If there's an excess coming into atmosphere not accounted for
by ocean outgassing, or known land / biosphere emissions, or fossil fuels, or boosted northern forest growth (and decay), or permafrost melt, then it's necessary to look for it.
Not exact matches
By breaking up petroleum into smaller droplets that dissolved faster in the deep
ocean, the dispersants decreased the amounts of volatile toxic compounds that rose to the surface and
outgassed into the air.
More important, my analysis earlier strongly suggests that the
outgassing is caused
by ocean temparature only, and not
by land temperature.
Then posters like Mr. Benson in # 7 blithly exclaim, «Just so nobody is mislead
by your maunderings, NOAA measures the uptake /
outgassing of the
oceans».
kim (1)-- Just so nobody is mislead
by your maunderings, NOAA measures the uptake /
outgassing of the
oceans.
The observed CO2 increase in the world
ocean disproves another popular #fakenews piece of the «climate skeptics»: namely that the CO2 increase in the atmosphere might have been caused
by the
outgassing of CO2 from the
ocean as a result of the warming.
I read online within the past two weeks that Russian scientists were up in the northern
oceans somewhere and they saw tons of hot spots of methane bubbling out from the
ocean surface.I think it was in ScienceDaily.The question posed
by these scientists was «is this
outgassing a normal melting of methane that has been going on for many thousands of years, or, is it an upward tick of significance?»
As the rate of net CO2
outgassing from the
ocean then is affected
by reduced solubility, this offers a simple physical explanation of the observed time lag.
Iff we were to cut CO2 emissions in half tomorrow would we still go past 580ppm
by 2100 due to possible
outgassing of the
ocean?
On longer term, this effect is countered
by the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere: more CO2 in the atmosphere means a higher pCO2, thus a smaller difference in pCO2 over the warm
oceans, thus reducing the
outgassing of CO2.
CO2 then also feeds back via
ocean absorption /
outgassing regulated
by SST's.
Assuming that about 98 % has absorbed
by the
oceans (153ppmv) and assuming that the
oceans have released about 120ppmv since 1850 due to warming, then PCO2 (aq) would have still increased, because proportionately more CO2 has been absorbed
by the
oceans than has been
outgassed.
Climate sensitivity is the doubling of temperature from a rise in CO2 that is being
outgassed by the
oceans as a result of the rising temperature (and that are in fact absorbing, not emitting CO2).
I say CO2 simply follows
ocean outgassing / absorption as it warms and cools and temperatures are bounded
by planetary albedo i.e. how much land can potentially be locked under high albedo glaciers or alternatively how much can be exposed to present a lower albedo.
CO2 was being increased
by heating of the
oceans and
outgassing of CO2 from them, not the other way around.
In other words, first temperature rises, and then CO2 rises, not the other way round; possibly caused
by CO2
outgassing from warming
oceans.
It DOES N'T take any net CO2
outgassing from the
oceans in the case that the atmospheric CO2 growth is caused to a significant degree
by warming climatic factors — there's MORE than enough human input to achieve the equilibrium between
ocean and atmosphere.
A small correction is made for differential
outgassing of O2 and N2 with the increased temperature of the
ocean as estimated
by Levitus et al. (2000).
CO2 changes
by about 10 - 15 ppm per degree C from
outgassing, as we see since the last Ice Age, and it is largely the
ocean chemistry that explains this magnitude.
I accept that most of the rise from 280 to 400 ppm is caused
by human CO2 emissions with the possibility that some of it is due to
outgassing from warming of the
oceans.
The emissions and their partitioning only include the fluxes that have changed since 1750, and not the natural CO2 fluxes (e.g., atmospheric CO2 uptake from weathering,
outgassing of CO2 from lakes and rivers, and
outgassing of CO2
by the
ocean from carbon delivered
by rivers) between the atmosphere, land and
ocean reservoirs that existed before that time and still exist today.
The total temperature increase 1959 - 2004 was 0.6 °C, thus only 1.8 ppmv is caused
by more
ocean outgassing, the rest is from anthro emissions...
Strong AGW supporters on the other hand argue that while the sun may have caused the initial temperature spike and
outgassing of CO2 from the
oceans, further temperature increases were caused
by the increases in CO2.
The time - lag between changes in temperature and consequent changes in CO2 concentration are caused
by outgassing of CO2 from the
oceans when they warm and uptake
by the
oceans as they cool.