Sentences with phrase «by other commenters»

Second, as noted by other commenters, the carbon in the woodchips mixes with the nitrogen in the urine and feces so that composting happens.

The one time I tried posting at CA I had comments snipped or removed for being «offtopic» even though I was simply offering argument against claims by other commenters, which were in the same «offtopic» subject.

Given that I have a personal issue with Stephen Schneider - who, from what I know, was an excellent science communicator - being maligned on blogs, the relevant quote that is being mentioned by other commenters is

They may contain arguments or data that conflict with those provided by other commenters.

Also, I added Italian seasoning and garlic powder (as inspired by some other commenters) and got a wonderful product — so very very tasty!

I didn't look at the fat, but a more generous interpretation of the breakdown in order to consider this a protein bar would be roughly 30 % protein, 30 % fat, and 40 % carb, up to the more extreme profile quoted by the other commenter, i.e. 20 gr protein to 5 gr carb would be predominantly protein.

Not exact matches

Other commenters, however, caution the Department against permitting any part of the Rule or PTEs to become applicable before completion of the examination required by the President's Memorandum.

Although many commenters supported a 60 - day delay for this purpose, others argued that a much longer period is needed (e.g., a 1 - year delay or an indefinite extension terminating 60 or more days after completion of the examination required by the President's Memorandum).

For example, what if the next commenter is really offended by my remarks and, buried within a set of criticisms, calls me an idiot or some other personal pejorative?

Following the attempts by some of the commenters (from both sides of the debate) to get simple «yes» and «no» answers from each other to theological questions, I have a REAL LIFE situation to pose to the readers of this blog, and I want you to state with a simple «Yes» or «No» whether you believe the following woman is saved or not.

I only used baby bellas as the other mushrooms at the store looked suspect, and used the poultry seasoning as suggested by one of the commenters (just 3 of the required spices already combined in the same bottle.)

Like a few other commenters, I found that by the end I wanted to bump up the roundness of the flavor, so I actually added a couple dashes of hot sauce and a drizzle of rice vinegar.

Despite the fact that «some school advocacy organizations, trade associations, food manufacturers, nutritionists, and other commenters suggested that NSMP [Nutrient Standard Menu Planning] be allowed as an option,» (and, by the way, is it any surprise that food manufacturers loved this approach?)

And the other factors mentioned by the previous commenter might also have something to do with the study results as well.

The only thing I did differently, as suggested by one of your other commenters, was to brush the tofu lightly with dijon mustard, before coating in nutritional yeast.

I think attacking the blogger (as a couple did, others hinted at) is a form of «vanity publishing» that says much about these commenters, and, by extension, the books they write... not good, not good...

I hope Andrea, other commenter, knows that LibraryThing is owned by AbeBooks.

I think I'm getting that education not only here from John and the cases, but from the commenters and other ways — by doing.

In particular, current Federal Housing Administration (FHA) underwriting standards set total debt at an amount not exceeding 43 percent of annual income, a standard that, as noted by a commenter, was adopted by the CFPB in recently published regulations, with housing debt comprising no more than 31 percent of that total income, leaving 12 percent for all other debt, including student loan debt, car loans, and all other consumer debt.

The other face (voiced by those same developers and commenters) is bellowing buzzwords and systems specs to a crowd of slavering graphics - porn aficionados.

I find this all generally odd - of course, there are far bigger Sony vs. media stories just breaking, but it seems like Phil is being worn down by the media and is finding snakes in the grass where, if anything, it's just particular quotes being cited and passed around by other outlets, blogs, and commenters - who are presenting legitimate soundbites in slightly hyped - up contexts.

All of this news comes from Chris Howe, PlayStation Store and PlayStation Plus Content Manager at SCEE, who was asked if they could «shift some attention» to other genres, such as strategy, with XCOM: Enemy Unknown mentioned by the commenter.

That theory can be falsified by evidence that you are studying the material to which other commenters have helpfully referred you, and gaining thereby a better understanding of the science involved — rather than ignoring that information and continuing to repeat the same ill - informed talking points.

Instead she tries to figure out for herself precisely what is happening by looking at a wide range of data and literature, and by investigating leads offered by other researchers and by commenters on xyz.com.

The other two papers cited by commenter J Doug Swallow are similarly inappropriate as support for his contentions.

The other effect that may exist here (but I am less certain of the science, commenters can help me out) is that by saying «your hometown» we put the bet into the domain of urban heat islands and temperature station siting issues.

Several commenters, particularly the New Fuels Alliance (NFA), made repeated comments that the LCFS sets up an unlevel playing field by not examining the indirect, price - induced GHG effects of other fuels.

The subsequent comments thread is a journey into the surreal - look for the out - of - left - field assertion that Maths Professor Kevin Judd is the puppetmaster pulling the strings behind this global conspiracy (affirmed by two other WUWT commenters).

By being ignored, commenters who are not deemed interesting by others will give up and go elsewherBy being ignored, commenters who are not deemed interesting by others will give up and go elsewherby others will give up and go elsewhere.

In recent discussion of the Weblog 2007 Awards, several commenters at other blogs have argued that our criticisms of the Mannian parlor tricks have been «thoroughly refuted and discarded by climatologists, published in a credible journal»; that «other professionals in the field who also have «looked in great detail at the problem at hand» and have come to the conclusion that rather than McIntyre's findings being «valid and relevant», they instead have found them to be «without statistical and climatological merit»; that CA «fluffed on the whole hockey stick thing».

Every journalist has likely experienced this effect in covering the climate change debate or other intensely polarized debates, as a particular story is harshly criticized by commenters, phone callers, or letter writers from both tail ends of the spectrum of views on the issue.

Most commenters would simply be banned outright for the kind of stuff Curtin was engaging in, but Lambert started a thread primarily so that OTHERS could amuse themselves by responding to Curtin's goofy stuff.

In response to Mr. Morano, I'll echo one of the other commenters in pointing out that AGU is a democracy, and the officers are elected by vote of the entire membership.

Doug, your claims that the Second Law of Thermodynamics means that the greenhouse gas effect is wrong has been debunked by your fellow deniers of industrial climate disruption (at Tallbloke's site among others) as well as by credible scientists (for example, many of the commenters at Skeptical Science).

After reading Zeke's explanation of the data processing (an excellent job, by the way, along with his follow ups to other other commenters), Mosh's continuing efforts to educate us on BEST's work, and a host of other data related posts and commentary that have appeared here over the years, it is patently apparent that the historical data record is simply not able to support the conclusions that are being so heroically extracted from it.

However, in this thread and on others I've read here at WUWT, Joel has been remarkably restrained in the face of IMHO unjustified personal attacks and postings by commenters who have not read his previous explanations and simply - thoughtlessly - repeat their Disbeliever mantra.

(ps, the Slashdot link refers to a Guardian article by Hafeez Ayeed, who also featured the scary AMEG stuff a while back; I'd welcome pointrs to other commenters about this NASA study)

Generally speaking, any other ideas proposed by commenters that were inconsistent with the UN viewpoints were downplayed using various UN-based arguments and then rejected.

Perhaps it is not my place to say so, but please, we've had pretty much almost 10 days civil discourse on this thread with respect shown by the commenters to each other.

On the other hand, Miller is also disconcerted by the fact that commenters can post about a service provider with limited accountability, anywhere across the Internet.

But other commenters (as well as this UVA law student) feel that laptop use harms other students who don't surf by breaking the flow of discourse in class and creating distraction.

Several commenters proposed that the rule provide for patients to receive only an accounting of disclosures made by medical records departments or some other central location, which would relieve the burden of centralizing accounting for those entities who depend on paper records and tracking systems.

The other examples provided by commenters, such as arranging, conducting, or assistance with primary and appellate level review of enrollee coverage appeals, also fall within the scope of adjudication of health benefits claims.

Other commenters maintained that section 1179 of the Act means that the Act's privacy requirements do not apply to the request for, or the use or disclosure of, information by a covered entity with respect to payment: (a) For transferring receivables; (b) for auditing; (c) in connection with --(i) a customer dispute; or (ii) an inquiry from or to a customer; (d) in a communication to a customer of the entity regarding the customer's transactions payment card, account, check, or electronic funds transfer; (e) for reporting to consumer reporting agencies; or (f) for complying with: (i) a civil or criminal subpoena; or (ii) a federal or state law regulating the entity.

Response: We agree with the commenters who suggest that denial on grounds of harm to self or others should be determined by a health professional, and retain this requirement in the final rule.

Comment: One commenter pointed out that the preamble referred to the obligations of providers and did not use the term, «covered entity,» and thus created ambiguity about the obligations of health care providers who may be employed by persons other than covered entities, e.g., pharmaceutical companies.

Comment: A number of commenters urged that the provision permitting uses and disclosures required by other law be amended by deleting the last sentence which stated: «This paragraph does not apply to uses or disclosures that are covered by paragraphs (b) through (m) of this section.»

We also are not persuaded that the risk to privacy for these activities warrants a higher degree of protection than do other payment, health care operations or treatment activities for which specific authorization was not suggested by commenters.

These changes should resolve the concerns raised by commenters regarding conflicts with state laws that require consent, authorization, or other types of written legal permission for uses and disclosures of protected health information.

We reviewed the important purposes for which some commenters said government agencies needed protected health information, and we believe that most of those needs can be met through the other categories of permitted uses and disclosures without authorization allowed under the final rule, including provisions permitting covered entities to disclose information (subject to certain limitations) to government agencies for public health, health oversight, law enforcement, and otherwise as required by law.