Sentences with phrase «by legacy publishers in»

As far as any objective quality of writing, editing, or finished product is concerned, I'd gladly pit my book against those in the same genre published by legacy publishers in the past few years.

Not exact matches

The Legacy Media Award, conferred by ACAM president Jeanne Drisco, MD, was accepted by Townsend Letter publisher and editor - in - chief Jonathan Collin, MD, with his wife, Deborah, daughter, Affinity, and son, Sam, joining him at the podium.

Are legacy publishers and professionals so threatened by self - published authors that this level of effort goes into picking apart an argument in favor of indie authors?

If one purchases a novel, whether in print or electronic form, and enjoys it, does it really matter if it was vetted and published by a legacy publishers or whether it was indie published?

According to Stark, the convenience and speed - to - market enabled by the tools Lulu provides for self - publishing make it possible for a small, savvy publisher like Shelf to «plant its flag in an industry niche that the small publisher has the flexibility and agility to exploit in a way that «legacy» publishers can't.»

How is the print / paper / binding quality of the Createspace books in comparison to the ones published by the legacy publishers?

The one - day conference will also feature Kaya Thomas, founder and developer of We Read Too, a book resource application that showcases a directory of hundreds of children's and young adult fiction books written by and for people of colour, alongside other sessions on keeping up with digital natives, sneaking in innovation at a legacy publisher, and much more.

And let's not forget the publisher who pulled an entire line of books after Fifty Shades of Grey took off (which, btw, was first self - published and is NOT well - written or edited, even after being picked up by a legacy publisher) to make sure all its covers told readers that these were books in the vein of FSOG?

This week's head - to - wall experience began by reading an article in one of our local papers about the trouble our libraries are having with legacy publishers over e-books.

In the «duh» department, we have the following quotes about e-book royalty rates paid by legacy publishers:

Yet, legacy publishers continue to shoot themselves in the foot by doing their best to keep a major outlet for e-books tied up and out of the hands of readers.

So I stand by my statements in the post in question, and in others, that e-books are more than a flash in the pan and deserve greater attention from legacy publishers.

I think we're in a period in which the legacy publishers are doing us a great favor by pricing ebooks too high.

It seems to me that any rational pricing strategy by smaller (and indie) publishers would snuggle in beneath legacy publisher prices.

I believe my sweet spot per - unit price (the per - unit price that, multiplied by volume, results in maximum revenues) is around five dollars, and legacy publishers won't price new digital titles that low (in fact, they went to war with Amazon over Amazon's $ 9.99 price point, which they judged too low).

But I do feel we are all missing on the benefits to be derived from the Big Five or small, respected legacy presses, if we don't realize that the legacy publishers offer something more than a contract and royalties: they offer a chance to be reviewed by independent professional critics in the mainstream media and to access all the prestigious prizes — and this should be also said loud and clear and I hope you dedicate a future post to this.