Indeed, no one has more fiercely criticized our established ideas and symbols of God than Whitehead himself, and apparently the wrath of this gentle man was aroused only
by ideas of God.
For religion is life motived
by ideas of God's will.
Some readers of the Bible are offended
by the idea of God as Thou.
I guess I was supposed to be moved by the sacrifice of Jesus; instead I was repulsed
by the idea of a God who would will such a thing.»
Indeed, in retrospect, the road traveled
by the idea of God through the Bible as a whole presents a fascinating spectacle.
Not exact matches
Those put into question your belief in the characteristics
of the
god, perhaps even the existence
of the
god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the
idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded
by people that agree with and reinforce that
idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.
I'd like to add to that the
idea that as a Christian we may be tempted to flee day to day problems
by imagining that
God will lift us out
of it all, or prayer will make it go away.
You said, «Their anger may come from the fact that they do not like the
idea that they might have to be accountable to a higher authority (
God) when they die and our witnessing to them reminds them
of this event that they have to look forward to unless they repent and accept Jesus as their Savior before they die» Make sure that you also accept Thor, Zeus, Ra, and tens
of thousands
of other
gods ever invented
by man.
Here's an
idea — show «The love
of god»
by healing the guy.
Atheist reject the
idea of a
god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all
of a
god that
of which would require unknowing
of what the term «
god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a
god doesn't exist then
by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view
of the cause, nature, and purpose
of the universe if a
god was proven to be true.
You should read «Escape from Freedom»
by Fromm and Hayek's «Road to Serfdom» to get a better
idea of why you are so attracted to your dictator -
god.
This view may be argued for in various ways: — first:
by appeal to logical laws and metaphysical necessities; — second:
by appeal to the existence and nature
of God; — third:
by appeal to causal determinism (Causal determinism is the
idea that every event is necessitated
by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws
of nature)
That biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions
of the American
idea: that government stood under the judgment
of divine and natural law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm
of conscience; that national greatness was measured
by fidelity to the moral truths taught
by revelation and inscribed in the world
by a demanding yet merciful
God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
Instead
of accommodating its usage» and so its
ideas and assumptions» a translation
of Holy Scripture should serve the end
of conversion
by employing principles that recognize Christianity as its own culture with its own language and practices, raising readers up and rooting them in a rich tradition
of translation, transforming them through the creative rationality, beauty, goodness, and truth reflective
of the triune
God who speaks his Word.
Why would the HORRIBLE HEARTLESS things done
by God qualify him as a good source for anyone's
idea of «objective morality?
Almost every
idea of God offered
by philosophers and theologians was an exception to the respective philosophical systems and not their primary exemplification — here I agree with Hartshorne.
He began
by distinguishing two levels
of knowledge.12 He then used these to reconcile the obvious tensions between the two conceptions
of brahman and the
idea of a personal
God.
Over a little more than 2000 years man has developed his own
idea of a religion that he claims pleases the
God represented
by the Bible.
Jesus» original disciples likely never thought
of him as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed
by God, but the
idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own views
of what a «son
of God» means into the faith.
The
idea of a calling or vocation is first and foremost about being called
by God, to serve Him within his world.
The major Reformers were frightened
by this move, and we have to sympathize with them It is too easy to confuse various impulses and
ideas that arise in one's mind with the guidance
of God.
For liberal Christians, such victories embody the justice
of the social gospel, the
idea that believers should do
God's work — even aid the Second Coming -
by improving society.
The actual situation has been that
by the time the encounter with Buddhism became important to Western thinkers in the nineteenth century, the traditional
idea of God was already losing convincing power.
The acronym is a bit more cumbersome, but not only is the phrase more in line with what Jesus actually wanted us to do, it is also more acceptable to the largest part
of the body
of Christ — those who have come to
God by non-Christian paths and are uncomfortable with the
idea of equating Jesus the man (the way Jesus looked physically) with
God.
Mr Deighan will have read in these pages «something very close» to the
idea that Thomistic epistemology tends to emphasise «immutable essences» and static forms, and that this emphasis has been powerfully challenged
by the success
of modern science (for example Jaeger's article in our last issue and in our September 2006 issue the editorial and the quotes from Ronald Knox's
God and the Atom).
He was surprisingly open with his
ideas and questions about
God, and we were in the midst
of discussing the forgiveness and love
of God when, as if disgusted
by himself, he said, «But you don't even know the thoughts I've had about you before we were talking.
When Maine describes Noe's ordeal in traveling through a desert
by saying, «Around him the land quivers and ripples as if still just an
idea in
God's mind,» he is making a decision to admit the Platonic image rather than impoverish the range
of language available to him.
Note: If you want to read more about this
idea of the cross being a bad thing that has been redeemed
by God for the good, I highly recommend Saved from Sacrifice
by S. Mark Heim.
Since those process categories have been connected with
ideas of God inspired
by the Bible, process theologians believe there is a chance in the twenty - first century to bring the long separated parts
of human understanding into a new, coherent relationship.
You may not know this, but lots
of god believers actually point to an old book, which was obviously written
by people promoting a religious
idea, as proof
of what their
god said.
The
idea is rather that the desecration and desolation
of the holy city were a part
of God's judgment on the wicked and a trial
of his saints as
by fire (cf. Zech 13:8 - 9; Mal 3:1 - 4).
there is no need to judge anyone
of anything, seeing christians aren't allowed to judge; so thus
by telling anyone that doesn't follow your
idea of the correct way to live that they «are going to need to get right with
god» or the ever so famous» you're going to burn in hell» speeches you are thus breaking one
of «
gods»» commands and all sin is equal in his eyes so we'll be seeing you in hell.
It means that up to now in his history, man was somehow kept in the bondage
of childhood
by the powers that be, the state, etc., and
by the
idea of a «father -
God,» so that he did not dare to affirm himself fully.
All religions today share a single, common «Ultimate» beyond them all — the set
of ideas about
God implied
by Christian religiosity.
I've often been told that the reason I have a problem with the
idea of people suffering eternally without the chance to be saved is because my sense
of justice has been perverted
by my sin nature, that it only seems unfair to me because «
God's ways are higher than our ways.»
Thus the Commission called for a Christian concern for Higher Education which helps critical rational and humanist evaluation
of both the western and Indian cultures to build a new cultural concept which subordinated religious traditions, technology and politics to personal values according to the principle «Sabbath is made for man and not man for the Sabbath», enunciated
by Jesus and illustrated in the
idea of Incarnation
of God in Christ.
War is a particular demonstration
of the power
of sin in the world and a defiance
of the righteousness
of God as revealed in Jesus Christ and him crucified» Yet the conference accepted the
idea that criteria exist
by which some wars can be regarded as just: to defend international law, or to vindicate «an essential Christian principle» such as the defense
of «victims
of wanton aggression.»
Others were bothered
by the
idea of an atheist swearing to
God.
Yet through all these diversities
of phrasing — whether faith was thought
of as a power - releasing confidence in
God, or as selfcommitment to Christ that brought the divine Spirit into indwelling control
of one's life, or as the power
by which we apprehend the eternal and invisible even while living in the world
of sense, or as the climactic vision
of Christ as the Son
of God which crowns our surrender to his attractiveness, or as assured conviction concerning great truths that underlie and constitute the gospel — always the enlargement and enrichment
of faith was opening new meanings in the experience
of fellowship with
God and was influencing deeply both the
idea and the practice
of prayer.
This development
of deepening meaning in fellowship with
God was accompanied
by significant changes in the
idea of faith.
Collins coins his own term for this
idea: «BioLogos», a clumsy term, perhaps, but intended to express the harmony between the biology and the
idea of Creation
by the Word
of God.
Of course religion is not true and there is no God, he opines, yet many of the ideas religions have spawned are «sporadically useful, interesting and consoling» and should be deliberately adapted by atheist
Of course religion is not true and there is no
God, he opines, yet many
of the ideas religions have spawned are «sporadically useful, interesting and consoling» and should be deliberately adapted by atheist
of the
ideas religions have spawned are «sporadically useful, interesting and consoling» and should be deliberately adapted
by atheists.
There are numerous avenues
by which this
idea is presented in church settings, but most often it revolves around the
idea that we serve a powerful
God, and
God has dispensed some
of that power upon all believers, but especially the leaders
of the church
by giving them wisdom, vision, and special spiritual gifts.
Such a gift might spring from varied motives — gratitude, homage, or the desire to curry favor — but obviously in the background
of the practice
of animal sacrifice was the
idea that
God liked this form
of gift and profited
by it.
They will need to learn that the body
of Christ is
of great faith - building benefit from the cradle to the grave, the Word
of God is not just a book full
of good
ideas to live
by, Jesus isn't just a good friend to have in a pinch — He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life — the only way to the Father and eternal life.
Furthermore, it is necessary to qualify the
idea of the orders
of creation
by the recognition that the original creation has been distorted
by the fall into a universal condition
of rebellion against
God's design for the world, and that the Christian faith longs for the restoration and fulfillment
of creation through the history
of God's redemption in Jesus Christ.
Once we establish the
idea that Eden was perfect, rather than it being Good and at best, Very Good, we begin a frantic journey
of a restoration
of perfection and salvation is finding a way to forgive fallen broken creation for its lapse from perfection so we can be loved
by «
God» again.
An immediate objection to the suggestion
of a new
idea of God will doubtless be that the term
God as defined
by usage properly means the
God of the religious tradition.
The concept
of ambiguity is useful to express the
idea that the orders
of creation are good as created
by God, and yet permeated
by the law
of sin and death.
Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense
of it all with a wave
of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory
of an angry
God (they called her a «vessel
of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one
of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all
of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape
of a child is part
of God's sovereign plan, even
God's
idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense
of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted
by my sin nature I can not trust it.