abrupt climate change occurring «over periods as short as decades or years,» which could be brought on
by positive feedbacks triggered by such events as ice sheet collapse on a large scale, the collapse of part of the Gulf Stream, dieback of the Amazon forest, or coral reef die - off.
Not exact matches
Elowitz and Gurol Suel, then a postdoctoral researcher in Elowitz's lab, discovered that the decision to become competent is governed
by random gene activity, which in turn
triggers a
positive feedback loop.
These are over and above those
positive feedback mechanims
triggered by evolving climate mechanisms.
If that CO2 release was in fact (partly)
triggered by warming — a
positive climate
feedback — we need to know from what store it came and exactly how stable that spot looks today.
The steepness of these reductions curves is somewhat controversial because any calculation of a carbon budget which determines the steepness of the the needed reduction curve must make assumptions about when
positive feedbacks in the climate system will be
triggered by rising temperatures, yet these controversies are reflected in giving different probabilities about the likelihood of achieving a specific warming limit.
But I can't imagine them being
triggered by culminating
positive feedbacks from cyclic oscillations in the ocean / atmosphere.
It all starts with a small
trigger (whatever the cause), that is fortified
by responses which are strong
positive feedbacks, but limited (self limiting, like ice sheets in the case of ice ages) in total effect.
This
triggers a
positive feedback by lowering the albedo of the ocean's surface and leading to more of the Sun's light being absorbed, amplifying the warming.
My understanding is that the atmosphere warmed
by about 6 degrees C from our current level, and that
triggered increasing releases of methane from clathrates in a
positive feedback fashion over thousands of years (or was it millions of years??).