You state exactly that which you know within an acceptable confidence interval that is the norm for that discipline, but not
by hindcasting, but by making predictions of key variables whose values were not determined in the past, to show the validity of your theory / model.
Those parameter sets are fine tuned
by hindcasting.
We use this CTL run as a surrogate «real» world and then evaluate the predictability
by hindcasting this model simulated climate variability.
More often, models have been tested
by hindcasting — they are forced with a known change starting at a past known climate state, and asked whether they can accurately project the output (e.g., a temperature change resulting from a change in CO2, solar forcing, etc.)?
(They are tested
by hindcasting — i.e. they must be able to accurately model changes which have already been observed to have occurred.)
This late - 1970s reversal in sea ice trends was not captured
by the hindcasts of the recent CMIP5 climate models used for the latest IPCC reports, which suggests that current climate models are still quite poor at modelling past sea ice trends.»
Not exact matches
Wang and his modeling team — fellow VIMS researchers Derek Loftis, Zhuo Liu, David Forrest, and Joseph Zhang — conducted their study
by «
hindcasting» Hurricane Sandy's landfall along the U.S. Atlantic coast.
Both
hindcasts and projections are strongly influenced
by climate sensitivity and also
by vertical ocean diffusivity.
Part of the uncertainty in the attribution is of course how realistic the «noise» in the models is — and that can be assessed
by looking at
hindcasts, paleo - climate etc..
Decadal
hindcast simulations of Arctic Ocean sea ice thickness made
by a modern dynamic - thermodynamic sea ice model and forced independently
by both the ERA - 40 and NCEP / NCAR reanalysis data sets are compared for the first time.
Ideas to make it better could be to follow RE 4's suggestion to have side -
by - side panels with the left one showing the original fig where data stops at the
hindcast / forecast line and the right one showing the full data set.
This can involve «perfect model» experiments (where you test to see whether you can predict the evolution of a model simulation given only what we know about the real world), or
hindcasts (as used
by K08), and only where there is demonstrated skill is there any point in making a prediction for the real world.
What was awful was their
hindcast in 2008 which missed actual temps
by a mile.
I am very sceptical when I look at figures like this where the
hindcast is off
by a whopping 0.2 degC for the decades centered on 1910 and 1945.
In either case, LES can also be driven
by weather
hindcasts, and the simulation results can be evaluated against the wealth of observations that are now available, observations both from space and from the ground.
It is the average long - wave cloud forcing error derived from comparing against observations, 20 years of
hindcasts made
by 26 CMIP5 models.
Testing the hypotheses must be accomplished
by using «
hindcast» simulations that attempt to reproduce past climate behavior over multidecadal time scales.
4) Climate models adopted
by IPCC do not work; they can not forecast or
hindcast climate temperature trends.
Do you understand that models which are sensitive to initial conditions can be made to match in
hindcast by modifying the initial conditions?
As for tone, I stand
by my assertion that the general claim that models are validated
by matching a test vector of 2 - 3 degrees of freedom in
hindcast is scientifically an absolute joke.
This skill must be assessed
by predicting global, regional and local average climate, and any climate change that was observed over the last several decades (i.e. «
hindcast model predictions»).
Accuracy must be tested
by comparing in
hindcast runs of the models their ability to:
If I can prove that solar activity is modulated
by the motion of the solar system masses and their associated fields, we will be able to accurately
hindcast solar activity and get a better idea of its correlation with climate changes.
The burden, of course, is for authors that present
hindcast multi-decadal climate projections, to provide quantitative documentation of the ability of their model to predict changes in the climate metrics that are requested
by the impact and policy communities.
Another, more interesting, reason is that it can help invalidate models (or give them at best some limited validity)
by letting them run for
hindcast of the actual situation.
By looking at the accuracy of the model's performance in matching
hindcasts they would be able to estimate within what margin of error the model was expected to be able to perform.
Notice for example, the great deviation in the
hindcast due to the 1991 Pinatubo eruption, which obviously couldn't be anticipated
by better initializations.
So the models
hindcast is low, say
by one bomb.
The sensitivity of the models is, as I think you are saying, constrained
by it's parametrizations, which are bounded
by observational data on TOA radiation data etc. (although not all very tightly constrained) but this is not what is being questioned about the models, rather the issue is whether the model
hindcasts matching historical temperatures to some degree is evidence that they have correct physics, or is merely a result of modelers making the choices for inputs which will produce a reasonable result.
Further are you talking about
hindcasting or forecasting
by these models?
Nothing I have done or studied or forecasted or
hindcasted the past 24 years has come true, and everything I have projected and extrapolated the past 24 years has been falsified
by real data, or proven to have come from bad programs, post-hoc edits, and exaggerated sources of no reasonable validity.
We find a close agreement between the CESM - based
hindcasts and the Markov model, indicating that the largest contribution to the predictive skill of soil water on interannual to decadal timescales in CESM can be attributed to the damped persistence, which is partly governed
by the evapotranspiration (Delworth and Manabe 1988), the total runoff, and the diffusion of soil moisture into the deeper soil levels as shown in the Eq.
The ability to
hindcast the detailed changes in atmospheric composition over the past decade, particularly the variability of tropospheric O3 and CO, is limited
by the availability of measurements and their integration with models and emissions data.
This stance may be reinforced
by his personal dislike of Michael Mann as well as false statements such as» [climate] models are barely able to
hindcast, let alone forecast».
Essentially, it's the average cloud forcing error made
by CMIP5 - level GCMs, when they were used to
hindcast 20 years of satellite observations of global cloud cover (1985 - 2005).
The potential to make skillful forecasts on these timescales, and the ability to do so, is investigated
by means of predictability studies and retrospective forecasts (termed
hindcasts) using climate models and statistical approaches.
So, inputting actual values of the cooling effect (such as the determination
by Penner et al.) would make every climate model provide a mismatch of the global warming it
hindcasts and the observed global warming for the twentieth century.
It's me needing a better understanding of
hindcasting, but I see that as taking a model that we point towards the future and use the results from the same model
by pointing it back in history (where we have observable evidence) and use the quality of
hindcasting results to support the presumed reliability for the forward projections.
Also, in preparation for our simulations, we made model
hindcasts for a range of climate sensitivities and forced
by the estimated total radiative forcing anomaly for the period AD 1765 — 2012 (Fig.
The 20th century is very successfully
hindcasted by all the major climate models.
There haven't yet been 15 years since 2001, but even
hindcasting to include the running 10 - 15 year trend lines between 1990 and today, one doesn't develop sufficient exceptions to the rising trend to declare a falling or level trend overall
by that standard.
The practice of
hindcasting remains unscientific because it circumvents deduction and, as has been widely discussed
by the great philosophers of our time (e.g. Popper), just because induction works in some cases does not prove that it works in all cases and does not make it an acceptable scientific method.
2) The
hindcast and forecast warmings simulated
by climate models do not agree with empiric observations.
On the other hand, to the extent that such reliability can be demonstrated (even in a
hindcast situation), it must be considered a positive indication in judging whether the range of uncertainty sampled
by an ensemble provides a plausible range of depictions of the climate system.
When compared to the Scharf / HAS / 7th grader model (i.e. a simple straight line with a slope defined
by the 1979 - 1988 trend), it beats it in predictive skill, and wallops it in
hindcasting, wherein the naive model with a slope of 0.5 C / 30 years predicts that in 1700 the temperature of the planet was 5C cooler than 2000, and in 1400 the temperature of the planet was 10C cooler, and yes, keep on going.
On the contrary, global warming is a problem for which the world is rather well equipped to make informed policy, thanks to the IPCC reviewing the best available scientific knowledge, and thanks to ensembles of
hindcasting - capable models constrained
by (real - world!)
I have difficulty believing there would be a model that shows over 20k temperature change
by 2041 - 2060 that has a good
hindcast goodness of fit unless there was some problem with the experiment design or an unstable computer calculating the forecast.
Restore Academic «skin in the game»
by funding on prediction accuracy curryja Proposal: Make grant funds were contingent on model forecast /
hindcast accuracy.
The mean bias as a function of lead time was computed from those DePreSys
hindcasts that were unaffected
by Mount Pinatubo (SOM text) and removed from the DePreSys forecast (but not the
hindcasts).