Not exact matches
Being the scientist that you are, I am surprised that the drug having not been approved
by the FDA for the specific use
of labor induction would not have you raising at least one eyebrow.
I am stating that Cytotec was NEVER approved,
by the FDA, to be used in the
induction of labor.
While not fool - proof, some women decide to avoid the medical
induction (therefore limiting the associated interventions)
by trying natural means
of getting
labor started.
Also, the number
of Cesarean sections dropped
by 50 percent, oxytocin use for
labor induction decreased
by 40 percent, forceps use
by 40 percent, and the average length
of labor by 25 percent.
I have friends who lost their babies to preventable home birth accidents, attended
by negligent midwives, and yet other friends who have lost babies because they refused
induction of labor against the advice
of their medical provider.
It has not been approved
by the FDA for the
induction of labor.
Recent declines in
induction of labor by gestational age.
Unless it is the last resort, avoid medical intrusions such as
labor induction, routine IV, delivery assisted
by use
of forceps, C - section, vacuum extraction, and episiotomy (rarely used nowadays).
«A better understanding
of the pathways activated
by telomere fragments and their contribution to fetal membrane senescence may contribute to the design
of more effective
labor assessment, perhaps including preterm birth risk and direct medical interventions for
labor induction or prevention.»
While castor oil's effects on
labor induction are still debated, the consumption
of castor oil
by pregnant woman has been shown to induce nausea.