Sentences with phrase «by labour arbitrators»

This is Canada's only comprehensive dictionary of collective agreement language as interpreted by labour arbitrators, organized as an easy - to - use reference guide.

I believe it is useful also to consider the approach taken by labour arbitrators in dealing with off — duty conduct.

This case concerned the interpretation of a collective agreement by a labour arbitrator.

Notable mandates: Successfully represented Nor - Man Regional Health Authority at the Supreme Court of Canada in a case dealing with the principle of estoppel by a labour arbitrator; represented an intervenor in another case at the country's top court: Moore v. British Columbia (Education); acted for the private - sector partner in a $ 35 - million P3 deal for claims processing; launched an online privacy compliance forum for privacy officers.

Not exact matches

The review process was assisted by Mr. Andrew Sims, Q.C., a labour arbitrator and a former Chair of the Alberta Labour Relations labour arbitrator and a former Chair of the Alberta Labour Relations Labour Relations Board.

The Supreme Court of Canada has been feverishly productive in the field of administrative law since the Fall of 2011, rendering decisions on standard of review (questions of law, jurisdictional error and labour arbitrators), the right to reasons, issue estoppel, attempts to pre-empt the administrative decision - making process, and review of municipal by - laws.

In a 2009 decision of the Ontario Labour Relations Board, cited with approval by Arbitrator Knopf, the Board held that:

I am aware (h / t Patrick Gingras) of one Canadian case, where a labour arbitrator was disqualified by the Federal Court because his FB pages showed social links to a minister who had appointed him and to another who was — via his department — a party before him.

The idea of ownership trumping privacy has long been rejected by most academic commentators and numerous labour arbitrators — courts may soon (with the help of legislators?)

The arbitrator's decision was upheld by the British Columbia Labour Relations Board.

At the time the doctrine of judicial deference was first developed by the Court in the late 1970s and 1980s, the courts in the labour relations area, in particular, had a poor record of interfering with the sensible development of labour relations policy by labour relations boards and arbitrators under collective bargaining statutes.

The Court concluded that labour arbitrators are bound by the requirements of the Personal Information Protection Act («PIPA»), but that they are not required to obtain consent from grievors or witnesses to disclose personal information about those individuals in arbitral awards.

The following represents a few notable decisions made by the Ontario Labour Relations Board, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario and arbitrators in 2013 that are relevant to school boards in Ontario.

However, it determined that an exception under s. 18 (1)(o) of PIPA applied to the requirement to obtain consent, as collection, use and disclosure without consent is «required or authorized by law» based on s. 96 of the Labour Relations Code, which requires arbitrators to file a copy of their awards with the director, who in turn is required by law to make the award «available for public inspection».

He is a member of the Ontario Labour Management Arbitrators Association and is governed by their Code of Ethics.

The parties can agree to an expedited process that mandates the appointment of an arbitrator from a roster by the Ministry of Labour.

Labour arbitrators are also not necessarily bound by rules of evidence common law, and have more discretion regarding violations of employee's privacy interests in collecting information.

On August 12th the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that British Columbia labour arbitrators are bound by British Columbia's provincial private sector privacy legislation but do not need consent to collect, use or disclose grievor and witness personal information.

Filling a long - felt need expressed by the labour arbitration community, the authors have selected leading cases from among the thousands of decisions issued over the years by arbitrators and the courts.

When arbitration was used mainly by sophisticated commercial entities (or in the labour field by unions and large companies) parties could choose qualified arbitrators based on personal knowledge and experience.