This data is necessary to be able to respond effectively to contamination
by microplastics and the risk they pose to terrestrial ecosystems — where, after all, most plastic waste that enters the environment accumulates.
Not exact matches
Microplastic contamination may also spread from organism to organism when prey is eaten
by predators.
This means they could spread
microplastic pollution throughout the marine ecosystem,
by carrying
microplastics from the surface down to deeper waters, affecting deep - sea organisms.
«The high ingestion rate of
microplastics by mesopelagic fish that we observed has important consequences for the health of marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling in general.»
Although as much as 80 % of this marine plastic is emitted
by rivers to the oceans, not a single great river has yet been scientifically studied for the
microplastics load over its length.
By comparing the amount of
microplastics with historical measurements of the GPGP, the team found that plastic pollution levels within the GPGP have been growing exponentially since measurements began in the 1970s.
However, central surface waters of the oceans may not be the final destination of plastic debris since, as indicated
by the study performed
by the Malaspina Expedition, large amounts of
microplastics could be passing to the marine food chain and the ocean floor.
On 7 December, Uppsala University in Sweden released a long - awaited report
by its Board for Investigation of Misconduct in Research, which investigated a high - profile paper about the effects of
microplastics on fish, published in Science in June 2016.
A separate report, from Mark Anthony Browne on work performed at Plymouth University, shows that ingesting
microplastic can also reduce the health of lugworms
by delivering harmful chemicals, including hydrocarbons, antimicrobials, and flame retardants, to them.
Work
by Stephanie Wright from the University of Exeter found that if ocean sediments are heavily contaminated with
microplastics, marine lugworms eat less and their energy levels suffer.
Nizzetto et al (2016): «A theoretical assessment of
microplastic transport in river catchments and their retention
by soils and river sediments» in Environ.
At least one recent study, authored
by one of Thompson's former graduate students and colleagues, including Thompson, showed that a type of filter feeder called a lugworm was adversely affected when exposed to sand that had
microplastics that contained common chemical pollutants.
The majority of the debris comprises
microplastics that are created
by the process of photodegradation (in the ocean, the sun breaks down the plastics into ever smaller pieces).
A new report
by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) examines the source of these primary
microplastics.
Microplastics create an estimated $ 13 billion a year in losses from damage to marine ecosystems (not to mention the severe degradation to natural capital suffered
by animals and their habitats), as well as financial losses to fisheries and tourism.
«These
microplastics absorb pollutants, are eaten
by organisms, and enter the food chain, potentially affecting human health.»
These include
microplastics, which impose severe degradation to natural capital suffered
by animals and their habitats.
Emphasizes that further urgent action is needed to address the challenges posed
by marine plastic debris and
microplastics,
by addressing such materials at source,
by reducing pollution through improved waste management practices and
by cleaning up existing debris and litter;
Welcomes the initiative
by the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection to produce an assessment report on
microplastics, which is scheduled to be launched in November 2014; 13.
Also recognizes the need for more knowledge and research on the source and fate of
microplastics and their impact on biodiversity, marine ecosystems and human health, noting recent knowledge that such particles can be ingested
by biota and could be transferred to higher levels in the marine food chain, causing adverse effects; 6.
«This accumulations of
microplastics is being ingested
by the largest of the filter feeders right down to the smaller organisims, the microorganisms at the bottom of the food chain.»
Those pieces of plastic in our local waterways break down into
microplastics which can then be eaten or swallowed
by sea life and fish.
Even the UN Environment Program has taken a strong stance against plastic pollution, and started a global campaign to reduce marine debris from
microplastics and single use plastics
by 2022.
The goal is to eliminate major sources of pollution, including
microplastics in cosmetics and single - use disposable plastics,
by pressuring governments and individuals to rethink the way goods are packaged and their own shopping habits.
These include
microplastics, which result in an estimated $ 13 billion a year in losses from damage to marine ecosystems (not to mention the severe degradation to natural capital suffered
by animals and their habitats) and financial losses to fisheries and tourism.
A new study conducted
by researchers at the State University of New York Fredonia has found that brands of sea salt sold in China contain high amounts of
microplastics.
Microplastics in the ocean are being consumed
by corals in the Great Barrier Reef, but what impact could this pollution have on marine ecosystems?
Latest study conducted
by Plymouth University researchers has found that everyday cosmetic products, such as facial soaps, toothpastes and exfoliants, contain around 100,000
microplastic particles that often end up as pollutants in oceans and rivers.