One final conclusion may come as no surprise — the researchers say their findings show that our day - to - day moral decisions don't fit into the neat categories defined
by moral philosophers.
Each is actually shorthand for a framework developed
by moral philosophers over the centuries.
The sheer length and complexity of great novels, their patient playing out of the consequences of our moral choices, make them infinitely more useful than the brief schematic narratives that are commonly employed
by moral philosophers to illustrate their claims.
«Quoting from an argument advanced
by moral philosopher Peter Singer, for instance, [Gates] questions why anyone would donate money to build a new wing for a museum rather than spend it on preventing illnesses that can lead to blindness.
Not exact matches
An argument forwarded
by Australian
moral philosopher Peter Singer was wrongly attritubted to hedge fund manager Paul Singer.
The political
philosophers Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson reject not only Tutu's invocation of religion and charged that,
by seeking to transform the attitudes, emotions, and
moral judgments of citizens, he improperly imports soulcraft into statecraft and transgresses the autonomy of citizens — contemporary liberalism's most sacrosanct value.
Contrary to the stereotype promulgated
by socialists, Smith was first and foremost a
moral philosopher.
As is observed
by J. Baird Callicott, a contemporary environmental
philosopher and defender of Leopold, what is noteworthy about this principle «is that the good of the biotic community is the ultimate measure of the
moral value, the rightness or wrongness, of actions» (AL 318).
If the
moral philosophers, theologians, and others are right, however, our society is equally united and defined
by the story we collectively tell and live.
A temporary condition of this sort, connected with the religious evolution of a singularly lofty character, both intellectual and
moral, is well described
by the Catholic
philosopher, Father Gratry, in his autobiographical recollections.
One of the searching interpretations of atonement in the twentieth century was given
by the
philosopher Josiah Royce in The Problem of Christianity.8 Royce's philosophic idealism was built upon the tragic aspect of life and what he called the «
moral burden of the individual».
There is in most of us a spark of reason, and much was achieved for universal human
moral standing
by the great Stoic
philosophers who emphasized this logos in us all.
In Living Faithfully in a Fragmented World: Lessons for the Church from MacIntyre's «After Virtue» (1998), Wilson responds to
moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, who concludes his celebrated 1991 critique of modernity
by calling for «the construction of local forms of community within which civility and the intellectual and
moral life can be sustained through the new dark ages which are already upon us....
That's one of the most fundamental differences, I think, between a deeply conservative position and a strictly libertarian one: conservatives think that for all its merits, the right we have to choose in the marketplace needs to be shaped
by virtue and ordered
by a
moral order (I never tire of pointing out that Adam Smith thought himself a
moral philosopher).
These
philosophers also believed that people were basically virtuous; they supposed that improved standards of living, and habits rationally modified
by knowledge, would lead to gradually rising
moral standards in society.
The Catholic
philosopher Alice von Hildebrand suggests that «when piety dies out in women, society is threatened in its very fabric; for a woman's relationship to the sacred keeps the Church and society on an even keel, and when this link is severed, both are threatened
by total
moral chaos.»
Why, we would not be at all surprised if even some of those «serious
moral philosophers» think in ways shaped
by considerations that TNR might deem «religious.»
Although the complex
moral ability called courage, highly honored
by the ancients and ignored
by most non-existentialist modern
philosophers, is not directly named
by Whitehead, it is directly implicated throughout his works in discussions of tragedy and heroism.
The mythical figure Philosophia - Sapientia, the personification of wisdom, suckled
philosophers at her breast and
by this way they absorbed wisdom and
moral virtue.
Specifically referred to
by the Court was evidence given
by BHA Vice President and
moral philosopher Simon Blackburn, who had said, «True respect for life means respect for the persons whose lives are in question - refusing assistance, when their plea is settled and uncoerced discounts and demeans their personhood.
By the way, Smith - the - rhetorician never disappeared when Smith - the -
moral -
philosopher and Smith - the - economist came to the fore.
Although the terms political philosophy and political theory are used rather indiscriminately, those who think of themselves as political
philosophers tend to link what they do closely to philosophical and
moral principles; while those who call themselves political theorists tend to appeal to facts about the world and to the way in which the structures and processes of social and political life limit the possibilities for the realisation of those principles
by political agency.
I, of course,
by trade am a
moral philosopher; I only got into psychology accidentally.
Most modern theories of
moral reasoning, he learned, were powerfully shaped
by one of two great
philosophers: Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill.
You can be a brilliant
moral philosopher with a prizewinning doctoral thesis expounding the evils of war, and still be given a hard time
by a draft board evaluating your claim to be a conscientious objector.
Darwin's theory of natural selection was extended to society and
morals not
by Darwin himself but
by the English
philosopher Herbert Spencer, father of «the Law of Equal Freedom,» which holds that «every man is free to do that which he wills,» provided it doesn't infringe on the equal freedom of others.
Derek Parfit was «thought
by many to be the most original
moral philosopher in the English - speaking world» (The New Yorker).
There, well - known
philosopher Dr. Henry Shue (currently at Oxford) gave an excellent and compelling talk about the (strong)
moral / ethical case for taking action to address and minimize risks such as those presented
by climate change.
People (the public, the media, and so forth) naturally wonder, if only 1 percent of all ethicists, spiritual leaders,
moral philosophers, other
philosophers, «wise women and men», and so forth are speaking out in ethical /
moral terms, then those ethical /
moral arguments must truly be «not all that important», or «highly controversial and not broadly accepted», or «only held
by theoretical folks», or whatever.