Sentences with phrase «by rational people»

At least IRS does some things which could thought by rational people as of some use.

The two leading theories are the Debt Snowball, as advocated by Dave Ramsey, in which you pay the smallest debts first, and the Right Way, as advocated by rational people, in which you pay the highest interest rate debts first.

It's only recent that their bigotry is no longer accepted by rational people (and for the sake of this argument that includes moderate christians).

It's easy to understand why the Roman torture device that is the symbol of a soon - to - be-marginalized religion is inappropriate in any monument set up by rational people.

Typical of these right - wingers; they make these outlandish, incendiary statements, designed to rev up their base, then quietly apologize when they are called out by rational people.

Good thing she has no power, and will not be given it by any rational person.

Your worship an event that was torture, disgusting, and should be despised by any rational person.

normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.

It also doesn't sound like those words were put together by any rational person with any knowledge of the world around them.

ps fans have been in the mud long after ps3 realease right along with 360 fans, the 1 year to 7 is laughable I could easily show soooooo much trolling from ps fans all last gen just as easily as you could show some from Xbox fans so just stop the BS, especially when this very site by any rational person would be admittedly skewed positively towards ps, which is fine because maybe that's just how popular the brand is but it also bleeds over to there being way more fanatical, irrational fanboys of the ps type on this site.

You are owed thanks by every rational person concerned by the misinformation that circulates.

BBD It would certainly mean that the skeptics were correct to question the high estimate that was the consensus of all the world's climate scientists (and thus, could not be questioned by any rational person).

Not exact matches

Erin Lowry, author of Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping By and Get Your Financial Life Together, says, «People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.»

Every major sell - off in history has been accompanied by a mix of economic concerns, monetary policy shifts, geopolitical tensions, or some other source of consternation that might make a rational person demand a higher premium for putting their capital at risk.

At this point, the vast majority of people my age — being honest, the dividing line seems to be around 45 years old — roll their eyes and, in a perfectly rational manner, argue that a currency is usually boring and backed up by meaningful institutions such as central banks.

By replying to me and typing a counter arguement, a rational and thinking person will see those impliocations as things you have said.

His non-existence is being acknowledged by people with rational minds.

«do it by force»???? Atheists tend to be pretty rational, reasonable people who are also non-violent.

@response you said: «You might actually try real, honest dialogue about faith and belief instead of just railing off extremes and trying to cover it by saying all atheists are rational, reasonable people.

Name - calling is also a sign someone is frustrated by people who refuse to be honest or rational.

However, the assumption of the psychotherapist is that irrational behavior can be brought under rational control by re-educating the person in healthy interpersonal relationships.

If persons were only intelligent organisms with finite wants, the problem of adjusting demand and supply could in principle be easily settled by rational calculation.

Chad the Sumerian said, «Any reasonably intelligent person could only conclude He was in fact real by suspending rational inquiry in that matter.»

Of course I think a more rational approach is to simply view all those verses as written by mere people.

As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....

He is thus against natural law theory but for a DCT in which God, by creating rational creatures, is bound to make their highest end a relationship with the divine persons, but free to pursue that end via any number of routes.

More prevalent and more insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere people by the very nature of its claim to base moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible rational principles.

In contrast to people in biblical times «modern man acknowledges as reality only such phenomena or events as are comprehensible within the framework of the rational order of the universe... the thinking of modem men is really shaped by the scientific world - view, and.

Christian theology must make its case, I have argued, by presenting a worldview that is intrinsically convincing to people because of its rational coherence and its adequacy to the facts of experience.

This does not mean that a person can not have a rational understanding of Christianity or of what the Bible teaches apart from the illumination of his or her mind by the Spirit.

Yet more evidence that religions (not faith mind you) is populated by ignorant people who would rather use their fears and insecurities to rule their decisions than rational thought.

If you want to convince people of the truth of Christianity, the best way to «argue» it today is not through reason and and rational propositions, but by becoming more and more like Jesus in everything we do.

Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation of society and state by liberating them from the control of established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society by adherents of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of human society enabling ordering of secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.

Endowment with reason and conscience, and hence that a human person is a rational and moral being, is commonly accepted by all peoples, whatever their philosophy, ideology or religion.

The human person is, first and foremost, rational in nature, and fulfillment lies in fuller knowledge (plus, of course, the love that is merited by every truth one appropriates).

What most rational people want is equality that is not defined by YOUR religious beliefs!

Being a rational skeptic, I have to assume that you were, at some point in your life, influenced by someone, a Christian most likely, either on TV, radio, in a book, or in person.

In addition to these crazy and immoral laws, there are plenty of examples of God's irrationality by his direct killing of many people for reasons that defy any rational explanation such as killing children who make fun of bald people, and the killing of a man who tried to keep the ark of God from falling during transport.

From these considerations it becomes clear that mathematics, which superficially appears to have no relevance to the knowledge of human nature, actually affords important insights about human beings, not only as rational agents, but as persons with freedom yet also bound by necessities in the spatiotemporal order.

I, like probably many other rational and reasonable people, am baffled by your behavior and actions.

I was just blindsided by this but you are right I forgot for a moment that most is said to get us rational thinking people going.

According to Murdoch, the thoughtful modern person can no longer conceive of men and women as rational creatures who are slowly expunging evil from their midst; instead, it is necessary to think of human beings as «benighted creatures sunk in a reality whose nature we are constantly and overwhelmingly tempted to deform by fantasy.»

At other times crisis intervention is carried on by helping the person to gain cognative control of his own thought processes — by helping him to structure, to outline, to list in an organized and rational way the different elements of his life.

A God who at first glance is comparable to the picture of the Oriental ruler, who governs his people with complete arbitrariness, bound by no rational law; but a God who is conceived as wholly different from an Oriental ruler, since all physical traits are lacking, all tyrannical desires alien; a God who desires justice and righteousness and punishes sin, a God who loves His people as a father his first - born son, a God to whom the religious man ills as to his father, and in whose help he trusts in all situations of life.

If we can avoid the dangers of environmental devastation or global warfare brought about by the megalomaniacal pursuit of technological power, and the almost equally dreary prospect of a world of persons controlled by behavioral engineers in the name of technological rationality, we may move into a future in which the pursuit of power and rational order gives way to the cultivation of «intensities of experience.»

What you see as hate from atheists is the expression rational thought by people who don't believe in religious voodoo.

I was just thinking about her today, by chance, and her amazing reversion, because my mother read her Jesus books... And I was thinking, damn, it's such crap the way she talked about how she stopped being an atheist because of the historicity of Jesus, no rational person can make that argument, she walking on glass, then BOOM!

Different kinds of pleasures are preferred by different persons — they may even be incommensurable for a single person, or at least not comparable in terms of specific rational principles.

The human individual, as a concrete instantiation of a rational and free nature, is «distinct by reason of dignity», and because of this we attribute to him the word person.

If someone states that they have been abducted by ET, or claims to have seen BigFoot, or state that they can view future events etc. then rational minded people will challenge them to provide evidence.