The project of income integration assumes that attending school with mostly poor classmates depresses achievement, and that being surrounded
by more affluent students enhances it.
Not exact matches
Because the local property tax base is typically higher in areas with higher home values, and there are persistently high levels of residential segregation
by socioeconomic status, heavy reliance on local financing contributed to
affluent districts» ability to spend
more per
student.
Because the local property tax base is typically higher in areas with higher home values, and there are persistently high levels of residential segregation
by socioeconomic status, heavy reliance on local financing enabled
affluent districts to spend
more per
student.
«Plaintiffs still could have demonstrated a facial equal protection violation, however,
by showing that the challenged statutes, regardless of how they are implemented, inevitably cause poor and minority
students to be provided with an education that is not «basically equivalent to» their
more affluent and / or white peers.»
A significant body of literature also points to differences in access to reading materials
by students from low - income families in comparison to their
more affluent peers (Allington & McGill - Franzen, 2008).
In the NCLB era, schools could narrow the proficiency gap
by helping
students reach a relatively low bar, even if
more affluent students were achieving well over that bar.
Unlike No Child Left Behind, which had the goal of all
students being proficient
by 2014 (less than 14 months away), D.C. officials are implementing new, lower standards of academic performance for African American, Latino, and poor children compared to their
more affluent White and Asian counterparts.
By providing resources to schools without factoring in the role of outside dollars, Washington allows the most
affluent students and their schools to receive
more money than the
students and schools who have the highest need.
In fact, according to an analysis
by Urban Institute,
students in Colorado's poorest districts receive only an additional $ 401 per
student relative to
more affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years even as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across society.
A recent study of urban, suburban, and rural schools in four states found that smaller schools helped close the achievement gap — as measured
by test scores — between
students from poor communities and
students from
more affluent ones.
After the state made these changes, low - income
students were
more likely to be taught
by teachers whose academic abilities matched those of teachers in
more affluent schools.116
On the institutional side, they note that schools dominated
by affluent students have
more elaborate and better - kept facilities, better - educated and effective teachers, less teacher turnover,
more capable principals, and a richer variety of academically demanding courses and extracurricular offerings.
This makes the new goal set
by the major charter school networks, to grade themselves on the percentage of their
students who go on to earn four - year college degrees in six years, all the
more radical — especially given the fact that these networks educate low - income, minority
students, whose college graduation rates pale in comparison to their
more affluent white peers — a mere 9 percent earning degrees within six years, compared with 77 percent of
students from high - income families as of 2015.
The report also made mention of the
more rigorous Common Core State Standards, which both Education Post and Education Reform Now support, and the opt - out movement that has largely been dominated
by affluent white
students.
Research shows that teachers of color help close achievement gaps for
students of color and are highly rated
by students of all races — a fact that is all the
more relevant in light of persistent gaps between
students of color and
students from low income families and their peers who are White or from
more affluent families.
Moreover, the process for identifying «failing schools» was neither consistent nor research - based, and disproportionately affected low - income African American and Latino
students by closing schools in disadvantaged minority neighborhoods while leaving untouched those schools in
more affluent areas with comparable performance and enrollments.
These seasonal setbacks add up — low - income
students may be up to three years behind their
more affluent peers
by fifth grade.
For some of your
students, field trips provide the only opportunity they have to experience the world outside their neighborhood, and provide an opportunity to develop the kind of cultural capital enjoyed
by their
more affluent peers.
While Soulsville tries to strike the right balance of reading and math with music courses for its predominantly black and lower - income population, nationally,
students from low - income families and minority groups are significantly
more likely to go without music classes than their
more affluent peers, according to data collected
by the Arts Education Partnership at the Council of Chief State School Officers, said Scott Jones, a senior associate with the group.
When children enter kindergarten, half of the achievement gap between low - income
students and their
more affluent peers that exists in high school is already present.22 The federal government can address the developmental needs of young children through child care reform
by implementing policies that improve quality starting at birth and continuing up to age 13.