Sentences with phrase «by poor use»

In truth, having more debt than you can handle may have started out by over-spending or by poor use of credit card debt however we often find that in most cases the tip over the edge occurs when combined with one of the above causes.

Not exact matches

Run by a non-profit organization, Project Isizwe specifically targets very poor areas and offers people 250 megabytes of data each day, to use as they see fit.

the preservation among the Jews of «the «haggling» habit which most of the Western world has outgrown,» «the use of shoddy or poor materials,» the fact that «Jews are considered by certain leading insurance companies as a poor fire risk,» etc..

MSCI Sector Indexes comprise global, regional and country sector, industry group and industry indexes constructed using the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS ®), a widely accepted industry classification framework for investment research, portfolio management and asset allocation jointly developed and maintained by MSCI and Standard & Poor's.

But the medical deduction is actually a bit different: It is used more by poorer tax filers than those who are especially rich.

For instance, one approach is to use gender diversity as a screen by minimizing exposure to companies with poor gender diversity records including weak policies, poor supply chain safety records or involvement in the adult entertainment industry.

Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

S&P Dow Jones: Standard & Poor's ®» and S&P «S&P ®» are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC («S&P») and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC («Dow Jones») and have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes by MFS.

Standard & Poor's ® and S&P ® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC («S&P»); Dow Jones ® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC («Dow Jones»); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by SPDJI and sublicenses for certain purposes by Forethought Life Insurance Company.

Good set - ups often take time to develop, and therefore by using 60 second binary options you may be distracted by mediocre or poor trade set - ups, missing the good ones.

«CUSIP» identifiers have been provided by CUSIP Global Services, managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC, and are not for use or dissemination in a manner that would serve as a substitute for any CUSIP service.

Filing a trademark violation case for using the world «Fortune» which they knew was owned by Time Magazine, and not them, was just a way to take advantage of the system by someone with more money that the poor defendant had.

Marriage vows, even secular ones, used to invoke the promise to remain united «for richer or poorer, in sicknes and health» until parted by death.

The quickest and easiest way to understand the second condition is to use its theological analog, the preferential option for the poor: the more disadvantaged and marginalized people are, the greater should be the assistance and solicitude extended to them by those in a position to help.

It is appropriate for Speaker Boehner and others with political influence to use that influence by speaking in favor of aiding the poor.

Many pastors and churches use Malachi 3:8 («Will a man rob God») to guilt people into giving to the church while the church is robbing the poor of that which is rightfully theirs by misappropriating these funds into salaries, buildings, etc..

First, part of the problem in Romans 5:13 is the poor decision by some Bible translators to use the word «imputed.»

«The clergy could be called to account by the state if they failed to make use of their privileges for the benefit of the poor.»

Poorer people used to work on those farms, but they've largely been replaced by the Transformer - size machines you see driving along the road during harvest.»

The radical response to these facts is to restrict our own consumption of goods and services, our own material standard of living, either in order to share more of our wealth with those in need, or in order to serve God better by using our time to work for justice and peace or by sharing the lot of the poor.

She was denounced for meeting with unsavory politicians and businessmen, in order to assist the poor, but ironically, it is Hitchens who used the film to promote Jean - Bertrand Aristide, a notorious ex-priest whose record as Haiti's President was symbolized by corruption and abuse.

Some of the insights provided by the first phase of liberation theology seem too important to let slip between the cracks — for instance, the centrality of the category «the poor» for biblical interpretation; the awareness of structural, not just individual, evil; the use of the social sciences as dialogue partner for theological discourse; and the need to apply a hermeneutic of suspicion to theology itself.

LMAO Poor Bob is trying to disqualify 480,000 experts by using his own prejudice and bigoted opinion, well Duh Bob it's not just these experts the courts are also ruling in their favor..

But through their stories, we see that even though they were used by God in tremendous ways, their vast wealth contributed to their making some really poor choices.

Weren't they sent by God and stuff but extremely poor equiped for their missions and used only already available methods to spread their message aka word of mouth and tablets or papyrus?

John Kirkby started CAP in Bradford in 1996, believing that God was calling him to sacrifice his career in the financial industry and use his experience to help the poor - people crippled by debt, living in fear and without hope.

The verse 2 Thessalonians 3:10 «For even when we were with you, this we commanded you: that if any would not work, neither should he eat» is mostly used by conservatives as the explanation of their anti-Christian behavior, however this was common practice among communists, and the real sense was that the bourgeoisie should not exploit the poor.

The sheer economics of the situation suggests that drastic improvement in the lives of the world's poor can be made by using resources that amount to little more than the crumbs on our tables.

If, for instance, you try to use capitalism to promote greater equality of wealth by imposing on it a steeply progressive, redistributive system of taxation, you frustrate the way in which it rewards its chief dynamic force, the acquisitive impulse, and you are liable to end by making everyone poorer.

Barley was fed to animals by the prosperous, but the poor used it to make their bread.

God was used to control the poor and ever since then it is used by people in power to influence those not in power and it is still in use today, just look at the U.S congress, we even have separation of church and state, but that doesn't seem to stop people.

We will look at these features of the poor both from the standpoint of how they may constitute liabilities for the poor and, at the same time, implicit strengths which can be used in their behalf by the sensitive minister trying to be of help.

What I'm saying, in the example of Mother Theresa, is that it is blatantly obvious by the accounts of many who have seen these «hospitals» that the money she was given was not used to «ease the pain» of the dying poor.

The Bible (especially the lyrical King James version) is full of useful phrases and metaphors — indeed, that may be its most valuable contribution to civilization — and the English language would be poorer by far if we were required to use them only with the meaning and in the context in which they were originally written.

Just wait until she comes back and gives her report about how greatly she was used by God to take the Gospel to the poor, lost souls overseas...

«Lets keep taxes low for everyone (except the rich... we'll keep their taxes even lower) and the we'll cut funding for programs used by the poor.

At least seven immense, interdependent threats to the quality of life on spaceship earth continue to escalate: the population explosion; the widening gulf between rich and poor nations; massive malnutrition (caused mainly by economic injustice, which produces maldistribution of available food); environmental pollution and degradation; the depletion of the irreplaceable resources of our finite planet; the growing threat of nuclear terrorism and eventual holocaust (with the equivalent of one and a half million Hiroshima - sized bombs in the arsenals of the world); and the worldwide tendency for the fruits of science and technology to be used without ethical responsibility.

«In the USA consumer groups argue that the divestiture of AT&T has disenfranchised groups of consumers from use of the telephone by the rebalancing of charges and the liberalization of the local network monopoly - these groups are the elderly, the poor and those living in high - cost rural areas».

Meanwhile, the poor are used by the press as a club to beat Republicans.

Collected for the most part by industrialized countries, where the principal financial markets are located, this money could be used to help struggle against inequalities, to promote education and public health in poor countries, and for food security and sustainable development.

Even as the poor are used as pawns by fundamentalist groups, benefits go to the powerful in each group.

We are not using God's Word, the Bible, when trying to educate people, Christians and non-Christians, about what God has to say about caring for the poor, racism (a taboo subject in many evangelical circles), and articulating moral principles like the immoral budget proposed by Ryan - Romney as well as many other societal issues.

When was the last time Bauchmann proposed how to turn our nation from the wrath of God by using the trillions we throw down the war machine toilet to instead help our homeless, sick and poor?

You are touting the foolish liberal idea that is used to keep the poor down on the plantation by keeping them victims who earn next to nothing.

Its teachings are very, very simple: There really are free and natural markets where the optimum value of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth of all of us; governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working out of these splendid principles.

Poor sad soul used and by greedy republican leaders is just too ignorant to understand.

(Though we need to note that while the Bible speaks consistently for justice and for siding with the poor it offers little that is unambiguous about policy and strategy for achieving it - another example of how God gives plenty of scope to us to participate in creation - redemption by using our imagination and initiative!)

The Vietnam war was not only a gross miscalculation, politically and militarily, but a moral wrong inflicted by a massive use of cruel weapons forbidden by international law, mostly against poor and innocent civilians.

Would He destroy a system used by the wealthy of socialized medicine world even though those same people force the poorest of their own countries to use their socialized system?

You really don't seem to have a good grasp on logic, and you seem to often fall back on IMPLICATIONS of the ad populum fallacy or others and use very poor argumentation that has been refuted by sound logic many, many times..