«Respondents consistently indicate that approximately 40 % of their investment decision is determined
by policy factors,» according to the report.
Not exact matches
Important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment
by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders
by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending
by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Maternal mortality review committees can play a key role in this process, public health experts say,
by identifying pregnancy - related deaths that might otherwise be overlooked, analyzing the
factors contributing to those deaths, and translating the lessons into
policy changes.
Such risks, uncertainties and other
factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred
by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and
factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various
factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered
by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
This is driven
by a basket of
factors including U.S. tax reforms and Buy America
policies, he added.
In late August, Mordy wrote an article entitled «China's Crash: Postponed» asserting that while China is, indeed, moving toward a market economy, it is still controlled largely
by the government, and therefore
policy remains the most important risk
factor.
Important
factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and services; the acceptance of our products and services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and services; the acceptance of our products and services
by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or
policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued
by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk
Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10 - Q.
Price structures are often influenced
by two
factors: cost - plus (maintaining prices at a level that exceeds product costs
by a certain margin) or opting to follow the market leader's price structure and being completely driven
by its
policy.
The Canadian Global Cities Council, a coalition of Canada's eight largest urban regional chambers of commerce, is calling for airport
policy reform to align Canada with global best practices, and for our international airports to be
factored into transit infrastructure planning
by all levels of government.
There is also a convenience
factor by being able to pay for both
policies to the same company.
Over 2018, we expect the direction of European fixed income markets to be determined principally
by European Central Bank (ECB) monetary
policy and the political backdrop, in much the same way as these two
factors have dominated 2017.
However, a large literature concludes that the equilibrium real short - term rate is very unlikely to be constant, with its value affected
by many
factors, including the pace of technological change, fiscal
policy and the evolution of financial conditions.3
Commodity prices may be affected
by a variety of
factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii) governmental programs and
policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity.
A recent report
by the Conference Board of Canada estimates that, based on the pace of the Canadian economy (and ignoring
factors that are constraining our maneuvering space on monetary
policy, such as the situation in Europe and the Fed's interest rate target), our key interest rate right now should be 2.5 per cent.
However, when the changes are driven
by persistent demand
factors,
policy - makers will need to give consideration to whether monetary
policy needs to be adjusted.
The concern that the network hashrate will become too low is based on several assumptions and variables, including the number of daily transactions, the willingness of the users to wait for confirmations, the willingness of the users to pay small amounts, the behavior of the miners, the fee
policies set
by various wallets, the emergent consensus on acceptable fees
by the mining community, and other
factors, including what actually is «too low» of a network hashrate in the first place.
Without such reasons or explanation, Canadians can only guess as to «the wider public
policy factors» (Pembina at para. 74) taken into account
by the GiC in ultimately granting project approval.
The Great Depression was a period of great turmoil, caused
by many
factors and not just beggar - thy - neighbour
policies.
On the Federal Reserve communication front, the first post-FOMC speech
by Dallas Fed President Kaplan (non-voter) echoed Atlanta Fed President Lockhart's earlier views that Brexit will
factor into U.S. monetary
policy considerations.
But a combination of
factors — including a more dovish - than - expected update from the ECB, perceptions that Fed Chair Yellen's dovish tilt to Fed
policy would likely be maintained
by Jerome Powell and the absence of any sign of pricing pressures — saw them dip once more back into the trading range that has held for much of 2017.
Before late January injected a surge of volatility into equities, driven
by investor fears over a handful of
factors including rising rates, tightening monetary
policy, more regulation on big tech and rising global trade tensions, investors were smooth sailing on the nine - year bull market.
Since March 2009, the S&P 500 Index has had a total return of approximately 250 %, driven
by two primary
factors: First, super-easy global monetary
policy in the wake of the banking crisis, which drove down returns on safe assets to the point where risky assets became a much more compelling proposition than is typical.
The market strategist sees «no levers left to pull» for a market that has been supported
by factors such as a decade of ultra-easy money
policy and, most recently, a big juicy corporate tax cut.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to report on how their investment
policies and performance are affected
by environmental
factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate
policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related issues.37
Real estate is local though prices are also impacted
by national and global
factors — such as monetary
policies and offshore investors who consider US housing as an asset class and escape route — as well as
by local
factors.
That trend, rather than the published (or «headline») rate which can be affected
by «special»
factors, is what matters for monetary
policy purposes.
If those guys are largely right about the incentive
factors that would then come into play (and especially if Americans were moderating their economic libertarianism with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then
by no means would that cause the social welfare
policy disaster most liberals assume it would.
When there is economic pressure on a people due to the
policies imposed
by the globalization process, there could be an accentuation of the differences among them based on cultural or religious
factors.
It said international trade is affected
by numerous
factors such as price, exchange rate, competition, market - specific issues, domestic
policies and commercial
factors.
Food choices influence body weight and are shaped
by environmental
factors, including physical, social and
policy, collectively termed the food environment (2).
While some of these
factors, such as food safety concerns and technological innovations, are unpredictable in magnitude and timing, others are observable (e.g. income growth), constrained
by supply side
factors (e.g. lack of feed) and determined
by institutional changes (e.g. harmonization of standards) and
policies (e.g. agricultural subsidies and environmental regulations).
However, when it comes to child protection, routine engagement with fathers and father - figures has seemed a distant ideal: safeguarding
policy has repeatedly failed to identify this as an issue despite the fact that Serious Case Reviews over a twenty year period (most recently the Ofsted Serious Case Review summary of 46 cases, as well as both of the Baby Peter Serious Case Reviews) have found failure
by practitioners to engage with the men in children's lives to be a major
factor in child abuse and deaths.
The 1998 and 2005 AAP
policy statements and the Back to Sleep campaign not only addressed the importance of back sleeping but also provided recommendations for other infant care practices that may reduce the risk of SIDS and other sleep - related infant deaths.1, 9 Unfortunately, the ability to measure the prevalence of these other risk
factors is limited
by lack of data.
Several
factors contribute to the undermining of breastfeeding: lack of understanding and education, including that of some doctors and hospitals; employment
policies that don't support and encourage breastfeeding mothers; lack of general social support and education; and aggressive marketing campaigns waged
by the multibillion dollar formula industry.
Previous attempts to evaluate the Baby Friendly Initiative within an observational study design have often been limited
by small sample size or reliance upon ecological measures of confounding
factors.16, 17 The advantage of the Millennium Cohort Study is the availability of individual - level social and demographic information, as well as the circumstances of pregnancy and delivery, allowing adjustment for
factors that in other studies may be associated with both
policy intervention and infant feeding practices, via area or individual population differences.
Effective food
policy actions are part of a comprehensive approach to improving nutrition environments, defined as those
factors that influence food access.1 Improvements in the nutritional quality of all foods and beverages served and sold in schools have been recommended to protect the nutritional health of children, especially children who live in low - resource communities.2 As legislated
by the US Congress, the 2010 Healthy Hunger - Free Kids Act (HHFKA) updated the meal patterns and nutrition standards for the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program to align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.3 The revised standards, which took effect at the beginning of the 2012 - 2013 school year, increased the availability of whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and specified weekly requirements for beans / peas as well as dark green, red / orange, starchy, and other vegetables.
Strengthening Families Center for the Study of Social
Policy Describes an initiative to prevent child abuse and neglect
by helping child welfare and early education professionals enhance protective
factors in children, youth, and families.
The key
factors for bringing about that discussion are that Palestinians realise that statehood is only attainable
by negotiation, borders must be agreed upon, changes on the ground must support
policies rather than work against them, and the wider region must play a role.
Rayhan Haque
Policy adviser, CESI (writing in personal capacity) Labour must find its media charm again As pointed out
by «Labour's empty space» (TP, June), the Labour Party must not just tackle one
factor contributing to their 2010 failure, but focus on an overhaul.
He held that the company's performance this year was impacted
by two major
factors of tough economic challenges around consumer spending, which according to him driving consumer preferences towards value brands across the sector as well as the effects of FX
policy and Naira devaluation.
The Pataki Commission can only justify this giveaway
by totally ignoring research
by the State's tax
policy experts who, in the Department of Taxation and Finance's recent report on the estate tax, concluded that «Migration studies regarding the impact of taxes such as the estate tax have shown that taxes generally are not a major
factor in the decision of where to live or retire.»
Whilst our initial mission to rid Afghanistan of al - Qaeda was laudable and understandable, our
policy since has been undermined
by two
factors — lack of clarity as to the continuing mission, and subsequent confusion as to our real enemy.
Thirty - nine percent of voters said Trump was a
factor in the Virginia race, according to a poll released late last month
by the Wason Center for Public
Policy at Christopher Newport University.
The questions is a bit of a simplification — firstly saying that one sagely considers the parties»
policies is obviously a more «socially acceptable» answer than saying one votes for the nicest chap, and equally most pollsters (not least MORI themselves) will tell you that there is a third important
factor, the overall image of a party, which is itself influenced
by the leader's image and the party
policies.
The rates do not
factor in tax exemptions or deductions, as pointed out
by E.J. McMahon from the Empire Center for Public
Policy.
Professor Sarah Birch's research for the Institute for Public
Policy Research shows the toxic effect of these two
factors together: only a third of under - 35s earning # 10,000 or less voted, so their voice was swamped
by the 80 % of over-55s earning # 40,000 or more who did.
► This week's issue of Science also includes a brief recap of the 40th annual AAAS Forum on Science and Technology
Policy, attended
by «more than 400 elected officials, government and business leaders, researchers, educators, and others» on 30 April and 1 May in Washington, D.C. «The importance of basic research for the nation's scientific and economic future was a recurring theme,» and «participants delved into the
factors driving the tight budget environment» scientists are currently facing.
As New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg prepares to leave office, a commentary
by a leading bioethicist analyzes his controversial public health
policies and concludes that he is an urban innovator who created a new paradigm of public health, «reaching beyond infectious diseases to upstream risk
factors in everyday life and the human habitat.»
«It will be valuable to learn whether improvements in earnings
by families with pregnant women, improved maternal nutrition or reduced maternal stress — all
factors associated with higher birth weight — also translate to better cognitive outcomes in childhood,» said Figlio, IPR faculty fellow and Orrington Lunt Professor of Education and Social
Policy and of Economics at Northwestern's School of Education and Social
Policy.
Halfon, who is also a professor of pediatrics, public health and public
policy, said the study is the first to examine how socioeconomic status is associated with a wide variety of
factors that impact a young child's math and reading abilities
by kindergarten.