Praising a series of justices, Hittinger says that they «did not mean by fundamental rights a blank check that could be filled in
by judicial discretion.»
Not exact matches
'' [t] he judge will... be forced to decide in advance of trial — and without hearing the evidence — whether he will forgo entirely his
judicial discretion to impose some sentence of imprisonment and abandon his responsibility to consider the full range of punishments established
by the legislature.
The supreme courts of both Canada and the USA ignore the rule of law and the corresponding sovereignty of the people
by means of adopting «the rule of
judicial discretion» as an alternative to legislated constitutional amendment.
Based upon complaints filed
by, among others, Washington DC based
Judicial Watch, the Commission had sought to remove Judge Kendall from the bench on the basis of criticisms of his bail and sentencing decisions in specific cases, none of which had ever been appealed and each of which was soundly within his legal
discretion.
The Sentencing Working Group, chaired
by Lord Justice Gage, is currently considering two main proposals: adoption of an American - style grid system that would drastically restrict
judicial discretion and establishment of a Sentencing Commission that could be required to tailor sentencing guidelines to fit the size of the prison estate.
The Court of Appeal held — on a more or less technical
judicial review basis — that the decision not to call J was within the local authority's
discretion and could not be set aside
by judicial review.
The article authored
by Lauren Witten is titled «Proportionality As a Moral Process: Reconceiving
Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimum Penalties,» and here is its abstract:
Plaintiff contends the judge abandoned any and all independence in
judicial discretion or liberty he may have wished to exercise when, he accepted the introduction of the legal briefs submitted
by counsel.
The AG who can fulfil their duties with
judicial discretion and independence is a keeper even if they are considered the «white tiger of the legal profession»
by some.
Justice Brown found that the whether or not the court should exercise its
discretion to hear a moot appeal, is guided
by the following test: (i) whether the issues can be well and fully argued
by parties who have a stake in the outcome; (ii) the concern for
judicial economy; and (iii) the need for the court to remain alive to the proper limits of its law - making function in order to avoid intrusions into the role of the legislative branch.
The governor will make
judicial appointments with full
discretion, which must then be confirmed
by the senate.
Reducing
judicial sentencing
discretion means that judges are less able to consider the circumstances of the offence and ensuring that any sentence is responsive to the historic disadvantage experienced
by offenders from marginalized groups, including women.
Reasons for judgement were released this week
by the BC Court of Appeal addressing the current landscape of
judicial discretion when awarding costs in cases with formal settlement offers in play.
In my continued efforts to track the
judicial discretion of costs awards following trials with formal settlement offers in place, reasons for judgement were released recently
by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing costs consequences were a jury award was some 25 % of ICBC's best pre-trial formal settlement offer.
These principles recognize the critical importance of
judicial sentencing
discretion and suggest the touchstone of federal sentencing should be district courts exercising reasoned judgment in response to case - specific factors and broader norms established
by the Constitution and Congress.
Concerns about limiting
judicial discretion were raised
by the Committee of Chief Judges but several speakers noted that trial courts would retain
discretion over the remaining 50 % of any unclaimed class action residual funds.
This approach was, however, criticised
by the minority on the basis that it was too vague and too wide, converting a legal principle into the exercise of
judicial discretion.
87 % of Americans and 83 % of Republicans believe that mandatory minimums for nonviolent offenders should be replaced
by a system focused on
judicial discretion.
The legislation, led
by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, improves
judicial discretion at sentencing for low level offenders and helps inmates successfully reenter society, while tightening penalties for violent criminals and preserving key prosecutorial tools for law enforcement.
Accordingly, while the right to damages for an accident is vested at the time of the accident, it can be differentiated from the entitlement to prejudgment interest as it's subject to
judicial discretion, meaning that there is no inherent right to any rate of interest until it is determined
by a judge.
As was stated
by L'Heureux - Dube J. in Willick at p. 734, «the diversity of possible scenarios in family law dictates that courts maintain a flexible standard of
judicial discretion which does not artificially limit the adaptability of the Divorce Act provisions».
By contrast,
judicial discretion over sentencing does not seem to pose a similar danger, perhaps because of an assumption that the judiciary will in general be more sympathetic to the liberty interests of the defendant.
In «Collusion:
Judicial Discretion vs.
Judicial Deception — The Impending Meltdown of the United States Federal
Judicial System,» released in late December, Donovan details the alleged collusion he witnessed firsthand while representing clients in In Re: Oil Spill
by the Oil Rig «Deepwater Horizon» in The Gulf of Mexico, or MDL 2179, over the past seven years.
First, recent Tory amendments whittling away at
judicial discretion in sentencing
by increasing the number of offences subject to mandatory minimum penalties will only create new and more tragic examples of cases where a manifestly unjust sentence is required
by statute.
At present, a distinction is often drawn between restrictions imposed
by European legislation, for example on habitat protection, and that offered
by domestic law; European requirements are often shown greater deference
by decision makers, and
by the courts when
discretion to quash (in
judicial and statutory review cases) is considered.
A provision adds that decisions
by the Fund are final, subject to
judicial review, and that the Committee has absolute
discretion.
The overriding fact in this case admitted
by the KBA, is that the attorneys lied to Judge Bamberger, and he is now to be punished
by the KBA for exercising his proper
judicial discretion.
Appellant argues that the trial court abused its
discretion by taking «
judicial notice» of a medical dictionary as a «learned treatise.»
Following the introductory section to the U.S. Code's chapter on
judicial review of administrative agency decisions (5 U.S.C. Section 701), the amici state that
judicial review ought to be presumptively available absent (1) a statute precluding
judicial review, or (2) the FDIC's action being committed to its
discretion by law.
It goes further
by allowing, subject to
judicial discretion, evidence of disposition which falls short of a conviction or acquittal but represents a type of behaviour, referred to as «other reprehensible behaviour» within CJA 2003.
US experience is also that even when
judicial sentencing
discretion is severely restricted, the growth of the prison population can still be affected
by a variety of factors.
Where an order apparently infringed LP or LPP, absent a justification in main legislation, it could be saved only
by a case management code, and not a regime of
judicial discretion.
If this court now concludes that all these cases were wrongly decided they present an open road and a fast car to the money maker who disapproves of the principles developed
by the House of Lords that now govern the exercise of the
judicial discretion in big money cases.»
- In relation to the admission
by the media, and any others with an interest in the proceedings, the Family Justice Council proposed a statutory checklist to guide the exercise of
judicial discretion in determining such an application.
Increasingly, the workings of civil society and government are frustrated
by an idea that unwritten rules or
judicial discretion can trump written laws.
The Committee is concerned
by the government bill in which it would be stated, contrary to a
judicial decision, that ratification of human rights treaties does not create legitimate expectations that government officials will use their
discretion in a manner that is consistent with those treaties.
Others have represented this bill
by claiming that it eliminates
judicial discretion.
Although any presumption cries out for the exception in an area as idiosyncratic, and, as Judge Mack points out, [FN198] as important custody law, the benefits of limiting
judicial discretion can outweigh the disadvantages, provided the standard adopted relates directly to the child's welfare and is not applied
by rote.