Sentences with phrase «by patent trolls in»

To illustrate how much troll litigation has surged, there were more cases filed by patent trolls in one month in January 2015 than in the entire year of 2004.

We look forward to working with Chairman Goodlatte, Representative DeFazio and their colleagues on the House Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan basis in order to continue to ensure that American businesses are protected against aggressive, anticompetitive attacks by patent trolls in the future.

Mr. Duan explained that design patent litigation isn't nearly as widespread as software patent litigation, but depending on what happens in Apple v. Samsung and other design patent damages cases, design patents could give rise to many lawsuits by patent trolls in the not too distant future.

Not exact matches

2014 is likely to mark a sea change for patent litigation, as both the Supreme Court and Congress actively figure out ways to rein in costly challenges brought by non-practicing entities, or trolls.

A patent troll may work a variety of ways, though each positions patent ownership as a way to generate revenue without producing any material benefits by using the patent in question.

Smaller firms in particular face a thicket of litigation by competitors and «non-practising entities» — the polite term for patent trolls.

The Internet giants warned against patent trolling, which refers to instances when companies that had no involvement in the creation or invention of a patent demand licences or other payments from legitimate companies by relying on dubious patents.

There are about 13,000 intellectual property cases a year filed in federal court (many by patent trolls and pornography companies).

«This kind of a study is important because Congress is contemplating changing the rules for fee - shifting in patent cases in order to prevent frivolous litigation by patent trolls,» he said.

Harming society In a study released on 19 September, Bessen and his co-authors estimate that patent lawsuits filed by trolls, also known as «non-practicing entities» (NPEs), caused defendants to lose more than US$ 500 billion in value from 1990 to 201In a study released on 19 September, Bessen and his co-authors estimate that patent lawsuits filed by trolls, also known as «non-practicing entities» (NPEs), caused defendants to lose more than US$ 500 billion in value from 1990 to 201in value from 1990 to 2010.

From what could find in this tired state, nintendo and M$ were sued by apparent patent trolls who only wish to sue instead of using patents to make products.

According to an article by Jeff Roberts for paidContent.org, Acacia Research Group, which some sources have called a «patent troll» (the term for a group or person who buys up patents with the intention of wielding them against others in court), assigned the patent for the sponsored activity screensaver to Network Presentation Solutions at the end of last year.

Smartbook is a notorious patent troll comany in Germany and they have just come out with pretty much a one - by - one copy of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1... with one major improvement, it's sporting an Nvidia Tegra 3 processor.

In 2010, a patent troll called IA Labs filed suit with Nintendo claiming that the Wii Fit Balance Board was in violation of at least two patents held by the companIn 2010, a patent troll called IA Labs filed suit with Nintendo claiming that the Wii Fit Balance Board was in violation of at least two patents held by the companin violation of at least two patents held by the company.

Up until February, no one knew that Rick Frenkel, an in - house lawyer at Cisco by day, was also the anonymous blogger behind the controversial Patent Troll Tracker site, where he regularly outed companies (and their lawyers) that he considered to be patent trolls — a pejorative term for one who enforces his or her patents against alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunPatent Troll Tracker site, where he regularly outed companies (and their lawyers) that he considered to be patent trolls — a pejorative term for one who enforces his or her patents against alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunpatent trolls — a pejorative term for one who enforces his or her patents against alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic.

I wrote here last week about IP lawyer Raymond P. Niro's offer of $ 5,000 to unmask the anonymous author of the blog Patent Troll Tracker, as first reported by John Bringardner in IP Law & Business.

That problem is that while the costs of litigation are real — not just money but also defensive medicine, intimidation of startups by patent trolls, intimidation of the media by billionaires — the exclusive focus on costs overlooks the crucial role of litigation in our democracy.

But Heinze also points to a post by The Patent Prospector noting that, in praising these universities for their advances in technology, Under Secretary of Commere for Intellectual Property Jon Dudas «failed to point out that these universities are what's been derisively termed «patent trolls»: like spiders in their webs, patent holders that don't practice their own inventions, instead lying in wait to ensnare unsuspecting companies who infringe their patents.&Patent Prospector noting that, in praising these universities for their advances in technology, Under Secretary of Commere for Intellectual Property Jon Dudas «failed to point out that these universities are what's been derisively termed «patent trolls»: like spiders in their webs, patent holders that don't practice their own inventions, instead lying in wait to ensnare unsuspecting companies who infringe their patents.&patent trolls»: like spiders in their webs, patent holders that don't practice their own inventions, instead lying in wait to ensnare unsuspecting companies who infringe their patents.&patent holders that don't practice their own inventions, instead lying in wait to ensnare unsuspecting companies who infringe their patents.»

A company suing on similar U.S. patents in the United States, ArrivalStar, has been called a troll by the Electronic Frontier Foundation for its patent infringement actions against municipal transit systems and organized a search for prior art against its patents.

As all of this was being followed by the anonymous Patent Troll Tracker, his identity was unmasked and he got caught up in his own set of legal entanglements.

AGs Support Federal Information - Gathering Project on «Patent Trolls» NAAG sent comments signed by 43 state and territorial attorneys general to the Federal Trade Commission in support of a proposed federal project to collect data and information about Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), also known as patent tPatent Trolls» NAAG sent comments signed by 43 state and territorial attorneys general to the Federal Trade Commission in support of a proposed federal project to collect data and information about Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), also known as patent tPatent Assertion Entities (PAEs), also known as patent tpatent trolls.

In his closing remarks, Representative Issa — who owns 37 patents from his days as an entrepreneur — discussed the Innovation Act, a bill intended to cut down on lawsuits brought by patent trolls.

Defended a Korean automobile company in a patent infringement case filed by a non-practicing entity («patent troll»).

In theory, this fee provision should deter aggressive and frivolous litigation by non-practicing entities (so - called patent trolls), by emboldening companies being sued by the trolls to stand their ground and fight back, instead of settling.

The specter of a patent troll having to pay attorney fees if it loses should result in fewer cases being brought by patent trolls.

There's a derogatory term in Silicon Valley for companies that amass huge troves of patents and make money by threatening lawsuits: «patent trolls.»

Still, patent trolls remain a major thorn in the side for tech companies, as evidenced by a $ 625 million verdict a Texas jury awarded against Apple last month.

The move is a major blow for retailers, tech companies and a wide variety of businesses that have been shaken down by «patent trolls» — shell companies whose sole business consists of forcing their targets to pay for a patent license in order to avoid expensive litigation.

In recent months, the strategy of big players in the patent troll space has become clear: head off reform by drawing a distinction between themselves and the small - time shakedown players who have been targeting mom - and - pop coffee shopIn recent months, the strategy of big players in the patent troll space has become clear: head off reform by drawing a distinction between themselves and the small - time shakedown players who have been targeting mom - and - pop coffee shopin the patent troll space has become clear: head off reform by drawing a distinction between themselves and the small - time shakedown players who have been targeting mom - and - pop coffee shops.

The trolls (who prefer to call themselves «non-practicing entities,» or NPEs) soon grew rich by exploiting an economic asymmetry in federal law that makes it relatively cheap and risk - free to file a patent lawsuit but ruinously expensive to defend one.

The solution to the problem of patent trolls is as simple as it is difficult to implement; more rigorous examination of patent applications, clarification and limitations of claims during prosecution, and increased use by the courts themselves (rather than the parties in litigation) of expert witnesses who can inform the court of the state of the art, and what implied limitations of the original invention should be considered by the court.

On the other side, trial lawyers and the patent trolls are expected to push to water it down, in part by warning that it will threaten «innovation.»

Another interesting «troll» stat, one not revealed in Apple's filings: Samsung, a company that has been sued by arch-rival Apple over patents, is the trolls» fifth most popular target.

The PatentFreedom study commissioned by Apple also shows that there are more than 250 active patent trolls in the nation.

Their exploitation of patents as a tool for extortion is undermining America's technological progress; patent trolls are collecting taxes on innovation by extracting billions of dollars in dubious licensing fees, and wasting the time and management resources of creative businesses.»

Washington, D.C. — The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) urged the Supreme Court to overturn a court decision that tilted the scales in favor of patent trolls by making it easier for them to venue shop and file lawsuits in certain courts.

Instead of investing in new jobs and services, businesses must fight frivolous claims and overly broad lawsuits made by patent trolls against a range of technologies and commonplace ideas.

«Instead of creating new jobs and investing in new technologies, businesses large and small across many industries — from national realty, construction, and technology businesses to Main Street retail shops, hotels, grocers, convenience stores, and restaurants — continue to be forced to divert scarce resources to fighting frivolous lawsuits and overly broad claims made by Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&patent trolls».»

According to a recent study by Santa Clara University School of Law professor Colleen Chien, companies making less than $ 100 million annually represented 66 percent of the defendants in patent troll litigation, and more than half of those defendants had less than $ 10 million per year in revenue.

When I started my company, I knew in the back of my mind that it wasn't a matter of if we'd get sued by a patent troll, but a matter of when.

The plea, set out in a list of priorities recited by Obama in the annual State of the Union address, comes as the House and Senate are hashing out details of the Innovation Act, a law that could fix some of the worst aspects of patent trolling.

«Instead of creating new jobs and investing in new technologies, businesses large and small across many industries... continue to be forced to divert scarce resources to fighting frivolous lawsuits and overly broad claims made by Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&patent trolls».»

My small welding shop grew to become one of the largest agricultural equipment companies in America and employ nearly 1,000 people, but we were sued by a patent troll that owned a broadly - named patent.

Approximately one in three patent suits were filed in that remote, troll - friendly district, and these suits were almost all filed by companies with no business other than suing for patent infringement.

In June, the Administration issued executive actions and legislative recommendations that would take steps to advance America's patent system by helping to mitigate the threat of patent trolls.

The patent troll problem, widely exposed by NPR in 2011, has long infuriated real companies and the tech sector.

As we've noted before, Google's non-aggression pact is no magic bullet to stop nuisance cloud - based lawsuits, in part because it provides little deterrent to so - called trolls — shell companies, often backed by lawyers and private investors, that do nothing but acquire old patents in order to file lawsuits.

In the past, President Obama and his Administration have voiced support for reforms that would address ongoing abuses of the patent system by patent assertion entities, otherwise known as patent trolls, which currently cost America's economy roughly $ 29 billion each year.

And by the way as oppose to the patent troll in question Motorola is an active manufacturer of consumer technology, so get your facts straight.

The McCurdy paper included in today's announcement also documents the drag on innovation and the economy constituted by patent trolls and their abuse of the system.»