Sir Alfred Russel Wallace, the so - called father of animal geography, formulated his ideas on evolution
by natural selection while observing and collecting wildlife in the islands of Southeast Asia.
Comparing the two types of mutations allowed the team to spot genes that have had changes favoured
by natural selection while taking into account the background mutation rate.
Not exact matches
Most importantly,
while I do agree that common descent is supported
by the bulk of the evidence (although admittedly there are difficulties at higher phylogenetic levels), I certainly do not think we have any reason to suppose the process occurred
by random mutation and
natural selection, the position Prof. Arnhart attributes to me.
And
while mankind has somewhat removed ourselves from
natural selection by tailoring our environments, morality continues to «evolve».
While the evolutionary biologist might agree that no purpose can be discerned in the physical universe prior to the state at which evolution in the biological sense commenced (that is to say, where entities which are born, reproduce and die and in so doing are subject to
natural selection), yet he might argue that evolution
by natural selection automatically provides the «purpose.»
Design equations are used to create mutations,
while members of the public provide
natural selection by deciding the «fitness» of these ideas.
Examining substantial collections of annotated texts dating from the 12th to the 21st centuries, the researchers found that certain linguistic changes were guided
by pressures analogous to
natural selection — social, cognitive and other factors —
while others seem to have occurred purely
by happenstance.
While revolutionary new ideas such as evolution
by natural selection, or quantum physics, are once - in - a-generation occurrences, the sands of science are continually shifting in less dramatic ways.
Researchers Michael Tobler, associate professor of biology, and Zach Culumber, former university postdoctoral research associate and current postdoctoral researcher at Florida State University, studied 112 species of live - bearing fish and found that males and females evolve differently: Female evolution is influenced more strongly
by natural selection and the environment,
while male evolution is influenced more strongly
by sexual
selection, which involves characteristics that females find desirable or that make them superior competitors for females.