Sentences with phrase «by manmade warming»

The new analysis suggests no discernable decrease in the rate of warming between the second half of the 20th century, a period marked by manmade warming, and the first fifteen years of the 21st century, a period dubbed a global warming

Not exact matches

While a strong El Niño has given global temperatures a boost, the bulk of that heat comes from the manmade global warming driven by increasing amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

First, the hypothesis of manmade global warming is only supported by general circulation models, which are known to be imperfect representations of the Earth's climate systems.

The now conventional view on global warming, as stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is that most of the warming recorded in the past 50 years has been caused by emissions of manmade greenhouse gases.

In addition, according to the recent PNAS paper by Yangyang Xua and Veerabhadran Ramanathan, «Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes» (http://www.pnas.org/content/114/39/10315.full), manmade aerosols are currently «hiding» 0.9 C of warming.

This message merited designation as an «Extra,» and had the title «Carbon dioxide production by benthic bacteria: the death of manmade global warming theory?»

More than 650 scientists from around the world dispute the claims made by the United Nations and former Vice President Al Gore about global warming, saying that science does not support that climate change is a manmade phenomenon, according to a posting on the Senate environmental committee's press blog.

It deleted references to studies showing that global warming is caused by manmade emissions.

There were 3896 papers explicitly or implicitly endorsing the notion that we cause some warming, among which the 64 that were marked as endorsing the notion that more than half of post-1950 warming was manmade were hidden by lumping together the three «levels of endorsement» in a single number, and not revealing separately how many papers fell into each «level of endorsement».

The interesting extrapolation graph (hidden in the bottom left) shows 4 more degrees of warming and CO2 levels over 1000 ppm by 2100 if the manmade exponential use of carbon continues (which is pessimistic).

Concerning the recent warming believed to be caused by manmade CO2 emissions, in the scrutiny of my own I have found that the assessments of IPCC are totally wrong: on the basis of cutting of human CO2 emissions there is impossible to reach any working decision to control warming.

Is the dramatic decline of Arctic sea ice, spurred by manmade global warming, making the weather where we live more extreme?

One of the myriad incorrect assertions by climate - change deniers is that scientists who have proven manmade causes for the current global warming ignore periods of warming in the Earth's past that were not caused by industrial pollution.

The data indicate the sea surface temperatures of the tropical oceans warmed at a not - very - alarming rate of 0.11 deg C / decade, while the models indicate that, if the surfaces of the tropical oceans were warmed by manmade greenhouse gases, they should have warmed at almost 2 times that rate, at 0.22 deg C / decade.

And I'm not so sure that supporting dubious scientific claims about Global Warming, driven by (manmade) CO2 concentration is the best way for NASA to regain its lost credibility.

These glaciers are being eaten away from underneath due to warm ocean waters that have been driven toward the continent by shifting wind patterns that have in turn been linked to manmade global warming, as well as natural climate variability.

Contrary to the beliefs of anthropogenic warming proponents the 1997/98 El Nino was NOT fueled by a long - term accumulation of heat from manmade greenhouse gases.

Results from an irreducibly simple climate model,» concluded that, once discrepancies in IPCC computer models are taken into account, the impact of CO2 - driven manmade global warming over the next century (and beyond) is likely to be «no more than one - third to one - half of the IPCC's current projections» — that is, just 1 - 2 degrees C (2 - 4 deg F) by 2100!

From Stock & Land Australia — The sudden change of focus from global warming to global cooling by leading environment group World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) demonstrates the lack of substance to the argument that manmade carbon emissions are responsible for global warming, according to Senator Boswell.

It shall also be highlighted that warming rate is exactly the same over [1910 — 1940] and [1970 — 2000] periods, whereas consumption of fossil energy (i.e manmade CO2 emissions) has been multiplied by 5 in the meantime... which actually falsifies AGW theory.

The one thing about Dr. Meier's answers that interested me was this idea he has that regional warming can be natural and cyclical, but that if it is world wide than it has to be caused by manmade sources.

Australia — The sudden change of focus from global warming to global cooling by leading environment group World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) demonstrates the lack of substance to the argument that manmade carbon emissions are responsible for global warming, according to Senator Boswell.

«Manmade Global Warming» is a collection of ideas that have been thoroughly discredited by real science for years.

But by late September, several puzzling events left us wondering whether the AGU truly serves science and environmental scientists — or simply reflects, protects and advances the political agendas of those who espouse belief in manmade CO2 - induced catastrophic global warming.

Both the Guardian and the Independent have much longer reports by their science correspondents on a new report from the University of East Anglia: «Climate change at the poles IS man - made» (Independent) and «Manmade global warming evident on every continent, polar report finds» (Guardian).

1) The hypothesis of manmade global warming by CO2 does not have a single piece of defendable science behind it.

we then had a little ice age, we had a middle age warming - the climate's been going up and down - but the real question which I think everyone's trying to address is - is this influenced by manmade activity in recent years and James is actually correct - the climate has not changed - the temperature has not changed in the last seventeen years

A reaction from Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute to New York Times reporter Justin Gillis's attempts to discredit scientists who are skeptical of the theory of manmade global warming By NewsBusters Staff Justin Gillis of the New York Times has written a long article that criticizes Dick Lindzen of MIT by quoting several scientists who -LSB-..By NewsBusters Staff Justin Gillis of the New York Times has written a long article that criticizes Dick Lindzen of MIT by quoting several scientists who -LSB-..by quoting several scientists who -LSB-...]

«Well I'm sitting like a rose between two thorns here and I have to take practical decisions - erm - the climate's always been changing - er - Peter mentioned the Arctic and I think in the Holocene the Arctic melted completely and you can see there were beaches there - when Greenland was occupied, you know, people growing crops - we then had a little ice age, we had a middle age warming - the climate's been going up and down - but the real question which I think everyone's trying to address is - is this influenced by manmade activity in recent years and James is actually correct - the climate has not changed - the temperature has not changed in the last seventeen years and what I think we've got to be careful of is that there is almost certainly - bound to be - some influence by manmade activity but I think we've just got to be rational (audience laughter)- rational people - and make sure the measures that we take to counter it don't actually cause more damage - and I think we're about to get -»

'' * The Climate Change Emails Review headed by Sir Muir Russell included several vocal supporters of the manmade global warming hypothesis.

Nowadays only the sea surface warming expressed by Endersbee seems to make higher portions of manmade CO2 in atmosphere possible, as the warming of the as sinks acting sea surfaces at the higher latitudes makes absorption of CO2 from the atmosphere become slower.

Princeton physicist Will Happer has drawn the larger lesson: the ardent belief in manmade global warming upheld by our educated elite resembles the view of witchcraft upheld by the educated elite in colonial New England.

The first line sounds more like a letter to Penthouse than a scientific paper (you know, the classic «I never thought something like this would happen to me, but last Saturday night...) What caused me to delete the email (fortunately it was still in the trash so I could go back and find these quotes) was the line «findings in this paper could nt be more damaging to manmade global warming theory or the the thousands of climate scientists...» No academic in his right mind would state his / her conclusions in this manner, and even if they did, not editor or advisor would let it slip by.

Back when they had a hockey stick and could claim that TSI variation was being overwhelmed by other forcings, they could ignore the 1920's to 1940's warming and attribute the warming of the 80's and 90's to manmade causes.