Not exact matches
I do not understand why people wish to diminish the wonder
of nature and the immense statistical improbability
of our
existence by giving credit to a powerful imaginary friend.
in particular, it does so
by speaking
of the
nature of your relationship to the Author
of Existence.
(the way someone thinks about the world) Do you no view people
of the world with Inherent
existence;
existence possessed
by virtue
of a being's own
nature, and independent
of any other being or cause?
Welcome to the official website
of the Church
of Satan (Church
of Satan dot com) Founded on April 30, 1966 c.e.
by Anton Szandor LaVey, we are the first above - ground organization in history openly dedicated to the acceptance
of Man's true
nature — that
of a carnal beast, living in a cosmos that is indifferent to our
existence.
This view may be argued for in various ways: — first:
by appeal to logical laws and metaphysical necessities; — second:
by appeal to the
existence and
nature of God; — third:
by appeal to causal determinism (Causal determinism is the idea that every event is necessitated
by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws
of nature)
All are dislocated
by the very
nature of human
existence which necessitates one's being a wayfarer.
Either this criminal is mentally stronger than most you as just
by mere one sentence that God made him do so he has turned you guys into questioning and arguing about the
existence of God, Religion and Faith... For a change, what about discussing the
nature of his crime and a just punishment for him???... you bunch
of Sherlock Holmes
The emphasis has characteristically been on «a theology
of the infinite» — an inquiry into the identity and
existence of divine beings, divine activity in history and
nature, the purpose and destiny
of human life as these are revealed
by a being called «God» to others called «persons.»
Gratitude to God requires that we live not
by evading the real
nature of existence, not
by denying the violent character
of nature and history, but
by facing reality as best we can, finally affirming the whole
of life in all its sorrow and pain as a great gift.
But it would be further enriched
by the theology
of liberation and
by those who emphasize the holistic
nature of human
existence.
The artist, who dedicates himself to beauty, «teaches us that man can not be explained
by history alone and that he also finds a reason for his
existence in the order
of nature.
He will not require not merely that the new knowledge be used as the foundation
of the proof, but that the very spirit and atmosphere
of the new knowledge enter in such a way into thedemonstration
of God's
existence, that the complexities and confusions
of human thought engendered
by the new knowledge shall be resolved in harmonious unity in the postulate
of God's
existence,
nature, and relation to created being.
Most
of the Anglo - Catholic clergy who stayed in their ghetto did so because
of their refusal to leave their people behind: asone Anglican priest who had attempted to take his Parish to Rome and had been repulsed
by his local Catholic bishop put it to me, the essential was that «Rome has got to have a more creative view
of the corporate
nature of our present
existence».
The religious objections have mostly aimed to protect God's sovereign freedom to do what He pleases with his creation, a freedom which, the dissenters argue, would be limited
by the
existence of universal and unbreakable laws
of nature, or indeed
of inevitable laws
of history or human behaviour.
The Primary Purpose
of Sex and Marriage: Procreation Holloway's rooting
of the purpose
of sex in the Incarnation is a unique argument in favour
of the conclusion articulated
by the tradition and
by many contemporary orthodox Catholic scholars, namely, that the «primary reason for the
existence of sex in human
nature in the intention
of God is for children».
The distance between the moral principles which the Church proclaims and — leaving aside for the moment the question
of the Church's pastoral office — which alone can be propounded doctrinally, and the concrete prescriptions
by which the individual and the various human communities freely shape their
existence, has now increased to an extent that introduces what is practically a difference
of nature as compared with earlier times.
Certainly, similar to secular society the Church, too, rests on certain presuppositions which are not produced
by the free decision
of her members and their free association as such, but are the very conditions
of her
existence, namely human
nature, the saving will
of God, redemption through Jesus Christ, the general call
of all men to the Church and the resulting «duty» to belong to her.
Bultmann has said that philosophical reflection alone can discover and describe the
nature of authentic, i.e., Christian
existence: «Philosophy all
by itself already sees what the New Testament says.
Thomas Aquinas accepted a similar claim that reason unaided
by faith could move from a consideration
of causes and effects in
nature to a consideration
of the
existence of an unnamed First Cause or Unmoved Mover.
It does this
by highlighting the peculiar
nature of God's mode
of existence.
Since the voluntary
nature of love necessitates the
existence of a will
by which it can become activated, love is always personal.
Minute
by minute, the
existence of Israel mocks the pagan gods, the divine beings who rise out
of the consciousness
of all peoples but which are gentile gods because they are deifications
of humanity and the forces
of nature rather than the true, living God
of Abraham.
By calling his own brand of naturalism «integral,» Artigas wishes to convey the notion that nature as understood by the natural sciences points beyond itself to a larger reality to which the natural owes its existence, a reality to which the methods of the natural sciences do not of themselves, however, give direct acces
By calling his own brand
of naturalism «integral,» Artigas wishes to convey the notion that
nature as understood
by the natural sciences points beyond itself to a larger reality to which the natural owes its existence, a reality to which the methods of the natural sciences do not of themselves, however, give direct acces
by the natural sciences points beyond itself to a larger reality to which the natural owes its
existence, a reality to which the methods
of the natural sciences do not
of themselves, however, give direct access.
By «God» I mean the pervasive personal presence, distinct from me and prior to me, who is the source and support of my existence; who through Scripture makes me realize that he has towards me the nature and name of love - holy, lordly, costly, fatherly, redeeming love; who addresses me, really though indirectly, in all that Scripture shows of his relationship to human beings in history, and especially in the recorded utterances of his Son, Jesus Christ; and who is daily drawing me towards a face - to - face encounter and consummated communion with him beyond this life, by virtue of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (Ro
By «God» I mean the pervasive personal presence, distinct from me and prior to me, who is the source and support
of my
existence; who through Scripture makes me realize that he has towards me the
nature and name
of love - holy, lordly, costly, fatherly, redeeming love; who addresses me, really though indirectly, in all that Scripture shows
of his relationship to human beings in history, and especially in the recorded utterances
of his Son, Jesus Christ; and who is daily drawing me towards a face - to - face encounter and consummated communion with him beyond this life,
by virtue of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (Ro
by virtue
of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (Rom.
of course... but what you mean
by that is something radically different — IF you are consistent with what you are claiming is the ACTUAL
nature of existence.
Awe
by itself does not tell the scriptural story — as Pascal added, «It is a remarkable thing that no canonical author ever used
nature to prove the
existence of God» 6 — but it provides a compass that orients us toward God as creator.
In recent years numerous attempts have been made to solve the ancient problem
of evil
by way
of a Given within the
nature of God, the assertion
of «the demonic» in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement
of the
existence of a personal devil.
And for a society at large, religion legitimates institutionalized life
by relating its
existence to the «
nature of things,» to the gods.
Initially impressed
by the current consensus as to the kerygmatic
nature of the Gospels (7), Stauffer bases the possibility
of a positivistic quest upon the
existence of new sources (8).
The forces
of nature on which our
existence wholly depends are made less mysterious and more pliable
by our perceiving them as personal beings like ourselves.
Any universe created
by the multiverse generator would need to include both (a) the positive conditions necessary for life (i.e., the fine - tuned laws
of nature) and (b) the negative conditions necessary for human
existence (i.e., the absence
of V - class objects).
One
of the «four factors which decisively govern the fate
of social groups» according to his analysis, is «the iron compulsion
of nature that the bodily necessities
of food, clothing and shelter be provided».20 Whitehead continues: «The rigid limits which are thereby set to modes
of social
existence can only be mitigated
by the growth
of an understanding
by which the interplay between man and the rest
of nature can be adjusted.»
It is in coming to terms with the death
of Jesus that we find an answer to our search for meaning, in face
of the complex
nature of finite
existence and the problems raised
by evil, suffering and death.
It may be insight into the divine mysteries, the
nature of Ultimate Reality, and
of the laws governing the
existence of the cosmos,
of society, and
of individual lives; or the gift
of restoring into wholeness broken physical or spiritual health; or the ability to develop,
by teaching and in other ways, the hidden possibilities in one's fellow men, and to give direction and purpose to their lives.
By failing to see the place
of mind in
nature as well as
nature in mind, modern philosophy has been unable to put forth an adequate account
of the relation between the two, one which would assign to each its due importance as a constitutive element in our experience and in
existence as such.
Naturalistic evolution is consistent with the
existence of «God» only if
by that term we mean no more than a first cause which retires from further activity after establishing the laws
of nature and setting the natural mechanism in motion.
By postulating the existence of two natures in this one person, the Doctrine of the Incarnation allowed one to say that the suffering of Jesus as reported in the Gospels was experienced by the one human - and - divine person through his human nature, which avoided a run - in with the prevailing wisdom of the tim
By postulating the
existence of two
natures in this one person, the Doctrine
of the Incarnation allowed one to say that the suffering
of Jesus as reported in the Gospels was experienced
by the one human - and - divine person through his human nature, which avoided a run - in with the prevailing wisdom of the tim
by the one human - and - divine person through his human
nature, which avoided a run - in with the prevailing wisdom
of the time.
Apparently innocent, this contention meets the question
of the locus
of decision and actualization
by making
existence itself or the universe or
nature a concrescing subject.3 But this will not do, even if we have recourse to God as the inclusive being.
«This responsibility for God's earth means that human beings, endowed with intelligence, must respect the laws
of nature and the delicate equilibria existing between the creatures
of this world... The laws found in the Bible dwell on relationships, not only among individuals but also with other living beings...
by their mere
existence they bless him and give him glory»... «the Lord rejoices in all his works» (Ps 104:31).
Still others try to use the regularities
of nature as proof
of the
existence of God, and argue that the evidence
of purpose and design in the universe has been increased
by modern knowledge.
The rebirth
of the Sense
of Species, rendered virtually inevitable
by the phase
of compressive and totalizing socialization which we have now entered, affords a first indication
of the
existence of such a field
of unanimisation and a clue to its
nature.
«Since it has been entrusted to the Church to reveal the mystery
of God, Who is the ultimate goal
of man, she opens up to man at the same time the meaning
of his own
existence, that is, the innermost truth about himself... For
by His incarnation the Father's Word assumed, and sanctified through His cross and resurrection, the whole
of man, body and soul, and through that totality the whole
of nature created
by God for man's use» (41).
But the clear insight into its meaning which is given
by modern scientific philosophy shows that
by its inherent
nature and definitions it is but an abstraction and that, with all its great and ever - growing power, it can never represent the whole
of existence.9
However, this «new kind
of reality,» who is Jesus, is an emergent manifestation
of God in human life emanating from within creation: «a unique manifestation
of apossibility always inherently there for human beings
by virtue
of their potential
nature being created
by God... a new mode
of human
existence emerged through Jesus» openness to God making him a God informed human being» (ibid).
Nonetheless, many women feel so passionately about their pregnancy - which is to say, about their zygotes, even in the first few weeks
of their
existence - as to reveal
by this deep emotion the inclination that
nature has imparted in mankind to cherish and nurture the next generation.
Man becomes a metaphysician because he is seeking to realize his own
nature as a person; he is seeking to overcome the depersonalizing that
nature forces on him
by interpreting the mystery at the center
of all
existence; (See Jan T. Ramsey, ed., Prospect for Metaphysics (New York: Philosophical Library, 1961; London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd., 1961), pp. 191, 204.)
We can do only what is possible given the
nature of the world, but we are privileged to contribute to the richness
of our own
existence by our creative acts.
By emphasizing the temporality implied in the concept
of paroikia the New Testament conveyed the alien
nature of parish in its larger setting and the sojourning
of Christian groups in the world.13
By patristic times, however, the spatial aspect
of paroikia also proved useful because it designated the prolonged physical
existence of Christian community in the world.
Further, such an assumption, Whitehead urges, dispenses with the necesslty to believe that the constancy
of the velocity
of light is pertinent to spatio - temporal structure, for that structure is predetermined only
by the
existence in
nature of interrelated spacetime frames (CN 193).6
She is convinced in all her childish naïveté and innocence, this conviction also ennobles her
nature and imparts to her a preternatural greatness, so that like a thaumaturge she is able to conjure the finite powers
of existence and make the very stones weep, while on the other hand in her flurry she may just as well run to Herod as to Pilate and move the whole world
by her tears.