year yields to a five - week
high,
as the probability of a Federal Reserve
interest -
rate increase
by year - end hovered near 50 percent.
Achievement of these goals was considered
by the HRC
as very challenging, even aggressive, given the expected modest economic growth for 2007 for the financial services industry, the impact and duration of the on - going flat / inverted yield curve (meaning short - term
interest rates that are virtually equal to or exceed long - term
interest rates, thus lowering profit margins for financial services companies that borrow cash at short - term
rates and lend at long - term
rates), potentially
higher credit losses, fewer available
high - quality,
high - yielding loans and investment opportunities, and a consumer shift from non-
interest to
interest - bearing deposits.
That said,
as longer terms tend to go hand - in - hand with
higher rates, those planning to repay their student loans faster may lose money to
interest payments
by selecting a 15 - year term.
That will be important to private investors, because if the central bank held itself out
as a privileged bondholder, effectively passing more risk on to other bond holders, other buyers might undermine the stimulus program
by demanding
higher interest rates.
Recently, there has been some discussion, prompted
by senior staff at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), that central banks might aim for
high inflation — say 4 per cent —
as a way of giving them more scope to reduce official
interest rates in future downturns.
For Canadian bonds, we expect a similar wavelike pattern
as for U.S. Treasuries, but with a
higher frequency, driven
by factors that will alternate between local macro considerations and the pull from how U.S.
interest rates evolve.
In the late 1970s, probably first
as a consequence of the
highest real
interest rates in U.S. history, engineered
by Paul Volcker's Federal Reserve Bank, the United States began a process of income concentration that has continued until now for reasons that are hotly debated.
While more modest in comparison to these movements, the recent new lows reached
by gold reflect a renewed expectation for
higher real
interest rates as the Fed starts to raise
rates.
Arbitrageurs made billions
by acting
as financial intermediaries making income on the margin between low yen - borrowing costs and
high foreign - currency
interest rates.
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with
high -
interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk of adverse actions
by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided
by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed
higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x)
as a result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
«Whereas companies routinely reward their shareholders with
higher dividends, no company in the history of finance, going back
as far
as the Medicis, has rewarded its bondholders
by raising the
interest rate on a bond.»
This reflects borrowers switching from loan products with
higher interest rates, such
as traditional fixed - term personal loans, to products which attract lower
rates of
interest, such
as home - equity lines of credit and other borrowing secured
by residential property.
Banks are sitting on such vast quantities of excess reserves — paid to do so
by the Federal Reserve
as it pays a relative
high interest rate on reserves — that the monetary base is larger than M1.
With
interest rates on low - risk investments falling to low levels in many countries, investors have sought to maintain yields
by moving into
higher - risk assets such
as corporate debt and emerging market debt.
Not that much
higher because they're still secured
by a home (the home
as collateral), the
interest rates people typically pay on them are lower than those of nearly any other sort of borrowing.
As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weaknes
As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already
high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at
higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising
interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence
as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weaknes
as measured
by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst,
as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weaknes
as measured
by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.
Officials also expect
interest rates to tread
higher with at least two increases in 2019 and 2020 correspondingly, bringing the federal funds
rate to 3.375 percent effectively,
higher than the 3 - percent equilibrium
rate,
as indicated
by the dots.
Longer ‐ term bonds carry a longer or
higher duration than shorter ‐ term bonds;
as such, they would be affected
by changing
interest rates for a greater period of time if
interest rates were to increase.
As noted above, growth in housing lending at fixed
rates has picked up appreciably in recent months, reflecting the anticipation
by borrowers of
higher variable
interest rates.
In 1845, the Bank of England tightened its monetary policy
by raising
interest rates, which has a tendency to pop economic bubbles
as capital is no longer
as cheap
as it once was and now
higher - yielding bonds become more attractive to investors again.
This led to
higher bond yields and another weak close for US equities
as business and consumer activity could be dampened
by higher interest rates.
NEW YORK (AP)-- U.S. stocks wavered Thursday and finished barely
higher as an
interest rate cut
by the Bank of England, a move intended to shore up the British economy, wasn't enough to get investors out of their cautious mode.
The pull back in prices since January relates to
higher interest rates as inflation is now running ahead of the 2 % target set
by the Fed.
As you can see, the one percentage point increase in
interest rates results in a loss for Year 1, but
by Year 2 the cumulative return turns positive because
interest and principal reinvest at
higher rates.
It will come
as both relief and encouragement to the millions of people either directly affected
by payday lending or simply angry at the way these businesses have been able to prey on the vulnerable through staggeringly
high interest rates and penalty charges.
The film
rates this
high for me not just because of its technical skill (the ensemble acting is terrific, with Kelly Macdonald in particular doing great work in just a few scenes, and Roger Deakins's cinematography is
as good
as anything he's done with the Coens, and that's saying a lot) but because of its ambiguity: because the questions it raises about narrative and about society are
as interesting as those raised
by any other film (but one) of 2007.
That means focusing on the lower - hanging fruit in terms of cutting costs - such
as cutting
interest rates, which are currently up to 6.1 %, and have been attacked
as bafflingly
high by a long line of former Conservative and Labour education ministers.
The insurance premiums are normally paid
by your bank and then baked into your monthly mortgage payment, effectively making your total
interest rate higher; and the more you borrow, the more you'll pay
as insurance.
For younger students, who do not have sufficient credit history, monthly payments on private student loans could be hardly bearable,
as the
interest rate set
by lenders is typically very
high to offset potential risk of default.
By adding points, they can offer a lower
interest rate and make approximately
as much money
as they would at the
higher rate.
But instead of being daunted
by the
high interest rates, I think of paying off debt
as a guaranteed investment — both literally and for my financial future.
In 1994 to early 1995, that illusion was destroyed
as the bond market was dragged to
higher yields
by the Fed plus mortgage bond managers who tried to limit their
interest rate risks individually, leading to a more general crisis.
Because personal loans are usually unsecured, they're perceived
by lenders
as riskier, so
higher interest rates may apply.
MYGAs are issued
by insurance companies instead of banks and typically offer
higher guaranteed
interest rates,
as well
as the ability to be converted into a lifelong stream of income.
Check cashing companies and certain finance companies along with some others are offering short - term loans at a
high interest rate that are referred
by various names such
as cash advance loans, payday loans, check advance loans, deferred deposit check loans or post-dated check loans.
The scheduled increase in the PLUS Loan
interest rate was subsequently changed from 7.9 % to 8.5 %
by the
Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005,
as passed on February 8, 2006.
While they make steps to minimize the risks
by verifying the ability of the borrower to repay the loan, they do grant loans to bad credit borrowers,
as they make most money from sub-prime lending portfolios, since bad credit personal loans have
higher interest rates and fees.
By today's standards, a good customer can simply be late paying a debt other than the credit card and find their
interest rates skyrocket, sometimes
as high as 30 %.
As interest rates move
higher, people naturally respond to the opportunity to earn
interest by reducing the amount of cash they carry, both directly and indirectly.
While some financial emergencies can be solved
by using a credit card, cards have been a source of financial problems because
as a source of existing easy credit they have often been used casually, at times irresponsibly, and ultimately led to people having significant unsecured debt incurring
high interest rates.
As for the borrower,
by providing collateral, he will be able to obtain a
higher loan amount with a lower
interest rate and a longer repayment program.
In the era prior to the CARD Act many issuers applied payments made
by cardholders to finance charges and balances with lower
interest rates which cause
higher interest accrual on the accounts and made it more difficult to pay down the total balances on their credit card accounts faster
as the portions of their debt with
higher interest rates were carried forward from month to month.
I would just like to say that,
as a person who has tried to «outsmart» debt
by moving it around, and then
by paying the
highest interest rate debt first, and failing miserably, I am now firmly aboard the Dave Ramsey plan.
As long as the after - tax interest rate on the mortgage is higher than the after - tax interest rate you are earning on your cash, then you save money by using the cash to pay down the mortgag
As long
as the after - tax interest rate on the mortgage is higher than the after - tax interest rate you are earning on your cash, then you save money by using the cash to pay down the mortgag
as the after - tax
interest rate on the mortgage is
higher than the after - tax
interest rate you are earning on your cash, then you save money
by using the cash to pay down the mortgage.
The two leading theories are the Debt Snowball,
as advocated
by Dave Ramsey, in which you pay the smallest debts first, and the Right Way,
as advocated
by rational people, in which you pay the
highest interest rate debts first.
The
higher tax
rates described above would affect any investment income treated
as ordinary income, such
as interest paid
by bonds or certificates of deposit.
Typically, you will have to pay
higher interest rates because of the
higher risks assumed
by the creditor although you need not present any personal and / or real property
as collateral.