It's like saying «Prove there is not a planet 100,000,000 light years away that is populated
by pink unicorns, and they are in a constant life and death battle with orange dinosaurs.»
Not exact matches
If you will turn the table of the burden of prrof you have to agree wtih me that the universe was created
by the great
pink unicorn with golden ears, because you can not disprove that such a creature with unlimited power exists.
«If you will turn the table of the burden of proof you have to agree with me that the universe was created
by the great
pink unicorn with golden ears, because you can not disprove that such a creature with unlimited power exists.»
So
by * this * reason then the
pink unicorn is as reasonable as god?
I know, with all my heart, that a flying,
pink and purple leapord print
unicorn who flies on rainbows created
by the love and adoration of his millions of followers, exists.
You'll never know what it is like to be called
by the supreme invisible
pink unicorn, master of all universes and gods.
You can give your god any attributes «
by definition», I can do the same with an invisible
pink unicorn.
It only separates what has been falsified from what has not, within the standard applied
by science (invisible
pink unicorns have not been falsified, but they're not in the purview of science).