In general terms, the Act sets out the duty of care owed
by occupiers of premises to persons who come onto those premises and specifies certain exceptions to the prescribed duty of care.
The upshot of the decision in Schnarr is that waivers of liability will be valid if they relate to personal injury or property damage on a premises and are obtained
by the occupier of that premises.
Not exact matches
According to a release from the NIC, the compulsory insurance will cover fire and allied perils like flood, earthquake, the collapse
of buildings, storm and as well, legal liabilities
of an owner or
occupier of premises in respect
of loss
of or damage to property, bodily injury or death suffered
by all users
of the
premises and third parties.
Section 9
of the CPA undermines this purpose
by purporting to impose an additional duty upon
occupiers who offer services that the
premises are
of a «reasonably acceptable quality.»
Pursuant to s. 3 (1)
of DOLA, where damage is caused
by being bitten or attacked
by a dog on the
premises of the owner, the liability
of the owner is determined under [DOLA] and not under the
Occupiers» Liability Act.
Premises liability law involves the legal responsibility
of owners and
occupiers of property for mishaps experienced
by persons on the property and the resulting injuries.
An «
occupier» is defined in the legislation as including «(a) a person who is in physical possession
of premises; or (b) a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition
of premises or the activities there carried on, or control over persons allowed to the
premises...» An
occupier's duty
of care under the legislation is as follows: «An
occupier of premises owes a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances
of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the
premises, and the property brought on the
premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the
premises.»
9 (1) A police officer, or the
occupier of premises, or a person authorized
by the
occupier may arrest without warrant any person he or she believes on reasonable and probable grounds to be on the
premises in contravention
of section 2.
When the plaintiff visitor is a trained professional or tradesman who is retained
by the
occupier to provide skilled work, the duty
of the
occupier only encompasses the safety
of the
premises, but does not extend to telling the visitor how to practice his occupation.
By Michael Lesage In Ontario, the
occupier of property is under a statutory duty to: «take reasonable care in the circumstances to make their
premises safe.
Pursuant to the Act, an
occupier of premises owes a duty to take such care to see that persons entering on the
premises, and the property brought on the
premises by those persons, are reasonably safe while on the
premises.
The procedure is commenced
by the service
of a summary termination notice on the tenant, any qualifying interest holder, and at the
premises addressed to «the
occupier».
Premises or property liability is an area
of law that involves the legal responsibility
of owners and
occupiers of property for accidents and injuries suffered
by persons inside or outside their property due to unsafe conditions.
The appellant sued the respondents alleging negligence, breach
of duty
of care, and breach
of their duty under s. 3 (1)
of the
Occupiers» Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 2, to «take such care as in all the circumstances
of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the
premises, and the property brought on the
premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the
premises.»