this infographic, (an update of a 2012 version which featured only a «90 % consensus» in the left - side third box, basically identical to another 2012 variant) which portrays skeptics as crooks who've been bribed to lie
by oil industry money.
Not exact matches
Even if you have no
money to venture into the
oil and gas business, you can still profit from the
industry by offering brokerage services between buyers and sellers of petroleum products.
Break the cycle of dirty energy
money, particularly
by elected officials at all levels of government pledging to refuse campaign donations and other forms of support from the
oil, gas, and coal
industries.
I found that the amount of
money available in the fossil fuel - related
industries (coal,
oil, and natural gas production, transportation, and immediate consumption) exceeded the
money available for academic and government - funded climate research
by approximately 2,500 times.
Sixth, they say Heartland is «funded
by polluting
industries»,
by which I assume they mean a bit of
money Mobil
Oil gave Heartland some years ago... but since Mobil also gives
money to Stanford University, many times the
money that Mobil gave to Heartland, is Stanford University now suspect because it is «funded
by polluting
industries»?
His investments in fossil fuels undermines his public pledge to use his
money to eliminate the
oil, gas and coal
industries, claiming they threaten the planet
by accelerating climate change...
ExxonMobil is sabotaging the work of more than 2,000 scientists from 100 countries
by funding the most visible «greenhouse skeptics» — one of whom, S. Fred Singer, publicly denied receiving
oil industry money as recently as February, 2001.