Sentences with phrase «by junk science»

The issue we face of extreme importance is why global warming is being marketed to the masses worldwide supported by junk science and government funding.

The Swamp holds many dark secrets that are illumed by junk science.

Over at Crooked Timber, Daniel Davies demolishes the latest effort by junk science writer Steve Milloy (on diet and diabetes), and admonishes Todd Zywicki of the Volokh Conspiracy for giving uncritical credence to Milloy, who has a track record of bogus work going back at least a decade, to his work for the tobacco companies, trying to cast doubt on the link between smoking and lung cancer.

The days of many politicians being conned by the junk science of the warming alarmists is almost over.

It was sustained by junk science and «alternative facts» about how many birds outdoor cats kill each year.

Not exact matches

His junk science and pseudo-scientific misinformation was shown to be flawed by the APA and every major child welfare organization.

But you have no problem twisting decades - old, oft debunked junk science into» proof» that there is an evil secret agenda driven by thousands of health professionals, distinguished mental health physicians, and the gay community at large.

Interesting discussion — Totally agree about the «punching above their weight» problem with the current spate of «popular» atheists and junk writers, as well as the «Hollywood» treatment of Pullman, but you don't need to wade through Pullman's trilogy to get a useful insight into institutionalism vs genuine spirituality — just pick up the excellent «The Dragon in the Sea» by Dune author Frank Herbert or «The Moon is a Harsh Mistress» by Robert Heinlien — great works from the Golden Age of Science Fiction literature.

Started in 1987 by psychologist Paul Cameron, the Family Research Institute (FRI) has become the anti-gay movement's main source for what Cameron claims is «cutting - edge research» — but is, in fact, completely discredited junk science pushed out by a man who has been condemned by three professional organizations.

The only major news outlet to pick up on the story, though was Fox News, whose report by «Junk Science» columnist Steve Milloy here arguably represents a new low in propaganda masquerading as science journalism.Milloy does not mention that Esper et al is an opinion piece, not a research aScience» columnist Steve Milloy here arguably represents a new low in propaganda masquerading as science journalism.Milloy does not mention that Esper et al is an opinion piece, not a research ascience journalism.Milloy does not mention that Esper et al is an opinion piece, not a research article.

The more healthy foods you introduce little by little, the more you will start losing the taste for junk food — there is a whole science behind this method, but I just wanted to make it as simple as possible.

, Kurt Russell Drops Out of Django Unchained, Argo Trailer, Gangster Squad Trailer 49:25 — Other Stuff We Watched: Saturday Night Live, Kicking It, English Premiere League Soccer, Demons, Demons II, Haywire, Assault on a Queen, The Asphyx, Platform Moon, Face Off, The Silent Partner, Shark Night, Road to Perdition, Ed Wood, Veep, The Pitch, Celebrity Apprentice 1:40:00 — Junk Mail: Too Negative, Director's Voices + Beakman's World vs. Bill Nye the Science Guy, Tony Stark Meets the General, Cult / Character Actors in Blockbusters, Darren Aronofsky's Noah, Being Approached by Film Junk Fans, Nothing But Trouble, Spielberg vs. Kubrick vs. Nolan vs. Tarantino 2:07:30 — This Week's DVD Releases 2:09:30 — Outro

Looks can often be deceiving, as RoboCop is, underneath the junk cinema exterior, one of the more intelligent and savvy thrillers of the science fiction genre, perhaps only bested by The Terminator in terms of blending intelligent, complex sci - fi with all - out supercharged action.

After researching the topic, I got interested in the idea of «junk science»; that interest was heightened by a widely publicized product liability lawsuit in which claims were made that leaks from silicone breast implants were causing serious illnesses in women.

(Just last week, Alley Cat Allies delivered more than 55,000 signatures to the Smithsonian Institution in response to the publication earlier this year of agenda - driven junk science produced by researchers at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.)

Cat Wars is, to anybody familiar with the topic, an obviously desperate attempt to fuel the ongoing witch - hunt against outdoor cats «by any means necessary,» including the endorsement of discredited junk science, an oceanful of red herrings, and B - movie - style scaremongering.

We did not get to the moon in the 1960s by using junk science!

Joe Bastardi, senior AccuWeather.com meteorologist's open letter to presidential candidates concerning anthropogenic global warming will likely be thoroughly ignored by media far more interested in spreading the unproven junk science of Nobel Laureate Al Gore than advancing the discussion concerning this controversial issue.

With the significant funds made available by Exxon - Mobil and others for debunking what they call junk science, you might think that some persuasive mechanistic theories and testable predictions would be forthcoming.

By the way, if you guys really believe that, as an expert told you, «newspapers essentially never use op ed space for op eds directly rebutting other op eds,» then maybe it'd be better to offer to engage the denialists» larger themes anyway: their junk science, their tarring of you all as «alarmists,» their idea that what's genuinely alarming is really only the concoction of a «science - journalism complex.»

I am all for requisite restraint with regard to political rhetoric also, but for someone with next - to - no knowledge of the topic like me, your critiques of the «Junk Science» found by mainstream pundits is probably the most valuable function your site provides.

Even people who don't agree with me on everything and are somewhat of a skeptical bent should see some advantage in making common cause to get rid of the junk science arguments being made by a lot of the skeptics.

We don't need another ice age.Forget all the junk science by so - called experts that are all in on the multi-billion dollar «climate research scam».

so, I guess my explanations referring to the scientific status of knowledge helps a bit to understand why Holmes» claim is a hoax and to prevents public from junk - science distributed by climate deniers.

Milloy ran a Web site called Junk Science, joined in time by Climate Audit and Ice Cap and a thousand others, all hammering the same message — ignore global warming.

But that won't happen until the «junk science» represented by this paper «disappears», rather than the solid contradictory data that this paper «disappeared».

I think this comes mostly from Junk Science's website, and their version of it is even more extreme -LRB-.07 C by 2050).

It specifies temperature and notes the claim from Junk Science of.07 C savings by 2050.

Also, the «Complaints Rejection Unit» in the ABC is determined to deny proof that some of the stuff put out by the Science Show etc is junk, and they give strange interpretations of their Editorial Policies.

There is clearly now so much junk in the body of climate science literature relied upon by the IPCC that only rigorous examination of their inputs, methods and results would have any hope of establishing the veracity of their conclusions.

These uni-dimensional junk science professors are confident in their intellectual abilities to continue getting away with indulging in their idle speculations and spreading their flapdoodle about things that have proven to be untrue; and, they demand that we appoint them as elites to rule over the rest of us despite a complete absence of supporting evidence for their many predictions that have been falsified by real - world observations.

Horner posed for a photo with Marc Morano, Steve Milloy of Junk Science, and Steven Goddard / Tony Heller at what appeared to be an event promoting Morano's new book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, by Regnery Publishing.

Yet they collude by embracing trendy, rigid, group hysteria inflamed, secular religions such as this latest one, courtesy of paid advertising professionals flogging what is often unquestioned junk science.

So true... Fear of global warming has been great for academia and the Left from the beginning because it, «makes industry and capitalism look bad while affording endless visuals of animals and third - world humans suffering at the hands of wealthy Westerners,» as Van Dyke noticed, plus: «Best of all, being driven by junk - science that easily metamorphoses as required, it appeared to be endlessly self - sustaining.»

Those who point out the problems of making arguments for policy on the back of PR stunts and junk science are labelled as «sceptics» or «deniers», motivated by profit, «ideology» or simple bad - mindedness rather than the desire for a sensible debate about our relationship with the natural environment and concern about development.

How do we get back all that money we've had taken from us by our governments and spunked on their cronies at Solyndra and BrightSource or thrown casually into grants for junk science research like «ocean acidification» or squandered on shysters at tainted institutions like NASA, NOAA and the Royal Society or wasted on anti-capitalist bureaucracies like the EPA and the Department of Energy and Climate Change?

Both, he contends, are examples of junk science, supported by intellectual elites who will later conveniently forget they signed on to such craziness.

A closed circle of EPA and IPCC reviewers — accompanied by a massive taxpayer - funded public relations and propaganda campaign — must no longer be allowed to rubberstamp junk science that is used to justify federal diktats.

Scientists are as much victims of fashion as ordinary mortals are — a fact illustrated by the rich history of junk science and false alarms of the last 30 years.

The Air Vent All Models are Wrong Bart Verheggen Bernie Lewin Better Figures by Doug McNeall The Blackboard Bob Tisdale Cameron Rose Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Global Food Issues, Hudson Institute Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, The Heartland Institute Climate audit by Steve McIntyre The Climate Bet Climate Depot by Marc Morano Climate in Review, by C. Jeffery Small Climate Lessons Climate Policy, The Heritage Foundation Climate Resistance Climate Scientists» Register ClimateWiki Collide - a-Scape (Discover Magazine) Cooler Heads Digest Digging in the Clay by Verity Jones E-FACT Report by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) GlobalClimateScam.com Global Science Report GlobalWarming.org Global Warming, Cato Institute Green World Trust by Lucy Skywalker Gust of Hot Air by Jonathan Lowe Harmless Sky Haunting the Library ICECAP by Joseph D'Aleo International Climate Science Coalition International Conferences on Climate Change, The Heartland Institute Joe Bastardi JoNova, hosted by Joanne Nova Judy Curry Junk Science by Steve Milloy Master Resource Met Office Mike Hulme Nigel Calder Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change by Craig Idso et al..

It would be nice to think that having narrowly escaped being written off by future historians as yet another of those junk science eco-loons who helped foment what I describe in my book Watermelons as «the biggest and most expensive outbreak of mass hysteria in history», Nurse will now stick to what he knows best: proper, falsifiable, empirical science — as opposed to post normal science and left - leaning activism.

Peden wrote, «' Real Climate» is a staged and contracted production, which wasn't created by «scientists,» it was actually created by Environmental Media Services, a company which specializes in spreading environmental junk science on behalf of numerous clients who stand to financially benefit from scare tactics through environmental fear mongering.»

What most definitely is scandalous is the vile hypocrisy of Soon's harrassment by the warmist establishment, which receives billions every year from the US government, left - wing charities, and billionaire activists like Tom Steyer and George Soros to prop up their bankrupt cause by promoting exactly the kind of junk science which Soon (and similarly principled scientists) have made it their business to shred.

If you want to read more about this, I recommend not just my book, but also Matt Ridley's superb The Rational Optimist or anything by Julian Simon (known as the Doomslayer because of the way he constantly confounded Neo Malthusian pessimism and junk science).

You try what was seen in an award - winning essay suggestion from the 2008 «Roscoe Hogan Environmental Law Essay Contest,» that such testimony may be ignored because it is unreliable junk science funded by corporations that's irrelevant in the face of settled science.

Then there is the larger problem with essay writer Hackney's conclusions about «unreliable junk science funded by corporations»:

«The American public deserve [sic] an honest debate that isn't polluted by the best junk science fossil fuel interests can buy,» Markey said in a statement.

But, the «Original Sin» associated with the heterogeneous mess of the surface temperature record was perpetrated by James Hansen et el in the early 1980's when they decided to use the surface temperature record to prove and / or justify their «junk science» claims of CO2 causing Anthropogenic Global Warming / Climate Change.

Climate science is a mess and more of a junk science than a science now, exactly because of views held by people like Mosher.

It was just «junk science,» they claimed, a «scare tactic» worked up for selfish purposes by power - seeking bureaucrats and radical environmentalists.