It is also important to note that once feeding
by humans is prohibited, hungry cats are forced to compete with wildlife over available, natural food sources.
Not exact matches
Companies must also abide
by rules that
prohibit deliveries at night and those that
are out of the eyesight of
human operators.
Make sure they
are consistent with recent regulations, such as the one passed in 2016
by U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, which generally
prohibit discrimination in healthcare offerings related to gender transition.
gree to conduct only research that
is not
prohibited by Federal law, regulations, or policies of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) or National Institutes of Health (NIH)
What do the following authors all have in common — Jean Paul Sartre, Voltaire, Denis Diderot, Victor Hugo, Jean - Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, René Descartes, Francis Bacon, John Milton, John Locke, and Blaise Pascal: (a) They
are among the most gifted writers the World has known; (b) They concentrated on opposing dogma and opening the
human mind and spirit to the wonders of free thought and intellectual freedom; (c) They
were intimidated
by the Catholic Church and put on the Church's list of
prohibited authors; or (d) All of the above.
The reasons that kangaroo meat
was prohibited for
human consumption for such a long time
are not straightforward but an important element
was a fear
by producers of traditional red meats that kangaroo would become a significant competitor for beef and lamb.
Companies would
be prohibited by the USDA and FDA to use substances that could
be harmful in
human consumption.
«In a case involving the Republic of Niger, the ECOWAS Court of Justice stated that «slavery
is considered as a serious violation of
human dignity and
is formally
prohibited by all international
human rights instruments.
Although manipulation of the
human germline
is prohibited by law in many countries, including Germany, a global ban
is not in effect.
Lamberth granted a preliminary injunction on this research after hearing a petition from a group of advocates who argued that, contrary to the U.S. government's view, research on embryonic stem cells does in fact destroy embryos — action that
is prohibited by legislation known as the «Dickey - Wicker Amendment» to the bill that funds the Department of Health and
Human Services.
But in previous ripostes to the book's critics, most notably in a 19 June Huffington Post article titled «Five Critics Say You Shouldn't Read This «Dangerous» Book,» Wade charged that his critics
were «indoctrinated in the social - science creed that
prohibits any role for evolution in
human affairs» and contended that the book's central argument «has not
been challenged
by any serious scientist.»
gree to conduct only research that
is not
prohibited by Federal law, regulations, or policies of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) or National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Reality
is that the three major U.S. cities killing the fewest pit bulls per 1,000
human residents
are Denver, which has
prohibited pit bulls since 1989; Miami, Florida, which has also
prohibited pit bulls since 1989; and San Francisco, where the pit bull sterilization ordinance authored
by Rebecca Katz cut impoundments and killing of pit bulls in half.
Most states
prohibit shooting cats
by private citizens, but allow wildlife agents, animal control officers, and police to shoot cats under certain conditions, for instance if the cat appears to
be rabid and threatening
humans or other animals.
If small domestic animals
are deemed dangerous and pose an imminent threat to
human or animal life, they may
be killed
by any means except those
prohibited by the new law.
PS I agree that there need to
be regulations
prohibiting air pollution (i.e. ejecting substances into the atmosphere that
are toxic to
humans, animals or plants or
are known to cause health problems), as requested
by a democratically elected legislature or executive branch and their appointed agencies, but that
is not «owning» the atmosphere IMO — it
is simply «protecting» it, as an asset that
is «owned»
by everyone collectively.
Section thirteen of the Canadian
Human Rights Act (CHRA) bans the electronic transmission of material that
is deemed «likely to expose persons to hatred or contempt
by reason of the fact that those persons
are identifiable on the basis of a
prohibited ground of discrimination.»
In that decision — which has
been criticized
by some as hostile to free speech rights and humanitarian efforts — the justices found that a Patriot Act provision that
prohibits providing «material support» to designated foreign terrorist organizations could
be applied to conflict - resolution advice and legal services provided
by human rights organizations to groups such as Turkey's Kurdistan Workers» Party and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
But NSBS amended its regulation to add a qualifier that says a person meeting this criterion could
be licensed, «unless council, acting in the public interest, determines that the university granting the degree unlawfully discriminates in its law student admissions or enrolment policies or requirements on grounds
prohibited by either or both the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Nova Scotia
Human Rights Act.»
This private member «
s bill will, if passed, give explicit recognition to the rights of trans people,
by adding gender identity and gender expression as
prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian
Human Rights Act and the hate crimes -LSB-...]
The Court elided the idea of the rationale for extending
human rights protection to those groups identified
by the
prohibited grounds (which, as we have just seen and as the Court itself noted,
is the idea of their vulnerability in virtue of the group characteristic) with the idea of the various contexts in which the Code seeks to protect those so identified as vulnerable, e.g. housing, service provision and employment.
These and other provisions
prohibiting arbitrary arrest and detention, the infliction of torture and other cruel inhuman or degrading treatment,
are echoed in the European Convention on
Human Rights and form part of our domestic law
by virtue of the
Human Rights Act 1998.
As most of you know, in Canada, discrimination in the private realm
is prohibited in all provinces
by the
Human Rights Acts and
by the Quebec Charter of
Human... [more]
While legislation in some provinces could easily bear a similar interpretation, others
are not as clear — in Alberta, for example, the
Human Rights Code
prohibits discrimination
by «employers.»
«If Congress passes a
Human Life Amendment to the Constitution that would
prohibit abortion except when it
was necessary to prevent the death of the mother, would you actively support its ratification
by the Texas Legislature?»
Religion
is a fundamental freedom, guaranteed in the Charter, and discrimination on the basis of creed
is prohibited by the Ontario
Human Rights Code.
Judicial powers
were bolstered
by the introduction of the
Human Rights Act in 2000, which
prohibits public authorities from breaching fundamental rights.
When a review or appeal body has not already addressed a matter of discrimination
by a regulator on a
prohibited ground, that discrimination may
be addressed
by a
human rights tribunal, exposing the regulator to a potentially significant compensation award.
Discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry or disability (including addiction)
is prohibited by BC's
Human Rights Code.
The Ontario
Human Rights Code also
prohibits discrimination against a person because the person has a relationship, association or other dealing with a person or persons who
are identified
by one of the grounds listed above.
The Court ruled in the complainant's favour, finding that
human rights law
prohibits discrimination in the workplace regardless of whether it
is perpetuated
by an employer or a co-worker.
If the Court of Appeal decision
is to stand, sexual harassment between colleagues would not
be prohibited by human rights law; we say that harassment and discrimination in the workplace
is wrong whether it comes from your boss, your coworker or an independent contractor.
This protection
is broad: in December 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada (in British Columbia
Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk) confirmed what many employment law lawyers already believed: the human rights law obligation of a «person» not to discriminate in employment prohibits discrimination against employees whenever that discrimination has a sufficient connection to employment; it's not limited to discrimination by their super
Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk) confirmed what many employment law lawyers already believed: the
human rights law obligation of a «person» not to discriminate in employment prohibits discrimination against employees whenever that discrimination has a sufficient connection to employment; it's not limited to discrimination by their super
human rights law obligation of a «person» not to discriminate in employment
prohibits discrimination against employees whenever that discrimination has a sufficient connection to employment; it
's not limited to discrimination
by their superiors.
This private member «
s bill will, if passed, give explicit recognition to the rights of trans people,
by adding gender identity and gender expression as
prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian
Human Rights Act and the hate crimes provisions of the Criminal Code.
Applicable
human rights legislation can
be complied with
by assessing candidates based on the relevant aspects of the job, and not extraneous factors that could overlap with
prohibited grounds of discrimination.
For example, although homeless people
were successful in their Charter claim in Victoria (City) v Adams, this judicial bias
is evident even in that case — the first to consider the relevance of international
human rights law, including concerns and recommendations from the CESCR, to section 7 of the Charter.284 The BC Court of Appeal in Adams upheld the trial judge's decision that the City of Victoria
was violating homeless persons» constitutional rights to life, liberty and security of the person
by prohibiting them from erecting temporary overhead shelters in public parks.285 However the Court of Appeal
was insistent on framing its decision as a negative «restraint» on government, rather than as a positive obligation.
In the face of these patchwork gaps, American
human rights groups have
been advocating for the adoption of a federal bill titled the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would
prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity
by nonreligious employers with over 15 employees.
That
was also the message delivered
by 2,587 artificial intelligence and robotics researchers and more than 15,000 other endorsers in an open letter issued last week, which endorses the call to
prohibit weapons that select and engage targets without
human intervention.