It also rests on something deeper than speculation about an infinitely prolonged life in the form of what is often meant
by immortality of the soul.
Not exact matches
Nowhere does Bingham give careful attention to how
soul and
immortality have actually been used
by religious communities, nor does he admit explicitly that Churchland's remarks on germs versus demons and the pitting
of Ptolemy against Galileo amounts to saying that religious terms are comparable to pre-Copernican astronomical theories.
The real task is to explain the
immortality of the whole person without minimizing the value
of the body dimension
by postponing its inclusion or presenting it as an eventual addition to the real person, the
soul.
«Foreword,» The Father Shore: An Anthology
of World Opinion on the
Immortality of the
Soul, edited
by Nathaniel Edward Griffin and Lawrence Hunt (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1934), xvii.
5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day
of wrath and revelation
of the righteous judgment
of God; 6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds: 7 To them who
by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and
immortality, eternal life: 8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, 9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every
soul of man that doeth evil,
of the Jew first, and also
of the Gentile; Romans 2:1 - 9 (KJV)
The instrument may perish but the tune survives and, as it is often argued
by those who would attempt to bring «
immortality of the
soul» and some residual meaning
of «resurrection'together into a single conception, that tune might very well be played on another instrument if one does not accept the idea that tunes can exist, so to say, without any expression through some instrumentality.
In this particular context, Whitehead is presenting his own resolution to the problem posed
by the fluency and transience
of the world, so subjective
immortality of the
soul takes on the guise
of a discarded alternative.
The important consideration here is that primitive Christianity interpreted the rising again
of Jesus Christ in this fashion, and not
by a conception
of the
soul's
immortality.
Whitehead approaches the question
of man's desire for
immortality, not
by following the traditional path
of the
soul as having substance, but that every act, every event, every realization
of value has everlasting significance and contributes everlastingly to the nature
of things.
Moreover, if the personal
immortality of the
soul is effected
by God and God alone, then the resurrection
of the body in its immortal dimension would also be God's act.
Selman, on the other hand, seeks to subvert this same trend
by constructing an extended argument in favour
of the
immortality of the
soul (chapter 10).
McCabe had already said in an earlier talk on «The
Immortality of the
Soul» that «the subsistence of the soul has no more content» for Aquinas than that «a man has an operation by his soul which is not an operation of the body&raq
Soul» that «the subsistence
of the
soul has no more content» for Aquinas than that «a man has an operation by his soul which is not an operation of the body&raq
soul has no more content» for Aquinas than that «a man has an operation
by his
soul which is not an operation of the body&raq
soul which is not an operation
of the body».
[15] Whether the
immortality of the
soul can be proved
by human reason is a traditional subject
of debate among theologians.
Reinhold Niebuhr wrote in 1939, «The idea
of the resurrection
of the body is a Biblical symbol in which modern minds find the greatest offence and which has long since been displaced in most modern versions
of the Christian faith
by the idea
of the
immortality of the
soul.61
Thus, out hope is in the Resurrection, and not in the purported «
immortality of the «
Soul»» as espoused
by the Greeks.
They have confused «
immortality of the
soul» with whatever may be intended
by the biblical phrase «resurrection
of the body»; while theologians have attempted, as we have already observed, when I described the older scheme which comprised the last things, to bring the two conceptions together in a fashion which will retain each
of them and yet relate them so that a consistent pattern may be provided.
The churches
of Christendom have also been rejected
by «the only true God», for they have accepted and continue to promote false religious ideologies, such as the trinity, hellfire,
immortality of the
soul.
Corresponding to the
immortality of the
soul, as depicted
by the Greek philosophers, there is a particular judgment immediately after death.
One can therefore divert oneself
by reflecting how strange it is that precisely in our age when everyone is able to accomplish the highest things doubt about the
immortality of the
soul could be so widespread, for the man who has really made even so much as the movement
of infinity is hardly a doubter.
No good purpose is served
by concealing this fact, as is often done today when things that are really incompatible are combined
by the following type
of over-simplified reasoning: that whatever in early Christian teaching appears to us irreconcilable with the
immortality of the
soul, viz. the resurrection
of the body, is not an essential affirmation for the first Christians but simply an accommodation to the mythological expressions
of the thought
of their time, and that the heart
of the matter is the
immortality of the
soul.
Even those who believe in the
immortality of the
soul do not have the hope
of which Paul speaks, the hope which expresses the belief
of a divine miracle
of new creation which will embrace everything, every part
of the world created
by God.
At this stage it is quite clear that «Everyman» entertains the hope
of immortality, and these numerous texts are the means
by which the
soul is supposed to be able to make its way through the nether world.
Tertullian (A.D. 155 - 220): «For some things are known even
by nature: the
immortality of the
soul, the instance, is held
by many... I may use, therefore, the opinion
of Plato, when he declares: «Every
soul is immortal»»
The widespread misunderstanding that the New Testament teaches the
immortality of the
soul was actually encouraged
by the rock - like post-Easter conviction
of the first disciples that the bodily Resurrection
of Christ had robbed death
of all its horror, (But hardly in such a way that the original Christian community could speak
of «natural» dying.
Put his The Riddle
of the Universe alongside Adams's masterwork and you can see how neatly Haeckel solves Adams's problem about unity
by getting rid
of free will, religion, and the
immortality of the
soul (that it is immortal «is the highest point
of superstition») and
by his theory
of spontaneous generation (his zoological Big Bang that needs no Banger).
William
of Occam recognized the authority
of the Church in spiritual matters and said that, although they can not be proved, such tenets
of Christianity as the existence
of God and the
immortality of the
soul must be believed because they are taught
by the Church and the Bible.
Delta
immortality was the position taken early on
by American Reform Judaism, as expressed in this official statement from the 1885 Pittsburgh platform: «We assert the doctrine
of Judaism that the
soul is immortal, founding this belief on the divine nature
of the human spirit, which forever finds bliss in righteousness and misery in wickedness.
For the locus
of Omega
immortality is not the individual
soul per se, but the complete society created
by God's love, in which individuality is realized in fellowship.
5 But in accordance with your hardness and your impenitent heart you are treasuring up for yourself wrath in the day
of wrath and revelation
of the righteous judgment
of God, 6 who «will render to each one according to his deeds»: [a] 7 eternal life to those who
by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and
immortality; 8 but to those who are self - seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness — indignation and wrath, 9 tribulation and anguish, on every
soul of man who does evil,
of the Jew first and also
of the Greek; 10 but glory, honor, and peace to everyone who works what is good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
Some theologians today prefer not to use the term «
immortality» when they speak
of the future life, lest the Greek idea
of the natural
immortality of the
soul be suggested
by it.
Denial
of the innate
immortality of the
soul was sometimes expressed (for example,
by Peripatetics), but such denials were unfashionable, especially since the consecratio
of a dead emperor involved the belief that his
soul had been carried into heaven.
Otto Rank (at one time a protege
of Freud), broke with his master and posited that we are, rather, motivated
by the undeniable conflict between our sense
of ourselves as «immortal
souls,» and our realization that we exist
by virtue
of our all - too - mortal bodies, that we are desperate to believe that we will, somehow, live beyond our bodies, and that, in order to do so, we pursue «
immortality projects,» that we invest in our activities the promise
of eternal life.