Sentences with phrase «by immigration decisions»

Not exact matches

The political cloud over Attorney General Jeff Sessions» decision to step back from any investigation touching the Trump campaign may have a silver lining for a law enforcement officer who appears preoccupied by violent crime, drugs and immigration.

Visa decisions will be made by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

At the second stage, you will need to apply to Immigration Refugees, and Citizenship Canada for a new work permit with the permission obtained by your employer, which can take the form of a Provincial Nomination Certificate, positive Labour Market Impact Assessment decision or approval under the Global Talents Stream of the TFWP, for instance.

Cook also said the company would provide the roughly 250 at Apple affected by the decision with the «support they need, including the advice of immigration experts.»

Our choice is simply, a president who wants to 1) increase you taxes and what everyone to pay «more» — coded as «fair share», 2) considers the poor decisions of one person to be paid for by others (everything from health care to welfare to immigration) and 3) has repeatedly lied to the american people (i.e. benghazi).

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

Eight Indonesian immigrants who have lived in a New Jersey church for months in order to avoid deportation can now leave the property thanks to a decision by immigration officials.

Parental Rights: Toolkit & Educational Resources Women's Refugee Commission Provides step - by - step instructions and resources to help migrant parents protect and maintain their parental rights and make well - informed, critical decisions regarding the care and welfare of their children in immigration cases.

«I'm genuinely astonished by the decision,» immigration lawyer Colin Yeo says.

Her decision was later overturned by a judge at a first - tier immigration tribunal — who was happy with the documents provided by the couple and satisfied the wedding was «properly executed».

There are also complaints about restrictions on appeals in immigration cases, given the often - haphazard nature of the decisions made by the Home Office.

The scandal has provided a window into the murky depths of British immigration policy and, in particular, a set of policy decisions made in 2012 by the then Home Secretary Theresa May to ensure a «Hostile Environment» aimed at supporting a drive to reduce net migration figures.

To critics of that decision, these emails, obtained through the Freedom of Information Act by the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, reveal an administration intent on seeking negative information to doom the renewal of TPS for nearly 60,000 Haitians.»

Fees for a tribunal to deal with asylum or immigration cases had risen from # 80 to # 490, a decision taken by previous Justice Secretary Michael Gove.

The full statement from shadow immigration minister Damian Green following the decision by the CPS he would not face charges.

She said: «As the Prime Minister raised today, it was a Labour immigration minister who first used the term hostile environment, wanting to and I quote, «flush out illegal immigrants» and a decision as the Prime Minister said, was taken originally by a Labour administration.

Malliotakis said she was angered by de Blasio's sanctuary city policies, including restrictions on Immigration & Customs Enforcement operations on Rikers Island, limits on the crimes that will warrant turning over a defendant to ICE and his decision to destroy records acquired in the City's municipal ID program.

«Theresa May's ideological and unwise decision to ditch the Labour government's scheme immediately she took office as home secretary has left her and her beleaguered successor with no idea how to tackle the most pernicious form of immigration: illegal entry, usually organised by people traffickers,» they wrote.

Connecticut immigration activists say that a decision by the federal government to include a question about citizenship on the 2020 U.S. census is anti-immigrant and intended to cause fear among undocumented people.

Today's decision in the Washington Alliance case demonstrates that this is not true,» says a statement by Dale Wilcox, executive director of the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), a nonprofit «public interest legal education and advocacy organization dedicated to advocating for the rights and interests of United States citizens in immigration - related matters,» according to iImmigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), a nonprofit «public interest legal education and advocacy organization dedicated to advocating for the rights and interests of United States citizens in immigration - related matters,» according to iimmigration - related matters,» according to its website.

In a decision that could affect the immigration plan President Barack Obama announced on 20 November, a federal judge decided on 21 November that the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech), an organization based in Bellevue, Washington, and affiliated with the national Communication Workers of America (CWA) union, can bring a lawsuit challenging the federal government's right to extend by executive action the authorization for foreign students to work in the United States under the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program.

In the United States v. Texas, he Supreme Court decided, by a tied vote, to uphold the decision of the lower courts, blocking President Obama's administrative actions on immigration and placing the futures of more than 5 million immigrants in limbo.

And so, perhaps, when NJEA leaders objected to the selection of Paula White because of her association with DFER, Murphy, who had breached his contract with them, made a promise he could keep, even though that decision makes Repollet look far removed from the loop of state educational leadership, makes Murphy look like Pavlov's dog when confronted with a whiff of dissension from his patron, and makes NJEA look like Pavlov himself, a metamorphosis it may welcome after a humiliating defeat of the $ 5 million campaign to unseat Senate President Steve Sweeney by replacing him with a Trump - supporting climate - change - denying immigration - foe.

In a letter to leaders of the effort to enact climate and energy legislation, Graham wrote, «I want to bring to your attention what appears to be a decision by the Obama Administration and Senate Democratic leadership to move immigration instead of energy.

According to the Court, the aim of the contested decision was not to regulate the immigration of third country nationals, but to establish a further stage in securing freedom of movement for workers between the EU and Turkey by developing the links created by their association agreement.

Given the life changing decisions made by immigration judges, arbitrary quotas should be placed on how many cases they need to rush through in any given day or week.

It would be wrong as a matter of principle if the secretary of state for the Home Department could circumvent the decision of an immigration appeal tribunal by an administrative decision.

[1] This is an application brought by the applicant, Navjeen Kaberwal («Kaberwal»), for judicial review of a decision made by the Ministry of the Economy, Immigration Services («Ministry») on December 31, 2012 suspending Kaberwal's right to submit applications to the Ministry for a period of two years.

Most significant has been last week's decision by Justice Russel Zinn of the Federal Court in Construction and Specialized Workers» Union, Local 1611 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration).

Justice Rosalie Abella, for the majority in a 5 - 2 decision, held that in rigidly adhering to this triumvirate of adjectives, immigration officers fettered their discretion by treating them as mandatory requirements limiting the equitable humanitarian and compassionate discretion in s. 25 of the Immigration and Refugee Protimmigration officers fettered their discretion by treating them as mandatory requirements limiting the equitable humanitarian and compassionate discretion in s. 25 of the Immigration and Refugee ProtImmigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Some immigration lawyers express concern that this process will undermine the quality of the decisions made by the Immigration and Refimmigration lawyers express concern that this process will undermine the quality of the decisions made by the Immigration and RefImmigration and Refugee Board.

Additional Resources American Bar Association Commission on Immigration American Immigration Lawyers Association Amnesty International Country Reports Asylum Pro Se Guide — English (Create by students at Stanford Law) Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, University of California, Hastings College of the Law (includes resources for gender law and asylum) Department of Justice Country Conditions Research Detention Watch Network EOIR Virtual Law Library (with BIA precedent decisions) Human Rights Watch, Country Specific Reports Human Rights Watch, Children's Rights Division Immigrant Legal Resource Center Immigration Equality (includes extensive resources for LGBT asylum claims) Immigration and Nationality Act Immigration Regulations (C.F.R. Title 8) National Immigrant Justice Center's Resources for Attorneys Representing Asylum Seekers (includes numerous free training webinars) UNHCR Guidance Report on LGBT Asylum Claims United Nations High Commission on Refugees USCIS Guidance on Adjudicating LGBT Asylum Claims University of Minnesota Human Rights Library / Refugee and Asylum Resources U.S. State Department Country Reports Women on the Run, UNHCR Report (resources for female asylum - seekers) Women's Human Rights Net Yale Law School's Refugee & Asylum Resources (includes several resources for gender - based asylum claims)

The idea of crowdfunding for access to justice also gathered momentum in October, with the Howard League for Penal Reform and Prisoners Advice Service crowdfunding for their challenge to the legal aid cuts for prison law and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants also using CrowdJustice to raise funds to challenge the government's decision to increase asylum and immigration tribunal fees by up to 500 %.

Procedural fairness speaks to the principle that persons affected by the proceedings should have the opportunity: (i) to present their case fully and fairly, and (ii) have any decision affecting their rights, interests, or privileges made using a fair, impartial and open process: see Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.

The applicant in Francis v. Canada (Immigration and Citizenship), 2012 FC 1141 was concerned that she had not got a fair shake before the Refugee Protection Division, on the basis of comments made by the decision - maker in previous academic writings.

A refusal by a senior immigration judge to order reconsideration of a case by a panel of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal can therefore only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is notimmigration judge to order reconsideration of a case by a panel of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal can therefore only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is notImmigration Tribunal can therefore only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is not available.

Stratas cites the SCC's recent decision in Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)(in which the court set aside the rejection of a humanitarian residency application) as a «baffling» case where the court flouted its own principle of «legislative supremacy» by ignoring Parliament's expressly stated intent that the Federal Court of Appeal should have the final say in the matter.

As it seems that the decision made is that the points you have been assessed by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP) have not met the amount required in their invitation to you.

By requiring tribunals to make decisions on immigration law, in which they do not have specialist knowledge, there may also be practical difficulties, especially where claimants are unrepresented.

On June 25th, 2012, the Federal Court of Appeal denied the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) appeal of the decision by the Minister of Immigration to appoint the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC) as the Regulator of Immigration Consultants.

[120] The assessment cites the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Harb v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCA 39, in support of a statement that «membership in an organization implies the existence of an institutional link between the organization and an individual, accompanied by more than a nominal involvement in the activities of the organization».

The Supreme Court of Canada struck a compassionate note today as it set aside a decision by the former Ministry of Immigration to reject the post-refugee application on humanitarian grounds of a child fleeing war.

The case overturns a Court of Appeal ruling which allowed an appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to Sudan.

As the decision states: «Officers should not fetter their discretion by treating them as if they were mandatory requirements that limit the equitable humanitarian and compassionate discretion anticipated by [the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act].»

It was a decision made by an immigration judge.»

In a 5 - 2 decision written by Justice Rosalie Abella, the SCC found that the immigration officer applied the guidelines so rigidly as to misconstrue them, ignoring the purpose of the provisions granting ministerial discretion in the first place — namely, to allow for compassion where appropriate.

«There have been very little decisions taken regarding the recent arrivals by the immigration and refugee board,» he said.

Parental Rights: Toolkit & Educational Resources Women's Refugee Commission Provides step - by - step instructions and resources to help migrant parents protect and maintain their parental rights and make well - informed, critical decisions regarding the care and welfare of their children in immigration cases.

I have been touched by family matters, motherhood, immigration, stage of life difficulties, making difficult decisions and changing my life course.