Even if warming episodes were initiated
by orbital changes, the warming itself would cause the release of greenhouse gases from sources including the oceans and melting permafrost.
He argues that the total change in insolation caused
by orbital changes is minimal (which is true), and therefore CO2 is the main driver of climate.
The predominance of landmasses in the northern hemisphere causes glaciations to predominate over interglacials by about 9 to 1 with a full cycle every 100, 000 years helped along
by the orbital changes of the Milankovitch cycles that affect the pattern of insolation on those shifting cloud masses.
So even though past warm episodes may have been initiated
by orbital changes that caused warming and thus caused CO2 to rise, which then led to more warming, we know that the current warm episode is being driven by increasing CO2 due to the burning of fossil fuels and the clearing of forests.
-- Even during glacial and interglacial periods — mainly being caused
by orbital changes — CO2 content in atmosphere have followed temperature changes.
Similarly, times with especially intense high - latitude NH summer insolation, determined
by orbital changes, are thought to trigger rapid deglaciations, associated climate change and sea level rise.
The data show that the sun's variations have been small over the times we care about, the climate responds to variations in sunshine caused
by orbital changes, but these are slow.
These are thought to be driven by the large regional changes in insolation driven
by orbital changes.
Not exact matches
The now hyper - arid Sahara desert was characterized
by a lush extent of grass and consequently reduced dust emission due to
changes in Earth's
orbital parameters.
Holman says the
changes in the transit times of these planets were enhanced
by the fact that one of the planets orbits the star in almost exactly half of the time that it takes the other, as such «
orbital resonances» increase their gravitational interaction.
In particular, there was no sign of climate
change in Indonesia associated with Earth's
orbital precession, a wobble caused
by Earth's axis tilt that generates differences in sunlight in a 21,000 - year cycle.
The effect of these small
orbital changes was amplified
by positive feedbacks, such as
changes in greenhouse gas levels.
Scientists knew about the warming effects of greenhouse gases, but proponents of global cooling argued that greenhouse warming would be more than offset
by Earth's
orbital changes.
In the study, researchers analyzed a series of transient Coupled General Circulation Model simulations forced
by changes in greenhouse gases,
orbital forcing, meltwater discharge and the ice - sheet history throughout the past 21,000 years.
This may help explain some of the
changes that are not explained
by the
orbital curves in the other thread, especially the initiation of warming and cooling since the GCR effects can be much more powerful (partly forcing as postulated in the paper, but also amplification of the weaker
orbital forcing).
Another provocative paper, well worth reading, is
by Carl Wunsch and attempts to uage the contribution of
orbital variations to climate
change:
Led
by Lars A. Buchhave, from CfA, the study shows a connection between the
orbital period of the planet and its size as it
changes from a rocky planet to a gas giant.
While natural global warming during the ice ages was initiated
by increased solar radiation caused
by cyclic
changes to Earth's
orbital parameters, there is no evident mechanism for correcting Anthropogenic Global Warming over the next several centuries.
It is believed that the PETM was likely initiated
by changes of the
orbital parameters of the Earth (eccentricity, obliquity and precession of axis) causing an increase in the intensity and distribution of solar radiation reaching the earth (Sexton et al, 2011).
These
orbital variations, which can be calculated from astronomical laws (Berger, 1978), force climate variations
by changing the seasonal and latitudinal distribution of solar radiation (Chapter 6).
Students can begin
by viewing how the Sun impacts the Earth, and then
change the mass of the Sun and Earth separately to see how even small
changes can greatly affect
orbital patterns.
You can also
change the camera view of the table, from dynamic and
orbital (which follows the players one
by one), and when you want to check your hole cards, they lift up in a satisfying «peel» motion.
The response of that model to volcanic forcings, the last ice age,
changes in
orbital parameters etc. are all «out - of - sample» tests that are not fixed
by adjusting parameters.
As mentioned
by Chris Colose in # 6, Earth's
orbital tilt in the Eemian brought a lot of sunlight to the Arctic in the summer even our planet's overall solar input was not
changed.
The theory suggests that the system is pushed
by greenhouse gas
changes and warming — as well as solar intensity and Earth
orbital eccentricities - past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and
changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.
Raymo and Paillard have a good story about the 100KYr cycle arising from the modulation of the precessional cycle
by the
changes in the Earth's
orbital eccentricity, coupled with some glacial dynamical effects which «rectify» the high frequency precessional signal.
Although the primary driver of glacial — interglacial cycles lies in the seasonal and latitudinal distribution of incoming solar energy driven
by changes in the geometry of the Earth's orbit around the Sun («
orbital forcing»), reconstructions and simulations together show that the full magnitude of glacial — interglacial temperature and ice volume
changes can not be explained without accounting for
changes in atmospheric CO2 content and the associated climate feedbacks.
1966 Emiliani's analysis of deep - sea cores shows the timing of ice ages was set
by small
orbital shifts, suggesting that the climate system is sensitive to small
changes.
The important point here is that a small external forcing (
orbital for ice - ages, or GHG plus aerosols & land use
changes in the modern context) can be strongly amplified
by the positive feedback mechanism (the strongest and quickest is atmospheric water vapor - a strong GHG, and has already been observed to increase.
The resulting increased / decreased ice is amplified
by «various feedbacks, including ice - albedo, dust, vegetation and, of course, the carbon cycle which amplify the direct effects of the
orbital changes.»
As temperatures warmed slightly due to insolation
changes caused
by orbital cycles, ice sheets retreated slightly.
[Response: the Milankovitch timescale is long and the forcing barely varies due to
orbital changes over 100 years so no, they aren't included (they would be for people modelling the last glacial maximum); solar forcing is modelled
by change in total solar irradiance (probably as a total number; not sure if
changes at different wavelengths are included)-- William]
It's the same series of an initial forcing (
change in insolation due to Milankovitch
orbital cycles) being amplified
by reinforcing feedbacks (
change in albedo,
change in temperature and partial pressure regulating both CO2 and H2O), but in reverse from an exit from a glacial period.
Time goes
by, and the combination of
orbital factors slowly
change.
With a different overall climatic state or geography, the system might be considerably less sensitive to
orbital forcing (obviously it has been less sensitive;
orbital forcing has been going on throughout Earth's history (modulated
by tidally - induced
changes in Earth's rotation and the moon's orbit)-RRB-.
As these particular events took place at the end of a local warm period caused
by orbital forcing (see Box 6.1 and Section 6.5.1), these observations suggest that under gradual climate forcings (e.g.,
orbital) the climate system can
change abruptly.
These
orbital forcings determine the pacing of climatic
changes, while the large responses appear to be determined
by strong feedback processes that amplify the
orbital forcing.
Glacial periods during the 100,000 - year cycles have been characterised
by a very slow build - up of ice which took thousands of years, the result of ice volume responding to
orbital change far more slowly than the ocean temperatures reacted.
The National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model...
orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of climatic
change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are
by far the clearest c...
Complexity theory suggests that the system is pushed
by such things as solar intensity and Earth
orbital eccentricities — past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and
changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.
(Were the Earth a solid crystal ball, conservation of energy would prevent these
orbital changes from occurring: the Earth could not spin more slowly and the Moon could not gain potential energy
by moving away from the Earth while slowing down.)
Choice 5: Does the fact that life on this planet has survived a billion years of climate
change caused
by orbital mechanics, asteroids, the evolution of photosynthesis, plate tectonics, the variable star we call the sun, chaos, plagues, and possibly supernovae.
«
Changes in the CO2 and CH4 content have played a significant part in the glacial - interglacial climate changes by amplifying, together with the growth and decay of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets, the relatively weak orbital forcing
Changes in the CO2 and CH4 content have played a significant part in the glacial - interglacial climate
changes by amplifying, together with the growth and decay of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets, the relatively weak orbital forcing
changes by amplifying, together with the growth and decay of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets, the relatively weak
orbital forcing»
CO2 acts there as a feedback, with warmer / colder oceans holding less / more CO2, and
changing CO2 concentrations along with (lagging) temperature
changes induced
by (forced
by) insolation
changes due to
orbital mechanics.
But some time around 850,000 years ago, the cycle grew to 100,000 years, and ice sheets reached greater extents than they had in several million years — a
change too great to be explained
by orbital variation alone.
In the case of the 100 kyr ice age cycles, that forcing is high northern latitude summer insolation driven
by predictable
changes in Earth's
orbital and rotational parameters — aka, Milankovitch theory — which has the intial effect of melting glaciers, thereby reducing albedo at those latitudes.
Changes in global - mean temperature induced
by Earth's
orbital variations may be used to quantify the climate sensitivity.
The theory suggests that the system is pushed
by greenhouse gas
changes and warming — as well as solar intensity and Earth
orbital dynamics — past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and
changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.
The system is pushed
by changes in greenhouse gases, solar intensity or
orbital eccentricity.
Reviewed geological data indicate that the history of Arctic sea ice is closely linked with climate
changes driven primarily
by greenhouse and
orbital forcings and associated feedbacks.