Sentences with phrase «by intelligent people»

You do not once provide any scientific evidence to back up your claims but spout the regurgitated rubbish which was dismissed by all intelligent people years ago.

If the Wii's controls make it a bad system, why are its competitors, companies run by intelligent people, rushing to match the same «gimmick» that defines the system?

Anywhere from 4 hrs to 3 days on low carb has been utilized by intelligent people with great results.

If these are in conflict, as indeed they seem to many critics to be, then the notion of revelation will not be taken seriously by intelligent people.

It might take a while for some of these companies to have $ 20 billion in revenue, but I see a much more robust crop of serious companies that are well financed that are run by intelligent people and are tapped into the trends of where technology is going.»

The present government is not at all manned by intelligent peoples capable of taking bold decision in respect of Yemen conflict.

Any studies that have tried to prove the connection between high cholesterol and poor health have now been dismissed and disproved and seen by any intelligent person as pure fraudulent quackery.

Not exact matches

We have experienced steady and intentional growth and feel fortunate to be surrounded by a team of intelligent and passionate people.

The Mobile Vaani network makes use of an intelligent IVR (interactive voice response) system that allows people to make a free call into a number and leave a message about their community, or listen to messages left by others.

• «It's remarkable how much long - term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent.

So a large number of good and smart people in good faith developed an investing strategy that they thought was supported by the peer - reviewed research but in reality was the OPPOSITE of what the peer - reviewed research would support once all the peer - reviewed research needed to make intelligent choices had been published.

If you have been reading personal finance website for awhile, you may have noticed a trend towards ridiculing those who make intelligent financial decisions by constructing this fictional «average person» and describing how some handicap would prevent this «average person» from being able to share in that success.

He is as a grown and intelligent man giving he choice to the person that is affected by it, the woman carrying the baby.

Colin is obviously a critical thinker who is far to intelligent to be judged by the likes of people who believe in a imaginary god and as $ backwards religious book that promotes hate and bigotry.

By «intelligent» do you mean only people who agree with your misguided opinions?

I think its a fantastic idea to «create your own religion,» but I know of no intelligent person who would say that «man exists by accident,» so I have no idea what that's supposed to mean.

Since when did people of the Bronze Age were ever less intelligent or developed than we are today other than certain technological advancements, which by the way not even everything technologically speaking is necessarily more advance today it was say two thousand, three thousand, or even four thousand years ago, so I have no idea where you get that reasoning from.

My own way of explaining this phenomenon is that these young people (who are most intelligent and can not be fooled by so much sham in present society) are really looking for a meaningful faith, for a satisfying form of transcendence.

If persons were only intelligent organisms with finite wants, the problem of adjusting demand and supply could in principle be easily settled by rational calculation.

Chad the Sumerian said, «Any reasonably intelligent person could only conclude He was in fact real by suspending rational inquiry in that matter.»

The larger problem that I have with this type of argument is that the evidentiary issues re: God have been very thoroughly argued out by 2500 years of philosophers, some of whom must have been the most intelligent people ever to occupy the Earth.

Modern, intelligent people are finally starting to reject the indoctrination from birth by society and are accepting science, logic, and reason instead of archaic myths.

Given all those who have, over the centuries, rejected God through nothing more than a healthy, intelligent skepticism, or who have otherwise committed mortal sins, there must be literally thousands of millions of people burning for all eternity in the cosmic oven of hell set up by their all - loving god.

Christianity, socialism, and feminism are all alike in the sense that each has a logic of its own and attracts a wide following, while also being opposed by many well - informed and intelligent persons.

I am embarrassed by some of the people that call themselves Christians and give the rest of Christianity a bad name... many Christians are well - informed, intelligent, and open - minded.

With all the evidence, religious people ought to be intelligent design (I mean god - guided evolution by this) supporters at worst, though I would hope that after some serious thoughts on the moral paradoxes induced by belief in the «divine» people would come to their senses.

Bering said: «I am by no means saying that religion is a bad thing nor that religious people are less intelligent.

In the end, I can't argue any point by saying «I am right, because people who agree with me have a statistically significant tendency to be more intelligent than people who disagree».

Such questions can be difficult - either inherently or contingently so» and imperfect or even unsound positions can be adopted by intelligent and well - informed people who are doing their very best to think honestly and carefully about them.

«In my own opinion this debate is fuelled by an overoptimism in what can be achieved with AI algorithms, as well as an underestimating of how intelligent people really are.

God = the creator which always was (intelligent source of everything) By the way God is probably not a person, it could be a feeling, an emotion etc..

bob — By intelligent, do you mean people like yourself who don't know how to use basic punctuation, and use phrases like «more dumber» and use the word «then» instead of «than»?

Your life isn't pointless if you win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; you earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; you appreciate beauty, to find the best in others; you leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived.

I can't imagine anyone sitting around thinking to themselves: «Gee, I wonder whether I should choose to be straight, which is considered normal and acceptable; or perhaps choose to be gay, which is roundly condemned by a large percentage of otherwise intelligent people, considered a sin by many churches, was once illegal in most states, will likely result in my being shunned, abused, ridiculed, abandoned, abused, and beaten — possibly killed; will deny me many rights and advantages available to married people; may cost me jobs; and which in general will set me outside of society, marginalized and ostracized.

And by the way, I am not looking for answers and I won't read any more comments... Yes, because I am a «closed minded» person unlike your intelligent tolerant selves.

Is it really necessary today to remind intelligent people, whether Christians or not, that there is a difference between recognizing that such a view was held by Socrates and accepting it, between recognizing a hope as primitive Christian and sharing it oneself?

Any attempt at applying «logic» to explain the bible by people who are believers and still think of themselves as rather intelligent (self - delusion is a symptom / cause of religious belief) always ends up in ridiculous arguments...

Our rationale was that any mature commitment that intelligent young people might make to a religious faith should be critically tested by the very best opponents.

It is a job that should be filled by an intelligent hard - working person with qualifications much higher than the average person and they should be compensated accordingly.

Always fascinated by people that use words like skeptical, and seemto be intelligent, but then claim to have «strong faith».

Nevertheless, the book has been a great success commercially and, judging by the credentials of her reviewers and the fervor of her advocates, many intelligent and thoughtful people have been persuaded by her views.

Prayer is sometimes used by stupid people, but it is also used by very intelligent people, as is meditation.

«Civilization depends upon vigorous pursuit of the highest values by people who are intelligent enough to know that their values are qualified by their interests and corrupted by their prejudices.»

'' That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by accepted scientific method.

Well, I would think that people would be intelligent enough to recognize that all we see and experience is by a design and realize that the entire universe is calibrated like an expensive watch.

It was assumed by many white people that blacks were less intelligent and more violent and that was used against them in the past as well.

however, the point is that even these intelligent people can be warped by religion into turning off their brains, or at least the logic and reasoning parts.

The goal of scientific research is to attempt to resolve contradictions by developing richer and more sophisticated theories - and this is entirely and perfectly consistent with the development of any intelligent person's belief about God.

Under the influence of scientism, the Enlightenment's exaltation of reason, modern philosophy and the suspicions cast by social science many intelligent people today suspect that religious symbols are no more than psychic or social «projections.»

Another objection to the Christian Faith which is felt, if not expressed, by many intelligent people is that it appears to attract the immature and seeks to perpetuate their immaturity.