In a previous solo show titled Ideograph (2006), Rademeyer visually translated texts
by philosophers such as Gilles Deleuze and musical compositions by artists such as John Cage into visual structures, realised in the form of prints and animations.
Although this misinterpretation had been effectively criticized, not only
by philosophers such as Bergson, Meyerson, Whitehead and Reichenbach, but also by a number of physicists — among them Einstein himself, Langevin, Eddington, etc. — it was again revived recently by Costa de Beauregard, Adolf Gruenbaum, and J. J. Smart, and apparently accepted by W. Quine.
The exultation of Science is still evident in modern society and it has been fuelled by the condemnation of the validity of miracles and Christian teaching especially
by philosophers such as David Hume, who argued: «No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle...», and Richard Dawkins, the atheist evolutionist who promulgates the belief that: «The true utility function of life, that which is being maximised in the natural world, is DNA survival.»
If a process theologian is one who has been influenced
by philosophers such as Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne, then obviously you are right.
Not exact matches
The
philosopher does not start from a faith in being's intelligible disclosure of itself — in fact, he starts
by explicitly abjuring
such faith — but rather vests his trust in the power of the self to posit reality from its own unshakeable position.
(The dipolar understanding of God has been brilliantly and thoroughly expounded
by Hartshorne in
such books as Man's Vision of God, The Divine Relativity, and
Philosophers Speak of God.)
But whether I use the term «psychicalism,» favored
by the process
philosophers, or
such terms as Russell's «neutral stuff» or Feigl's distinction between the physical as the «reference» and the psychical as the «sense,» I am merely positing a name, not arguing philosophically for a conceptual scheme designed to overcome the body / mind dualism.
Some turn to the East, particularly to Taoism; some to Native American perspectives and other primal traditions; some to emerging feminist visions; still others to neglected themes or traditions within the Western heritage, ranging from materials in Pythagorean philosophy to neglected themes in Plato to Leibniz or Spinoza; and still others to twentieth - century
philosophers such as Heidegger or to philosophical movements
such as the Deep Ecology movement.9 As one would expect in an age characterized
by a split between religion and philosophy, few environmental
philosophers turn to sources in the Bible or Christian theology for help, though some — Robin Attfield, for example — argue that Christian history has been wrongly maligned
by environmental
philosophers, and that it can serve as a better resource than some might expect (WTEE 201 - 230).
Such view, needless to say, has not been upheld
by any process
philosopher.
Philosophy's recognition of itself as religion is neither achieved nor admitted
by all
philosophers, but among these who have recognized the identity of philosophy and religion are Socrates, Plotinus, Erigena, Spinoza, Hegel — in short, and in general, most of the speculative, «Platonic» tradition, in opposition to the mainstream of the analytic, «Aristotalian» tradition (if the reader will forgive
such a gross oversimplification of a very complex history of thought).
The only answer to
such a question is that of the Greek
philosopher, who, when asked about God
by an idler, kept a persistent silence.
In spite of the aspects of his thought that process
philosophers and theologians can rightly appreciate, I shall contend (1) that a fundamental weakness of Hauerwas» thought is a view of the self that is unclear and lends itself to a «substantialist» interpretation; (2) that
such a substantialist interpretation is further reinforced
by an «essentialist» understanding of Christianity; and (3) that
such an understanding culmninates in a separatist notion of the church - world relation.
One can not finish this well «written and pleasantly accessible defense of Hellenic civilization without wondering if the fierce resentment against Attic superiority (and Thornton quotes a great deal of
such resentful scholarship in the early chapters) does not conceal a closet nihilism» a hostility to the light of Being first honored and brought to expression
by the Greek
philosophers.
As his cognitional theory is explained
by Elshtain, the fifth - century theologian would be at ease with contemporary
philosophers such as Bernard Lonergan, whose theory of knowing begins with self - appropriation.
Most of these lectures aim at bringing the insights of Hinduism and Buddhism closer to Indian and Western Christians as well as
philosophers, to deepen their understanding of faith and expand it to other forms of belief.43 His anthology «The Vedic Experience» which has been accepted and respected
by many Hindus, tries to present texts from the Veda and the Upanishads in
such a way that they become open towards other beliefs and transparent for the depth of faith.44 An important aspect of his literary production, already central at the beginning, but gaining prominence again lately, has been to address a Western public that faces the challenge of having to seek its religious identity and not being able to take it for granted.
But others, like
philosophers John Searle and Thomas Nagel, say that even if
such a robot could be invented, it would be,
by definition, a «zombie» (another overworked term in the mind / body lexicon).
If, for instance, you were to condemn a religion of human or animal sacrifices
by virtue of your subjective sentiments, and if all the while a deity were really there demanding
such sacrifices, you would be making a theoretical mistake
by tacitly assuming that the deity must be non-existent; you would be setting up a theology of your own as much as if you were a scholastic
philosopher.
Despite these difficulties, some competent
philosophers still defend dualism (notably Richard Swinburne), and others propose new ways of imagining personal survival of death, Yet every
such attempt is followed
by a counterattack.
Philosophers, theologians, and social scientists who formerly were fascinated
by the comparative approach to the study of world religions have begun to question the validity of
such an approach.
As
such, it hardly warrants rousting the
philosopher Hubert Dreyfus to argue about acuity being discursively codified — and perhaps the point is even weakened
by this erudite reference.
As
such, creating artificial class of who is allowed to rule (the idea isn't new,
by the way - see Plato's
Philosopher King) is antithetical to democratic form of governance.
I was co-organiser of one
such letter signed
by 20 UK professorial scientists in 14 disciplines from 12 universities, joined
by MIT
philosopher Noam Chomsky.
Featuring never - before - seen Coltrane family home movies, footage of John Coltrane and band in the studio — discovered in a California garage during production of this film — along with hundreds of never - before - seen photographs and rare television appearances from around the world, Coltrane's story is told
by the musicians that worked with him including Sonny Rollins, McCoy Tyner, Benny Golson, Jimmy Heath, Reggie Workman, musicians that have been inspired
by his fearless artistry and creative vision like Common, John Densmore, Wynton Marsalis, Carlos Santana, Wayne Shorter, Kamasi Washington, along with Coltrane's children and biographers, in addition to well - known admirers
such as President Bill Clinton and
philosopher Dr. Cornel West.
This is an old challenge and thought
by many
philosophers such as Immanuel Kant (1979) to address this issue in his work
Titles highlighted in the Prime Reading launch offering include the Man Booker Prize shortlisted The Fishermen
by Chigozie Obioma, Harry Potter and the
Philosopher's Stone
by J K Rowling, The Angels of Lovely Lane
by Nadine Dorrie, as well as non-fiction and short - form content including Kindle Singles
by Susan Hill and Howard Jacobson and works from authors
such as Gloria Steinem.
During one
such visit in 1865, Elizabeth took Millicent to hear a speech
by John Stuart Mill, a social and political theorist and
philosopher who believed in women's suffrage.
Hidden inside this library is a cabinet of curiosities filled with items from old scientific measuring devices to books
by authors
such as the
philosopher Descartes and biologist Alfred Russel Wallace.
This rotation will include a selection of rare pieces,
such as a collage of printed cutouts of
philosopher Baruch Spinoza's biography — a figure often invoked
by Andre when discussing LeWitt's work.
The project is inspired
by the ideas of real - life
philosophers and artists
such as William Blake and Joseph Beuys.
With a title inspired
by the psychedelic track produced
by the groundbreaking musical legends Pink Floyd, (featured on the album, «The Piper at the Gates of Dawn «1967), and with content driven
by Zodiac and Chinese astrological calenders, Hippocrate's four temperaments, and artists
such as Bruce Nauman and Piero Fornasetti; this exhibition inherently commemorates and examines the great explorers,
philosophers, creators and thinkers through time, and even more specifically, through the lens of one of history's most infamous maritime disasters.
By means of accounts given by, among others, a psychoanalyst, a neurologist, a surgeon, a philosopher, a historian, a dancer and a musician, the phenomenon of phantom pain is viewed as a symptom of the denial and invisibility of such traumas as genocide, slavery and colonisation that are experienced collectivel
By means of accounts given
by, among others, a psychoanalyst, a neurologist, a surgeon, a philosopher, a historian, a dancer and a musician, the phenomenon of phantom pain is viewed as a symptom of the denial and invisibility of such traumas as genocide, slavery and colonisation that are experienced collectivel
by, among others, a psychoanalyst, a neurologist, a surgeon, a
philosopher, a historian, a dancer and a musician, the phenomenon of phantom pain is viewed as a symptom of the denial and invisibility of
such traumas as genocide, slavery and colonisation that are experienced collectively.
It includes essays
by poets, artists,
philosophers and sociologists: from civil rights figures
such as the scholar and African - American activist W.E.B. Du Bois and the Trinidadian - American Stokely Carmichael; to writers including Gertrude Stein and Joan Retallack; from artists of different generations
such as sound poet Hugo Ball (who wrote one of the founding Dada manifestos), Ad Reinhardt, Joan Jonas, William Pope.L and Felix Gonzalez - Torres; to new essays
by curators Adrienne Edwards, Laura Hoptman, Susan Thompson, Jenny Schlenzka and the critic Tom McDonough.
In the 1980s, American artists
such as Sherrie Levine and Jeff Koons brought appropriation to a new level, influenced
by the writings of German
philosopher Walter Benjamin in The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, and American critic Rosalind Krauss in her 1985 book The Originality of the Avant - Garde and Other Modernist Myths.
I'll believe we have a chance when
such a plan is proposed not
by poets and
philosophers, but
by engineers and politicians.
There, well - known
philosopher Dr. Henry Shue (currently at Oxford) gave an excellent and compelling talk about the (strong) moral / ethical case for taking action to address and minimize risks
such as those presented
by climate change.
A belated comment: my training is also as a
philosopher, and I was consciously hired and employed as
such by Sun Microsystems (now Oracle).