The man they really need to consult is, once again, Cardinal Newman, who leveled devastating artillery against the argument from design, especially in The Idea of a University, which despite its well - deserved fame has long gone underutilized
by philosophers of religion, perhaps because his critique of their work is so devastating.
Not exact matches
The political
philosophers Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson reject not only Tutu's invocation
of religion and charged that,
by seeking to transform the attitudes, emotions, and moral judgments
of citizens, he improperly imports soulcraft into statecraft and transgresses the autonomy
of citizens — contemporary liberalism's most sacrosanct value.
This is particularly strange since it has so often been assumed, both
by advocates
of Eastern (South and East Asian) perspectives and
by environmentalists and
philosophers in the West, that Eastern
religions are much more resourceful for ecological sensitivity than are Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
Philosophy's recognition
of itself as
religion is neither achieved nor admitted
by all
philosophers, but among these who have recognized the identity
of philosophy and
religion are Socrates, Plotinus, Erigena, Spinoza, Hegel — in short, and in general, most
of the speculative, «Platonic» tradition, in opposition to the mainstream
of the analytic, «Aristotalian» tradition (if the reader will forgive such a gross oversimplification
of a very complex history
of thought).
By and large, music journalists aren't religious people, and, if the philosopher Max Scheler is to be believed, the non-religious are as able to describe the psychology of religion «as a person totally blind is able to describe the sensation and mood produced by vivid colors.&raqu
By and large, music journalists aren't religious people, and, if the
philosopher Max Scheler is to be believed, the non-religious are as able to describe the psychology
of religion «as a person totally blind is able to describe the sensation and mood produced
by vivid colors.&raqu
by vivid colors.»
At the end
of the introduction I was suggesting a possible direction
of research
by saying that the discourse
of the
philosopher on freedom which stays close to the kerygma, which makes itself homologous with it, is the discourse
of religion within the limits
of reason alone.
As a matter
of fact, a generation and more ago, experiments along this line were made
by several prominent American
philosophers of religion.
By and large the analytic
philosophers who have led the resurgence
of interest in the philosophy
of religion have shown little interest in either fideism or the often - skeptical themes
of Continental philosophy (they have shown somewhat more interest in process theology).
Lindbeck observed that in their emphasis upon the function
of religious language as propositional information about objective realities, conservative theologians tend to confirm the approach to
religion taken
by most Anglo - American analytic
philosophers.
Curiously, for many years the main interaction with
philosophers working in an Anglo - American mode has been through the active participation
of Dutch
philosophers of religion, led
by Vincent Brummer, in the Society for the Study
of Theology.
If, for instance, you were to condemn a
religion of human or animal sacrifices
by virtue
of your subjective sentiments, and if all the while a deity were really there demanding such sacrifices, you would be making a theoretical mistake
by tacitly assuming that the deity must be non-existent; you would be setting up a theology
of your own as much as if you were a scholastic
philosopher.
Other groups were the Scotists using the works
of the
philosopher Duns Scotus, championed
by the Franciscans; the Thomists using the texts
of Thomas Aquinas, championed
by the Dominicans — Aquinas had worked philosophy and
religion into a great single Summa, transposing Aristotle into the context
of Christian theology under the influence
of Augustine and Bernard, in which fides quaerens intellectum, faith seeking understanding, was integrated organically with philosophy; finally there was also a via antiqua, the ancient way, which was centred on Plato, but was also used to describe the Thomists.
Philosophers, theologians, and social scientists who formerly were fascinated
by the comparative approach to the study
of world
religions have begun to question the validity
of such an approach.
Shafts
of divine light,
of truths not discoverable
by «scientific» means, have broken through upon the human scene through poets,
philosophers and sages, as well as through the founders
of various
religions.