No doubt, the debate rages on, but I argue further that since digital communication simply means an electronic transmission of information that has been encoded digitally, it is only appropriate to argue that a digital signature is one form of electronic signature produced
by public key cryptography.
Since «digital signature» is widely used to mean, as the last commenter says, electronic signatures produced
by public key cryptography, the expression should ideally not be used as a generic synonym for any electronic signature.
Not exact matches
Most sensitive web transactions are protected
by public -
key cryptography, a type of encryption that lets computers share information securely without first agreeing on a secret encryption
key.
Secure internet transactions mostly use
public key cryptography, which is pretty good but can in principle be hacked
by a sneaky eavesdropper or someone with a powerful enough computer.
Eighty characters isn't enough to record, say, all the
public keys certified
by a
public -
key cryptography system.
The
key innovation is a
public blockchain that eliminates the need for a central counterparty to act as a third party to financial transactions, relying instead on a decentralised peer - to - peer network secured
by advanced
cryptography.
Digital security certificates create an encrypted connection using
public key cryptography, typically indicated
by «https» and a padlock appearing in the URL window of a browser.
In
cryptography, a
public key is a cryptographic
key that can be utilized
by any party to encrypt a message.