Developed
by natural selection on Madagascar, the «cottony texture» of the white coat, rectangular silhouette and convex topline defines the breed.
Not exact matches
The theory of evolution
by natural selection is a beautiful explanation for the diversity of life based
on observable facts.
Educate yourself
on what evolution
by natural selection actually says before you attempt to comment
on it.
Bingham is
on target in arguing that culture constitutes the fast track of evolutionary development — a track governed
by basic evolutionary dynamics, including the «nature bats last» factor of
natural selection.
On a purely secular view, humans are simply the accidental
by - products of
natural selection, monkeys who
by chance grew brains too big for their own good.
It is no longer simply a matter of cells organized
by the hazards of
natural selection, but of completed zoological units inventively building themselves into organisms
on a planetary scale.
If,
on the other hand, we define evolution in the Darwinian sense — as a process of random mutation and
natural selection by which all living beings have arisen
by chance from single - celled organisms over 100's of millions of years — we may not be
on equally firm ground from a scientific perspective.
It is essentially the full ti.tle of Charles Darwin's seminal work: «
On the Origin of Species
by Means of
Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life».
Baden Powell accepted biological evolution enthusiastically, writing, «a work has now appeared
by a naturalist of the most acknowledged authority, Mr. Darwin's masterly volume
on the Origin of Species
by the law of «
natural selection», which now substantiates
on undeniable grounds the very principle so long denounced
by the first naturalists....
As for the Eye — Creationists only ever refer to the rhetorical portion of Darwin's statement in which he said «to suppose that the eye... could have been formed
by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree» — but they never point out that he then went
on to describe the evolutionary path of the eye — a theory which over a hundred years of careful research has confirmed.
I marveled at a chart that showed a diagram of the tree of life, where relationships between different mammalian species were figured out solely
by comparison of their DNA sequences, providing powerful support for Darwin's idea of descent from a common ancestor with
natural selection operating
on randomly occurring variations.
Modernism developed
on the basis of the Newtonian universe, conceived as a complex inanimate machine, operating in absolute space and absolute time according to its own internal laws, which were also believed to be eternal and absolute.4 Understanding this «
natural world» was the key to everything; physicists set about uncovering the laws
by which the physical world operates; Adam Smith looked for the
natural laws
by which the economy operates; Darwin thought he had discovered, in the law of
natural selection, the origin of species.
Asuka responded to that and a
Natural Selection by putting a modified octopus hold
on Charlotte, and hoo man is that painful looking and also likely painful, just maybe!
Famous for: His 5 year around the world trip where he visited the Galapagos Islands and based his evidence found
on his theory of evolution
by natural selection
Combing the genetic data from a transmission study in ferrets, a team led
by Thomas Friedrich, a professor of pathobiological sciences at the University of Wisconsin - Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, found that during transmission, when one animal is infected
by another through sneezing or coughing, the process of
natural selection acts strongly
on hemagglutinin, the structure the virus uses to attach to and infect host cells.
They think
natural selection may have put pressure
on weaker fliers to lose their teeth in a bid to improve their skills
by losing excess weight.
Using statistical models to home in
on genetic mutations that spread quickly throughout populations, Pritchard and his colleagues have identified hundreds of regions of the genome that have recently been transformed
by natural selection.
More recently, a report
by Kevin N. Laland of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland and his colleagues in Nature Reviews Genetics, building
on an earlier proposal
by Robert Boyd of the University of California, Los Angeles, and Peter J. Richerson of U.C. Davis, argued that human culture, defined as any learned behavior, including technology, has been the dominant
natural selection force
on modern humans.
The new study «adds fuel to an active debate» about the role of accessory genes, says Alan McNally, a microbiologist at the University of Birmingham in England — whether or not the collections of genetic add -
ons that bacteria maintain are shaped
by natural selection, the process that fuels evolution.
Antibiotic resistance evolves naturally via
natural selection through random mutation, but it could also be engineered
by applying an evolutionary stress
on a population.
But the neat concept of adaptation to the environment driven
by natural selection, as envisaged
by Darwin in
On the Origin of Species and now a central feature of the theory of evolution, is too simplistic.
Building
on this idea, some of his colleagues argued that language is an adaptation shaped
by natural selection, just like eyes and wings.
On July 2, 1866, Alfred Russel Wallace, the co-discoverer of natural selection, wrote to Charles Darwin to lament how he had been «so repeatedly struck by the utter inability of numbers of intelligent persons to see clearly or at all, the self acting & necessary effects of Nat Selection, that I am led to conclude that the term itself & your mode of illustrating it, however clear & beautiful to many of us are yet not the best adapted to impress it on the general naturalist public.&raqu
On July 2, 1866, Alfred Russel Wallace, the co-discoverer of
natural selection, wrote to Charles Darwin to lament how he had been «so repeatedly struck by the utter inability of numbers of intelligent persons to see clearly or at all, the self acting & necessary effects of Nat Selection, that I am led to conclude that the term itself & your mode of illustrating it, however clear & beautiful to many of us are yet not the best adapted to impress it on the general naturalist publi
selection, wrote to Charles Darwin to lament how he had been «so repeatedly struck
by the utter inability of numbers of intelligent persons to see clearly or at all, the self acting & necessary effects of Nat
Selection, that I am led to conclude that the term itself & your mode of illustrating it, however clear & beautiful to many of us are yet not the best adapted to impress it on the general naturalist publi
Selection, that I am led to conclude that the term itself & your mode of illustrating it, however clear & beautiful to many of us are yet not the best adapted to impress it
on the general naturalist public.&raqu
on the general naturalist public.»
• Extra: For an even greater understanding of evolution
by natural selection, repeat this experiment
on a different colored surface (try using fabric or paper) and see if the population changes in a different way.
If correct, these changes could alter the course of evolution
by giving
natural selection new targets to act
on.
I guess
natural selection just selected for those that somehow get excited when females pass
by, says Wikelski, It gives a signal to the brain that something's going
on, makes the animal really excited and leads to pre-ejaculation.
Matthew Stevens, a «non-religionist», adds to the now trendy practice of bashing atheist Richard Dawkins
by saying that religion, «has evolved
by natural selection because of the benefits it confers
on its practitioners» (8 February, p 31).
Roth, whose research is focused
on understanding the processes
by which
natural selection influences the use of space in animals, is taking the lead
on studying the chickadees» neuroanatomy.
Twenty years later his
On the Origin of Species
by Means of
Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life would have monocles plopping into soup all across the Victorian world and would forever answer the deepest question of all, Why Are We Here?
The iconic myth is that Darwin became an evolutionist in the Galpagos when he discovered
natural selection operating
on finch beaks and tortoise carapaces, each species uniquely adapted
by food type or island ecology.
Our results show that male competition is a key driver of speciation —
by a factor that is five times greater than results
on which other, more - traditional theories of
natural selection causing speciation are based.»
A decade ago, the lead author
on the new study, Masato Yoshizawa, wanted to understand brain evolution
by investigating the effects of
natural selection on behavior.
During his travels
on the Beagle, Darwin noticed subtle anatomical differences between giant tortoises living
on different islands in the archipelago, which would later inform his theory of evolution
by natural selection.
But if you strip away all the paraphernalia then really what culture is about at its core is about innovations that are not encoded in the genome somehow and are passed
on, not
by genetic transmission, and are not sort of shaped
by natural selection, which is the normal stuff of evolution; but it is transmitted socially through social learning.
At one point, he explained that so many more babies survive childbirth now that
natural selection, as proposed
by Charles Darwin, can not act
on humans to favor infants with traits that are beneficial today or to weed out those with adaptations that impair survival.
Even more interesting is that
natural selection by these parasitic wasps
on gall form is ongoing and still very strong, providing both a window into past processes of diversification and a divination of future adaptive diversification in this gall midge lineage.
She was followed
by Elinor Karlsson (University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA) who gave an overview
on natural selection stating that evolution can be thought of as «the most epic genetic engineering experiment ever».
My understanding of the established darwinian evolution
by natural selection is that for an adaptation to occur, the fitness of individuals (i.e. the ability to pass
on their genes to offspring) must be changed.
But even those who loathe Herbert Spencer and his theories
on natural selection should question these characters and their motivations, whether motivated
by guilt or a sort of perverse white supremacist ignorance.
Depending
on its
selection, the calibration of the engine control unit changes with a reduction of torque
by 35 Nm (from 145 in Dynamic mode to 110 Nm in
Natural mode).
In reality, hunter - gatherers were unbelievably skilled (a point also made
by Jared Diamond in his classic Guns, Germs and Steel, in which, if I recollect correctly, he makes a compelling case that as a result of
natural selection and their environment, the indigenous people of Papua New Guinea are,
on average, more intelligent than so called «first world *» inhabitants).
Darwin's theory of
natural selection was extended to society and morals not
by Darwin himself but
by the English philosopher Herbert Spencer, father of «the Law of Equal Freedom,» which holds that «every man is free to do that which he wills,» provided it doesn't infringe
on the equal freedom of others.
There is something even more peculiar about our species than all these things, and that is this: we are the only species
on the planet that can not be fully explained
by Charles Darwin's otherwise faultless theory of evolution
by natural selection.
Darwin conducted almost 30 years of research and he published
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life on this day in 185
On the Origin of Species
by Means of
Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
on this day in 185
on this day in 1859.
My hunch is that Darwin's
natural selection, powered
by reader preferences, will prevent serialized ebooks from catching
on.
I'm not exactly sure how my opinion
on this subject relates to Orthodoxy, but my understanding is this in relation to canines: the domestic dog is not the product of
natural selection, but selective breeding
by man.
Best known for their unique wildlife (and as the inspiration for Charles Darwin's groundbreaking research
on natural selection and evolution), the Galápagos Islands are a protected area governed
by strict rules and regulations meant to protect the delicate ecosystem.
Island dwarfism is thought to result from intense
natural selection caused
by evolutionary pressures of living
on islands (e.g., increased competition for limited resources)[43].
Sir Alfred Russel Wallace, the so - called father of animal geography, formulated his ideas
on evolution
by natural selection while observing and collecting wildlife in the islands of Southeast Asia.
Darwin's notes
on the Galapagos helped him develop the theory of evolution
by natural selection, as he noted the different finches inhabiting the islands had adapted to suit the island's particular food available.